From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Satyanarayana K V P" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe/vf: New approach for post-migration LRC fixups
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 16:56:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106155615.977330-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com> (raw)
The current approach to LRC recovery requires caution from developers
when modifying any LRC-related code. More flexible solution may allow
to avoid future troubles.
The current code also includes LRC creation repeat which looks a bit
suspicious - it was developed without detailed knowledge of which
part of LRC creation requires a repeat. Now after extensive debug we
know that the repeat is only required for BO mapping, and actually
all BOs should be protected, not only the ones storing LRCs.
This fixes a very rare bug where BO would be incorrectly created
during migration resulting in CAT error generated by GPU. Chances
of triggering this error were well below 0.1%.
v2: A rebase after 6 months, with adjustments to current source.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Tomasz Lis (2):
drm/xe/vf: Late fixups of LRCs after VF migration
drm/xe: After VF migration, repeat BO mapping in progress
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 55 +++++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 17 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c | 6 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 35 +++------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h | 2 -
7 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 15:56 Tomasz Lis [this message]
2026-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/vf: Late fixups of LRCs after VF migration Tomasz Lis
2026-11-06 16:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: After VF migration, repeat BO mapping in progress Tomasz Lis
2026-11-06 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 16:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/vf: New approach for post-migration LRC fixups (rev2) Patchwork
2026-11-06 17:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106155615.977330-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com \
--to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox