From: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
jouni.hogander@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/10] drm/xe/pm: clear PME HPD flag on runtime suspend error handler
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:04:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911080448.778316-9-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911080448.778316-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
The HPD can generate PME flag in the intel_hotplug is set based
one PME status during early pm_runtime_suspend routine before
any IRQ reset calls and cleared during early pm_runtime_resume()
before any IRQ reset/resume calls. But in case of any error
scenario during xe_pm_runtime_suspend(), we end up in a situation
where this flag is never cleared in the "out_resume" path.
So change to global scope for intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_clear_pme()
and get it called from the error handler path as well. To have
this in cleanly, get it wrapped with corresponding xe_display wrapper.
The alternative could be to call the clear the flag from both
runtime_resume_early() and the late runtime_resume(). But the
former approach seems clean.
Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 7 +++++++
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
index 263eb3e08ea1..99aaceb39048 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display)
intel_hpd_poll_enable(display);
}
-static void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_clear_pme(struct intel_display *display)
+void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_clear_pme(struct intel_display *display)
{
intel_hpd_set_pme_capable(display, false);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
index 1ae2ad7e95f6..51f82b6fb2f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ void intel_display_driver_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_resume_early(struct intel_display *display);
+void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_clear_pme(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_resume(struct intel_display *display);
#endif /* __INTEL_DISPLAY_DRIVER_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 7b25c0814674..79166aeeed85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -409,6 +409,15 @@ void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_resume(display);
}
+void xe_display_clear_pme_hpd(struct xe_device *xe)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
+
+ if (!xe->info.probe_display)
+ return;
+
+ intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_clear_pme(display);
+}
static void display_device_remove(struct drm_device *dev, void *arg)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index 0babb50bfc77..92bb5ee76e06 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume_early(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
+void xe_display_clear_pme_hpd(struct xe_device *xe);
#define XE_DISPLAY_DRIVER_FEATURES (DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_ATOMIC)
#define XE_DISPLAY_DRIVER_OPS \
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static inline void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_pm_runtime_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume_early(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe) {}
+static inline void xe_display_clear_pme_hpd(struct xe_device *xe) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY */
#endif /* _XE_DISPLAY_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
index c79f55b66a41..5e7263316683 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
@@ -663,6 +663,13 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
return 0;
out_resume:
+ /*
+ * We need to explicitly clear the PME HPD flag in this error handler.
+ * Normally this is set during early runtime suspend and cleared during
+ * early runtime resume call.
+ */
+ xe_display_clear_pme_hpd(xe);
+
xe_display_pm_runtime_resume(xe);
xe_pxp_pm_resume(xe->pxp);
out:
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 8:04 [PATCH v5 00/10] pm_pme support on display hotplug Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] drm/xe/pm: initialize the device's system wakeup capabilities Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] drm/xe/pm: introduce PM PME support Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] drm/xe/pm: avoid reclaim when arming PME wakeup Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: add pme_enabled() to the parent interface Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_enabed implementation for xe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] drm/i915/hotplug: add helpers to track HPDs can generate PME Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 13:00 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-11 15:36 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] drm/i915: plug the pm runtime handlers with PME HPD handling Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:04 ` Vinod Govindapillai [this message]
2026-09-11 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] drm/xe/pm: clear PME HPD flag on runtime suspend error handler sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] drm/i915/irq: conditional HPD IRQ resets based on PME capability Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] drm/i915/hotplug: avoid HPD polling if the device is PME capable Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-11 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 8:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for pm_pme support on display hotplug (rev5) Patchwork
2026-09-11 9:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-11 15:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911080448.778316-9-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
--to=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox