From: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jouni.hogander@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] pm_pme support on display hotplug
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 23:40:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914204034.309566-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> (raw)
Introduce PME support for PME capable devices and avoid
HPD polling on runtime suspend. For PME capable devices
HPD will trigger PME which will wakeup the system. And
rest of the runtime resume call is same as before.
v2: Instead of plumbing keep_hpd and pme_capability to
the existing interfaces, a separate helper function to
set and get pme capability is added.
HPD polling is handled directly inside the
intel_hpd_poll_enable() based on the pme capability
flag
v3: Lockdep related splats were observed during some rare testing
scenarios. The PCI PME api to enable wake internally use kmalloc
and can trigger deadlocks. So the calls to the PCI PME APIs are
updated and placed within the no reclaim loop. Also any display
specific calls are isolated within xe / i915 blocks and display
parent interface is used to tackle the inter dependencies to
keep the display module design clean.
v4: No need to maintaining another variable to keep track of PME
can be generated from HPD in intel_hotplug. Instead the parent
interface function can be used directly to get the xe.pme.enabled
to know PME is enabled and configure the IRQ resets and HPD polling
v5: Rebased
Vinod Govindapillai (7):
drm/xe/pm: initialize the device's system wakeup capabilities
drm/xe/pm: introduce PM PME support
drm/xe/pm: avoid reclaim when arming PME wakeup
drm/i915: add pme_enabled() to the parent interface
drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_enabed implementation for xe
drm/i915/irq: conditional HPD IRQ resets based on PME capability
drm/i915/hotplug: avoid HPD polling if the device is PME capable
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c | 19 +++++----
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 7 ++++
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 5 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c | 6 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 13 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 26 ++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h | 2 +
include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h | 1 +
10 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 20:40 Vinod Govindapillai [this message]
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] drm/xe/pm: initialize the device's system wakeup capabilities Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] drm/xe/pm: introduce PM PME support Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 7:43 ` Raag Jadav
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] drm/xe/pm: avoid reclaim when arming PME wakeup Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] drm/i915: add pme_enabled() to the parent interface Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] drm/i915/xe: plug the pme_enabed implementation for xe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] drm/i915/irq: conditional HPD IRQ resets based on PME capability Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 21:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 20:40 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] drm/i915/hotplug: avoid HPD polling if the device is PME capable Vinod Govindapillai
2026-09-14 20:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for pm_pme support on display hotplug (rev7) Patchwork
2026-09-14 21:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-15 2:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914204034.309566-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
--to=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox