From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com,
"Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
"Suraj Kandpal" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/psr: add LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED() register bit helper
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:32:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22934fee1ea37c777c35e4b520d5f11b6cd953d0.1730201504.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1730201504.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
Drop the wa_16013835468_bit_get() function in favour of the register
macro. It doesn't have to be so complicated, and we don't have to use
the workaround name in everything that's related to it.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 24 ++++--------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 13 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index 880ea845207f..e018a0868009 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1773,23 +1773,6 @@ static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
intel_dp->psr.active = true;
}
-static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
-{
- switch (intel_dp->psr.pipe) {
- case PIPE_A:
- return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A;
- case PIPE_B:
- return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B;
- case PIPE_C:
- return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C;
- case PIPE_D:
- return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_D;
- default:
- MISSING_CASE(intel_dp->psr.pipe);
- return 0;
- }
-}
-
/*
* Wa_16013835468
* Wa_14015648006
@@ -1798,6 +1781,7 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
+ enum pipe pipe = intel_dp->psr.pipe;
bool set_wa_bit = false;
/* Wa_14015648006 */
@@ -1811,10 +1795,10 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
if (set_wa_bit)
intel_de_rmw(display, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
- 0, wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
+ 0, LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED(pipe));
else
intel_de_rmw(display, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
- wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
+ LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED(pipe), 0);
}
static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
@@ -2105,7 +2089,7 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11)
intel_de_rmw(display, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
- wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
+ LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED(intel_dp->psr.pipe), 0);
if (intel_dp->psr.sel_update_enabled) {
/* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 405f409e9761..a51dab9c4978 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2861,11 +2861,16 @@
#define RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE REG_BIT(4)
#define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1 _MMIO(0x46430)
-#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_D REG_BIT(31)
+#define _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_D REG_BIT(31)
#define SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT REG_BIT(30)
-#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C REG_BIT(25)
-#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B REG_BIT(24)
-#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A REG_BIT(23)
+#define _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C REG_BIT(25)
+#define _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B REG_BIT(24)
+#define _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A REG_BIT(23)
+#define LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED(pipe) _PICK((pipe), \
+ _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A, \
+ _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B, \
+ _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C, \
+ _LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_D)
#define ICL_DELAY_PMRSP REG_BIT(22)
#define DISABLE_FLR_SRC REG_BIT(15)
#define MASK_WAKEMEM REG_BIT(13)
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 11:32 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/psr: minor cleanups Jani Nikula
2024-10-29 11:32 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-10-29 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/psr: stop using bitwise OR with booleans in wm_optimization_wa() Jani Nikula
2024-10-29 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/psr: clarify intel_psr_pre_plane_update() conditions Jani Nikula
2024-10-29 12:40 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/psr: minor cleanups Patchwork
2024-10-29 12:41 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 12:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 12:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 12:56 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 12:57 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-29 13:44 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:30 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-31 6:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22934fee1ea37c777c35e4b520d5f11b6cd953d0.1730201504.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox