Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Brian Nguyen" <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Implement print vfunc for page fault info logging
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 23:38:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925233853.399E01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925232757.3456172-2-brian3.nguyen@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] xe: log interleaving and redundant prefixes due to split print calls
--

commit 114cd7fd731f9ee67d8c36081ae1b0f44d9be562
Author: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>

drm/xe: Implement print vfunc for page fault info logging

This commit adds a print vfunc to xe_pagefault_ops to let producer
backends log specific relevant debug info. This keeps the consumer
layer free of backend-specific formatting logic, with consumer-specific
prints handled separately.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c
> @@ -607,35 +606,9 @@ static const char *xe_pagefault_error_to_str(enum xe_pagefault_error error)
>  
>  static void xe_pagefault_print(struct xe_pagefault *pf)
>  {

[ ... ]

> -		   FIELD_GET(XE_PAGEFAULT_ENGINE_INSTANCE_MASK,
> -			     pf->consumer.engine_class_instance),
> -		   FIELD_GET(XE_PAGEFAULT_SRCID_MASK,
> -			     pf->consumer.id),
> +	xe_gt_assert(pf->gt, pf->producer.ops->print);
> +	pf->producer.ops->print(pf);
> +	xe_gt_info(pf->gt, "\tError: %s\n",
>  		   xe_pagefault_error_to_str(xe_pagefault_get_error(pf)));
>  }

[Severity: Low]
Does this split print call cause log interleaving and redundant prefixes?

Because the error string is now logged with a separate call to xe_gt_info()
in xe_pagefault_print(), it will be printed as an isolated log entry with
its own prefix, rather than forming a continuous atomic block with the fault
details from the producer print vfunc.

This disrupts the formatting of the page fault debug info, introducing
redundant logging prefixes in the middle of what used to be a single
continuous multiline log block. It also creates a risk of concurrent kernel
messages interleaving with the output.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925232757.3456172-2-brian3.nguyen@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25 23:27 [PATCH] drm/xe: Implement print vfunc for page fault info logging Brian Nguyen
2026-09-25 23:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-26  2:18   ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-28 17:27     ` Nguyen, Brian3
2026-09-25 23:53 ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260925233853.399E01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox