From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: mpenttil@redhat.com
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 01/11] mm/Kconfig: changes for migrate on fault for device pages
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:11:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924071116.60FA71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924065313.899730-2-mpenttil@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] mm: DEVICE_MIGRATION selects HMM_MIRROR without depends on MMU constraint
--
commit d98d7483ad3c2031ffcf056a41d08580cd84769d
Author: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
mm/Kconfig: changes for migrate on fault for device pages
This commit modifies the memory management Kconfig to have DEVICE_MIGRATION
explicitly select HMM_MIRROR. This ensures HMM is enabled for the unified
HMM and migrate_device page table walks.
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 604c58199acbf..b7a485beb9a78 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ config MIGRATION
>
> config DEVICE_MIGRATION
> def_bool MIGRATION && ZONE_DEVICE
> + select HMM_MIRROR
[Severity: Low]
Does selecting HMM_MIRROR under DEVICE_MIGRATION require an explicit
dependency on MMU?
When a Kconfig symbol uses select, it is expected to have dependencies
compatible with the selected symbol's dependencies. HMM_MIRROR explicitly
depends on MMU, but DEVICE_MIGRATION lacks an explicit depends on MMU or
depends on MIGRATION constraint.
While DEVICE_MIGRATION is currently only enabled via its default expression
which transitively requires MMU, a default value expression does not act as
a dependency constraint against a select operation. If a future patch were
to forcefully select DEVICE_MIGRATION on a non-MMU architecture, it would
bypass the def_bool and enable HMM_MIRROR without its required MMU
dependency.
Could this structural risk be avoided by adding an explicit depends on MMU
to DEVICE_MIGRATION?
> config ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION
> bool
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924065313.899730-1-mpenttil@redhat.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 6:53 [PATCH v15 00/11] migrate on fault for device pages mpenttil
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 01/11] mm/Kconfig: changes for " mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 02/11] mm: add helper to convert HMM pfn to migrate pfn mpenttil
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 03/11] mm/hmm: preparations for HMM to participate in migration mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 04/11] mm/hmm: do the plumbing " mpenttil
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 05/11] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pte level mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 06/11] mm/hmm: migrate collection in HMM pagewalk - pmd level mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 07/11] mm/hmm: add lazy MMU mode support for migration in HMM pagewalk mpenttil
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 08/11] mm/hmm: implement rollback for device page " mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 09/11] mm: enable device page migration from " mpenttil
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 10/11] lib/test_hmm: add a new testcase for the migrate on fault mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 6:53 ` [PATCH v15 11/11] Documentation/mm/hmm: document migration through hmm_range_fault() mpenttil
2026-09-24 7:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Migrate on fault for device pages (rev7) Patchwork
2026-09-24 7:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-24 7:46 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-09-24 8:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-09-24 21:10 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-25 9:07 ` [PATCH v15 00/11] migrate on fault for device pages Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-25 10:23 ` Mika Penttilä
2026-09-25 12:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-25 13:22 ` Mika Penttilä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924071116.60FA71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox