From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 18:29:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923182945.CB55D1F0089E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923181115.2514193-27-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] intel_aet: silent telemetry read failure for PMT devices using callbacks
--
commit 43eab3aee86b2e3202e1e7b01c4ce97411570441
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Subject: platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
A callback indicates that the parent driver is responsible for accessing
the data area. Creating a PMT memory remap is redundant. If a read_telem
callback has been provided, do not create a remap.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index 402d51df834a6..1c7a372b4fc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,14 +403,19 @@ static int intel_pmt_dev_register(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> if (!entry->size)
> return 0;
>
> - res.start = entry->base_addr;
> - res.end = res.start + entry->size - 1;
> - res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + /*
> + * The read_telem callback is responsible for this mapping, and may have
> + * different requirements for use. If the callback is present do not
> + * create the map.
> + */
> + if (!(entry->cb && entry->cb->read_telem)) {
> + struct resource res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(entry->base_addr, entry->size);
>
> - entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> - goto fail_ioremap;
> + entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> + goto fail_ioremap;
> + }
> }
>
[Severity: Medium]
When a read_telem callback is provided, entry->base remains NULL.
Could this silently break telemetry reads for Intel AET?
If entry->base is NULL, it propagates to the telemetry endpoint:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry.c:pmt_telem_add_endpoint() {
...
ep->base = entry->base;
...
}
Then pmt_copy_region() populates the telemetry region with this NULL address:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry.c:pmt_copy_region() {
...
region->addr = entry->ep->base;
...
}
Finally, in intel_aet_read_event(), the region is skipped because the address is
NULL:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c:intel_aet_read_event() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < e->pfg->count; i++) {
if (!e->pfg->regions[i].addr)
continue;
...
}
Because Intel AET strictly requires direct MMIO, it cannot support abstracted
callbacks. This results in a silent failure to collect telemetry data from
AET-monitored devices that use callbacks, since intel_aet_read_event() will
skip the region and return -EINVAL on every read request.
> sysfs_bin_attr_init(&entry->pmt_bin_attr);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923181115.2514193-22-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 18:11 [PATCH v11 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29 13:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update VSEC probe order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 4:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-30 12:57 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-30 13:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v11 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-23 18:20 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev13) Patchwork
2026-09-23 18:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-23 20:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-24 8:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v11 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Ilpo Järvinen
2026-09-29 13:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-30 6:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923182945.CB55D1F0089E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox