From: "Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of the fair sched config function
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914084044.c4mwuzixmffdkkis@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911183257.14999-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> wrote on pią [2026-wrz-11 20:32:57 +0200]:
> We will soon want to auto provision all VFs in a single step, while
> already holding the master mutex. Split existing function into two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> index 146981aedf5f..6947aeed458e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> @@ -2784,15 +2784,16 @@ static bool pf_needs_provision_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> #define XE_ADMIN_PF_SCHED_PRIORITY GUC_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH
>
> /**
> - * xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched() - Provision PF and VFs with fair scheduling.
> + * xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched_locked() - Provision PF and VFs with fair scheduling.
> * @gt: the &xe_gt
> * @num_vfs: number of VFs to provision (can't be 0)
> *
> + * The caller must hold the master PF mutex.
> * This function can only be called on PF.
> *
> * Return: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> */
> -int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> +int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched_locked(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> {
> int result = 0;
> int err;
> @@ -2801,7 +2802,7 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> xe_gt_assert(gt, XE_FAIR_EXEC_QUANTUM_MS);
> xe_gt_assert(gt, XE_FAIR_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_US);
>
> - guard(mutex)(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> + lockdep_assert_held(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
>
> if (!pf_needs_provision_sched(gt, num_vfs))
> return 0;
> @@ -2822,6 +2823,22 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> return result;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched() - Provision PF and VFs with fair scheduling.
> + * @gt: the &xe_gt
> + * @num_vfs: number of VFs to provision (can't be 0)
> + *
> + * This function can only be called on PF.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs)
> +{
> + guard(mutex)(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> +
> + return xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched_locked(gt, num_vfs);
> +}
> +
> static int pf_provision_threshold(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid,
> enum xe_guc_klv_threshold_index index, u32 value)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.h
> index d43da8599977..3e10697d2174 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_threshold(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid,
> enum xe_guc_klv_threshold_index index, u32 value);
>
> int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs);
> +int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair_sched_locked(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int num_vfs);
> int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_set_fair(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid, unsigned int num_vfs);
> int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_sanitize(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid, long timeout);
> int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_release(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid, bool force);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 18:32 [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of config functions Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of the priority config function Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-14 8:28 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2026-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of the release " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-14 8:36 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2026-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of the fair sched " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-14 8:40 ` Piotr Piórkowski [this message]
2026-09-11 19:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Add _locked variant of config functions Patchwork
2026-09-11 19:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-12 4:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914084044.c4mwuzixmffdkkis@intel.com \
--to=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox