From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/xe/guc: Skip timeout recovery on a wedged device
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:46:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922101721.1583542-14-arvind.yadav@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922101721.1583542-1-arvind.yadav@intel.com>
A scheduler timeout can still run after the device has been declared
wedged. guc_submit_hint_wedged() only returns true for the no-reset
debug mode, so other wedge modes can continue into GuC timeout recovery.
The killed-queue case already preserves an existing wedge. Extend the
same check to non-killed queues, where guc_submit_hint_wedged() returns
false outside the no-reset debug mode.
If the device is already wedged, use the existing wedged cleanup path
and avoid further hardware recovery. This also avoids the
kernel-submitted job timeout warning seen after wedge isolation.
The timeout was observed as:
[ 8939.200065] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Tile0: GT0: Kernel-submitted job timed out
[ 8939.200066] WARNING: xe_guc_submit.c:1683 at guc_exec_queue_timedout_job+0x1160/0x2550
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
index 664008d21914..da2d4fa02a77 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
@@ -1596,10 +1596,9 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
* Killed queues must not newly wedge the device, but preserve an
* already-wedged state to avoid warning on teardown timeouts.
*/
- if (!exec_queue_killed(q))
+ wedged = xe_device_wedged(xe);
+ if (!wedged && !exec_queue_killed(q))
wedged = guc_submit_hint_wedged(exec_queue_to_guc(q));
- else
- wedged = xe_device_wedged(xe);
/*
* Only tag as GPU hang if this is the original timeout, not a
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 10:16 [PATCH v2 00/15] drm/xe: Isolate wedged devices from hardware access Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/xe/irq: Always free requested IRQs on uninstall Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] drm/drv: Export drm_dev_srcu_synchronize() Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/xe: Separate AER reset state from device wedging Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/xe: Protect device I/O with DRM device SRCU Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] drm/xe: Drop queued page faults when device I/O is blocked Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] drm/xe: Stop VM work " Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/xe: Send wedged notification from a worker Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/xe: Reuse one dummy page per BO after wedge Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] drm/xe: Invalidate existing VRAM mappings on wedge Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/xe/irq: Protect IRQ state during wedge isolation Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] drm/xe: Isolate a wedged device before notifying userspace Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/xe/ttm: Reject VRAM allocations on wedged devices Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` Arvind Yadav [this message]
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/xe: Skip PM notifier preparation when device I/O is blocked Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/xe: Block BO VM access when device I/O is unavailable Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Isolate wedged devices from hardware access (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-22 12:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-22 20:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922101721.1583542-14-arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--to=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox