Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Zhou <zhoulol888@gmail.com>
To: "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Andrew Zhou <zhoulol888@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/display: Remove invalid initial plane PTE check for iGPU
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:42:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915064200.23171-1-zhoulol888@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905142500.17666-1-zhoulol888@gmail.com>

Pantherlake integrated graphics can have the XE_GGTT_PTEDM bit set in
the BIOS-initialised framebuffer PTE. The validation rejects this and
fails to create the initial framebuffer, resulting in static.

Remove the too-strict validation. Since this was the only caller of
need_pte_local() outside the DGFX path, the helper is now
unconditionally true there; fold the check and drop the dead
need_pte_local() and has_lmembar() helpers.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Zhou <zhoulol888@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Zhou <zhoulol888@gmail.com>
Tested-on: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, integrated graphics, B0 stepping
---
v1 -> v2:
- Drop need_pte_local() and has_lmembar(), now dead after removing the
  iGPU validation (sashiko)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c | 20 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
index 0f86b7303..3484b3033 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
@@ -27,16 +27,6 @@ static bool is_pte_local(u64 pte)
 	return pte & XE_GGTT_PTE_DM;
 }
 
-static bool has_lmembar(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	return GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1270;
-}
-
-static bool need_pte_local(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	return IS_DGFX(xe) || has_lmembar(xe);
-}
-
 static struct xe_bo *
 initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
 		 struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
@@ -60,7 +50,7 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
 	if (IS_DGFX(xe)) {
 		u64 pte = xe_ggtt_read_pte(tile0->mem.ggtt, base);
 
-		if (is_pte_local(pte) != need_pte_local(xe)) {
+		if (!is_pte_local(pte)) {
 			drm_err(&xe->drm, "Initial plane PTE has bad local memory bit\n");
 			return NULL;
 		}
@@ -85,7 +75,6 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
 			    &phys_base);
 	} else {
 		struct ttm_resource_manager *stolen;
-		u64 pte;
 
 		stolen = ttm_manager_type(&xe->ttm, XE_PL_STOLEN);
 		if (!stolen) {
@@ -93,13 +82,6 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
 			return NULL;
 		}
 
-		pte = xe_ggtt_read_pte(tile0->mem.ggtt, base);
-
-		if (is_pte_local(pte) != need_pte_local(xe)) {
-			drm_err(&xe->drm, "Initial plane PTE has bad local memory bit\n");
-			return NULL;
-		}
-
 		phys_base = base;
 		flags |= XE_BO_FLAG_STOLEN;
 
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-05 14:25 [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Remove invalid initial plane PTE check for iGPU Andrew Zhou
2026-09-05 14:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 18:38 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
2026-09-15  6:42 ` Andrew Zhou [this message]
2026-09-15  8:40   ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2026-09-15 13:59     ` Activate Windows
2026-09-18 13:54       ` Activate Windows
2026-09-15 14:14 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for drm/xe/display: Remove invalid initial plane PTE check for iGPU (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260915064200.23171-1-zhoulol888@gmail.com \
    --to=zhoulol888@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox