Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:00:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909154739.1515514-27-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional sysfs `mmap` support allows userspace to bypass hardware synchronization and power management.
--

commit 7fda3c54de1f0a266f9aa7c8acdc3ab9ae36340e
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Subject: platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks

A callback indicates that the parent driver is responsible for accessing
the data area, making a PMT memory remap redundant. This commit skips
creating a remap if a read_telem callback has been provided.

> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index 402d51df834a6..1c7a372b4fc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,14 +403,19 @@ static int intel_pmt_dev_register(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
>  	if (!entry->size)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	res.start = entry->base_addr;
> -	res.end = res.start + entry->size - 1;
> -	res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +	/*
> +	 * The read_telem callback is responsible for this mapping, and may have
> +	 * different requirements for use. If the callback is present do not
> +	 * create the map.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(entry->cb && entry->cb->read_telem)) {
> +		struct resource res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(entry->base_addr, entry->size);
>  
> -	entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> -		goto fail_ioremap;
> +		entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> +		if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> +			goto fail_ioremap;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	sysfs_bin_attr_init(&entry->pmt_bin_attr);
>  	entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.name = ns->name;
>  	entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.mode = 0440;
>  	entry->pmt_bin_attr.mmap = intel_pmt_mmap;

[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally assigning intel_pmt_mmap in intel_pmt_dev_register() allow
userspace to bypass the read_telem callback requirements?

Since intel_pmt_mmap() in drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c directly maps
the physical BAR memory into userspace:

drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c:intel_pmt_mmap() {
    ...
    if (io_remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn, vsize, vma->vm_page_prot))
    ...
}

any process with read permissions can mmap the sysfs attribute. If the process
then reads this mapping, won't it entirely bypass the parent driver's power
management (like xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active) and hardware synchronization?

If the device is in a low-power state, an unpowered MMIO read might cause a
system-level PCIe bus hang, or read corrupt state if the SoC re-mapper is not
configured.

Should mmap support on the sysfs attribute be disabled when a read_telem
callback is present?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909154739.1515514-22-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 15:47 [PATCH v7 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:00   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support EAGAIN return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:01     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:03     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-10 18:55   ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev9) Patchwork
2026-09-09 15:57 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox