From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:00:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909154739.1515514-27-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional sysfs `mmap` support allows userspace to bypass hardware synchronization and power management.
--
commit 7fda3c54de1f0a266f9aa7c8acdc3ab9ae36340e
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Subject: platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
A callback indicates that the parent driver is responsible for accessing
the data area, making a PMT memory remap redundant. This commit skips
creating a remap if a read_telem callback has been provided.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index 402d51df834a6..1c7a372b4fc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,14 +403,19 @@ static int intel_pmt_dev_register(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> if (!entry->size)
> return 0;
>
> - res.start = entry->base_addr;
> - res.end = res.start + entry->size - 1;
> - res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + /*
> + * The read_telem callback is responsible for this mapping, and may have
> + * different requirements for use. If the callback is present do not
> + * create the map.
> + */
> + if (!(entry->cb && entry->cb->read_telem)) {
> + struct resource res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(entry->base_addr, entry->size);
>
> - entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> - goto fail_ioremap;
> + entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> + goto fail_ioremap;
> + }
> }
>
> sysfs_bin_attr_init(&entry->pmt_bin_attr);
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.name = ns->name;
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.mode = 0440;
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.mmap = intel_pmt_mmap;
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally assigning intel_pmt_mmap in intel_pmt_dev_register() allow
userspace to bypass the read_telem callback requirements?
Since intel_pmt_mmap() in drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c directly maps
the physical BAR memory into userspace:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c:intel_pmt_mmap() {
...
if (io_remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn, vsize, vma->vm_page_prot))
...
}
any process with read permissions can mmap the sysfs attribute. If the process
then reads this mapping, won't it entirely bypass the parent driver's power
management (like xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active) and hardware synchronization?
If the device is in a low-power state, an unpowered MMIO read might cause a
system-level PCIe bus hang, or read corrupt state if the SoC re-mapper is not
configured.
Should mmap support on the sysfs attribute be disabled when a read_telem
callback is present?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909154739.1515514-22-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 15:47 [PATCH v7 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support EAGAIN return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:01 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:03 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-10 18:55 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev9) Patchwork
2026-09-09 15:57 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox