From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Shifting GGTT area post migration
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:42:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20a2a74a-4cbc-43c9-a993-ea69a4942216@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417234239.3786508-3-tomasz.lis@intel.com>
On 18.04.2025 01:42, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> We have only one GGTT for all IOV functions, with each VF having assigned
> a range of addresses for its use. After migration, a VF can receive a
> different range of addresses than it had initially.
>
> This implements shifting GGTT addresses within drm_mm nodes, so that
> VMAs stay valid after migration. This will make the driver use new
> addresses when accessing GGTT from the moment the shifting ends.
>
> By taking the ggtt->lock for the period of VMA fixups, this change
> also adds constraint on that mutex. Any locks used during the recovery
> cannot ever wait for hardware response - because after migration,
> the hardware will not do anything until fixups are finished.
>
> v2: Moved some functs to xe_ggtt.c; moved shift computation to just
> after querying; improved documentation; switched some warns to asserts;
> skipping fixups when GGTT shift eq 0; iterating through tiles (Michal)
> v3: Updated kerneldocs, removed unused funct, properly allocate
> balloning nodes if non existent
> v4: Re-used ballooning functions from VF init, used bool in place of
> standard error codes
> v5: Renamed one function
> v6: Subject tag change, several kerneldocs updated, some functions
> renamed, some moved, added several asserts, shuffled declarations
> of variables, revealed more detail in high level functions
> v7: Fixed typos, added `_locked` suffix to some functs, improved
> readability of asserts, removed unneeded conditional
> v8: Moved one function, removed implementation detail from kerneldoc,
> added asserts
> v9: Code shuffling without much change, and one param rename
> v10: Minor error path change, added printing the shift via debugfs
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 23:42 [PATCH v11 0/4] drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of GGTT nodes and CTB Tomasz Lis
2025-04-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] drm/xe/vf: Divide GGTT ballooning into allocation and insertion Tomasz Lis
2025-04-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Shifting GGTT area post migration Tomasz Lis
2025-04-18 12:42 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-04-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce enum with offsets for context register H2Gs Tomasz Lis
2025-04-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] drm/xe/vf: Fixup CTB send buffer messages after migration Tomasz Lis
2025-04-18 12:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-18 13:28 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-04-18 0:22 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of GGTT nodes and CTB Patchwork
2025-04-18 0:23 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 0:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 0:32 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 0:35 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 0:36 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 1:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-18 19:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20a2a74a-4cbc-43c9-a993-ea69a4942216@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox