Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Naladala Ramanaidu" <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/gmbus: Add bit-banging debugfs control
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 12:24:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928122438.AF9211F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928121940.728102-2-ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] i915: gmbus force_bit counter leak via concurrent debugfs writes
--

commit f09d193c0d7afc5fe7e1a110befe13bd976b0393
Author: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>

drm/i915/gmbus: Add bit-banging debugfs control

This commit adds a debugfs interface, intel_force_bit_banging, to allow
enabling or disabling I2C bit-banging for Intel GMBUS adapters directly
from userspace.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -871,6 +873,71 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm gmbus_algorithm = {
[ ... ]
> +static ssize_t intel_force_bit_banging_write(struct file *file,
> +						     const char __user *ubuf,
> +						     size_t len, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> +	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> +	struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
> +	struct intel_gmbus *bus = container_of(connector->base.ddc,
> +					       struct intel_gmbus, adapter);
> +	bool force_bit_banging;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtobool_from_user(ubuf, len, &force_bit_banging);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (force_bit_banging != bus->debugfs_force_bit) {
> +		intel_gmbus_force_bit(connector->base.ddc, force_bit_banging);
> +		bus->debugfs_force_bit = force_bit_banging;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
Could this check-then-act block cause an issue if multiple threads write to
the debugfs file concurrently?

Since there is no lock protecting the read of bus->debugfs_force_bit and
the subsequent update, concurrent writes could see the same value for
bus->debugfs_force_bit and call intel_gmbus_force_bit() multiple times.

Because intel_gmbus_force_bit() manages a reference counter internally:

void intel_gmbus_force_bit(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, bool force_bit)
{
	...
	bus->force_bit += force_bit ? 1 : -1;
	...
}

Redundant calls could permanently leak or underflow the bus->force_bit
counter, locking the GMBUS adapter into bit-banging mode and corrupting
the hardware transfer strategy. While debugfs is typically restricted to
root, a concurrent write sequence could still trigger this.

> +
> +	*offp += len;
> +
> +	return len;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928121940.728102-1-ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 12:19 [PATCH v3 0/1] drm/i915/gmbus: Add bit-banging debugfs control Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-09-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-09-28 12:24   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-28 16:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/gmbus: Add bit-banging debugfs control (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-28 16:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-28 17:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-28 22:12 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928122438.AF9211F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox