From: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
<riana.tauro@intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
<paul.e.luse@intel.com>, <mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com>,
<kam.nasim@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:19:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23ded605-a085-42b3-bc71-af3178d07bc7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVRh5o7gifmgkFdF@soc-5CG1426VCC.clients.intel.com>
On 12/31/2025 5:06 AM, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 07:17:23AM -0800, Anoop, Vijay wrote:
>> From: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
>>
>> Add a new system controller (sysctrl) component for Intel Xe3p dGPU
>> platforms.
>>
>> This component provides the foundational infrastructure for communication
>> with the System Controller firmware using MKHI protocol over a mailbox
>> interface.
>>
>> Key features introduced:
>> - Detection and initialization of System Controller interface on Xe3p
>> dGPU platforms
>> - Mailbox communication with System Controller firmware
>> - Fragmented message transfer for large command payloads
>>
>> This implementation establishes the base for future System Controller
>> feature
>> enablement and firmware command handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
>
> Commit message should follow '75 chars per line' format. In general,
> please look at the CI.Hooks and CI.checkpatch warnings/errors and fix
> those.
>
> checkpatch can be run before posting:
> https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/checkpatch.html
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h | 44 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 5 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 6 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c | 64 ++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.h | 13 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c | 438 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h | 61 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_types.h | 25 ++
>> 11 files changed, 661 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_types.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> index 3315f93a35b2..cd03e4c53127 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>> xe_step.o \
>> xe_survivability_mode.o \
>> xe_sync.o \
>> + xe_sysctrl.o \
>> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox.o \
>> xe_tile.o \
>> xe_tile_sysfs.o \
>> xe_tlb_inval.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/
>> drm/xe/regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b31b6e24c18e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _XE_SYSCTRL_REGS_H_
>> +#define _XE_SYSCTRL_REGS_H_
>> +
>> +#include "xe_regs.h"
>> +
>> +#define SYSCTRL_BASE_OFFSET 0xDB000
>> +#define SYSCTRL_BASE (SOC_BASE + SYSCTRL_BASE_OFFSET)
>> +#define SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_INDEX 0x03
>> +#define SC_BAR_LENGTH 0x1000
>> +
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x10)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY REG_BIT(31)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_IRQ REG_BIT(30)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT REG_BIT(29)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM3_MASK REG_GENMASK(28, 24)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM2_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM1_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
>> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_COMMAND_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +
>> +#define SC_MB_DATA0 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x14)
>> +#define SC_MB_DATA1 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x18)
>> +#define SC_MB_DATA2 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x1C)
>> +#define SC_MB_DATA3 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x20)
>> +
>> +#define MKHI_FRAME_PHASE REG_BIT(24)
>> +#define MKHI_FRAME_CURRENT_MASK REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
>> +#define MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL_MASK REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
>> +#define MKHI_FRAME_COMMAND_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +
>> +#define SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE 16
>> +#define SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES 64
>> +#define SC_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE (SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE *
>> SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES)
>> +#define SC_MKHI_COMMAND 5
>> +
>> +#define SC_MB_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 500
>> +#define SC_MB_RETRY_TIMEOUT_MS 20
>> +#define SC_MB_POLL_INTERVAL_US 100
>> +
>> +#endif /* _XE_SYSCTRL_REGS_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_device.c
>> index e101d290b2a6..805d48dd954d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
>> #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
>> #include "xe_sriov.h"
>> #include "xe_svm.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
>> #include "xe_tile.h"
>> #include "xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.h"
>> #include "xe_ttm_sys_mgr.h"
>> @@ -1032,6 +1033,10 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>> if (err)
>> goto err_unregister_display;
>>
>> + err = xe_sysctrl_init(xe);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_unregister_display;
>> +
>> err = xe_device_sysfs_init(xe);
>> if (err)
>> goto err_unregister_display;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/
>> xe/xe_device_types.h
>> index a85be9ba175e..6295b2c35d4a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include "xe_sriov_vf_ccs_types.h"
>> #include "xe_step_types.h"
>> #include "xe_survivability_mode_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl_types.h"
>> #include "xe_tile_sriov_vf_types.h"
>> #include "xe_validation.h"
>>
>> @@ -340,6 +341,8 @@ struct xe_device {
>> u8 has_soc_remapper_telem:1;
>> /** @info.has_sriov: Supports SR-IOV */
>> u8 has_sriov:1;
>> + /** @info.has_sysctrl: Supports System Controller */
>> + u8 has_sysctrl:1;
>> /** @info.has_usm: Device has unified shared memory support */
>> u8 has_usm:1;
>> /** @info.has_64bit_timestamp: Device supports 64-bit
>> timestamps */
>> @@ -606,6 +609,9 @@ struct xe_device {
>> /** @heci_gsc: graphics security controller */
>> struct xe_heci_gsc heci_gsc;
>>
>> + /** @sc: System Controller */
>> + struct xe_sysctrl sc;
>> +
>> /** @nvm: discrete graphics non-volatile memory */
>> struct intel_dg_nvm_dev *nvm;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> index 91e0553a8163..b6dc3030b673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc cri_desc = {
>> .has_soc_remapper_sysctrl = true,
>> .has_soc_remapper_telem = true,
>> .has_sriov = true,
>> + .has_sysctrl = true,
>> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
>> .require_force_probe = true,
>> .va_bits = 57,
>> @@ -701,6 +702,7 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>> xe->info.has_soc_remapper_telem = desc->has_soc_remapper_telem;
>> xe->info.has_sriov = xe_configfs_primary_gt_allowed(to_pci_dev(xe-
>> >drm.dev)) &&
>> desc->has_sriov;
>> + xe->info.has_sysctrl = desc->has_sysctrl;
>> xe->info.has_mem_copy_instr = desc->has_mem_copy_instr;
>> xe->info.skip_guc_pc = desc->skip_guc_pc;
>> xe->info.skip_mtcfg = desc->skip_mtcfg;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_pci_types.h
>> index 5f20f56571d1..53e44a32883d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
>> u8 has_soc_remapper_sysctrl:1;
>> u8 has_soc_remapper_telem:1;
>> u8 has_sriov:1;
>> + u8 has_sysctrl:1;
>> u8 needs_scratch:1;
>> u8 skip_guc_pc:1;
>> u8 skip_mtcfg:1;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_sysctrl.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9f3e0b1db380
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
>
> The above header should just be placed in alphabetical order below.
>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>> +
>> +#include "regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h"
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +#include "xe_printk.h"
>> +#include "xe_soc_remapper.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl_types.h"
>> +
>> +static void xe_sysctrl_fini(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_sysctrl *sc = arg;
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>
> You could use a helper and replace it everywhere with sc_to_xe(sc):
>
> static struct xe_device *sc_to_xe(struct xe_sysctrl *sc)
> {
> return container_of(sc, struct xe_device, sc);
> }
>
>> +
>> + if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_sysctrl_region)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + xe->soc_remapper.set_sysctrl_region(xe, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_sysctrl_init - Initialize SC subsystem
>> + * @xe: xe device instance
>> + *
>> + * Entry point for SC initialization, called from xe_device_probe().
>> + * This function checks platform support and initializes the system
>> controller.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, error code on failure
>> + */
>> +int xe_sysctrl_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_sysctrl *sc = &xe->sc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!xe->info.has_sysctrl)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_sysctrl_fini, sc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_sysctrl_region)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + xe->soc_remapper.set_sysctrl_region(xe, SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_INDEX);
>> +
>> + ret = drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &sc->cmd_lock);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init(sc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/
>> xe_sysctrl.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..f1ad12656e48
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _XE_SYSCTRL_H_
>> +#define _XE_SYSCTRL_H_
>> +
>> +struct xe_device;
>> +
>> +int xe_sysctrl_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>> +
>> +#endif /* _XE_SYSCTRL_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c b/drivers/gpu/
>> drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e9f4d4b13bb1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> Do you still need this one? Can you also double check if all headers
> here are needed.
>
>> +
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
>> +#include "xe_pm.h"
>> +#include "xe_printk.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h"
>> +#include "xe_sysctrl_types.h"
>> +#include "regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h"
>> +
>> +static bool xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_clear(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> u32 bit_mask,
>> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32_not(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL,
>> bit_mask, bit_mask,
>> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
>> +
>> + return ret == 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_set(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> u32 bit_mask,
>> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL, bit_mask,
>> bit_mask,
>> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
>> +
>> + return ret == 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_write_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> const void *frame,
>> + size_t len)
>> +{
>> + static const struct xe_reg data_regs[] = {
>> + SC_MB_DATA0, SC_MB_DATA1, SC_MB_DATA2, SC_MB_DATA3
>> + };
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + const u8 *bytes = frame;
>> + u32 reg_data;
>> + size_t i;
>> +
>> + if (len == 0 || len > SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Invalid frame len: %zu\n", len);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> This check seems redundant. You are already rounding up cmd_size to
> frames and then the frame size passed to this function can only be up to
> SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE, but not zero. If this function were called from
> outside this file, then additional checks makes sense, but it's static,
> so this check can be dropped.
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i + sizeof(u32) <= len; i += sizeof(u32)) {
>> + reg_data = *(const u32 *)(bytes + i);
>> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), data_regs[i /
>> sizeof(u32)], reg_data);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i < len) {
>> + size_t remaining = len - i;
>> + size_t j;
>> +
>> + reg_data = 0;
>> + for (j = 0; j < remaining; j++)
>> + reg_data |= (u32)bytes[i + j] << (j * 8);
>> +
>> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), data_regs[i /
>> sizeof(u32)], reg_data);
>> + }
>
> I would suggest to simplify the logic here to make it more readable,
> something
> like:
>
> static const struct xe_reg regs[] = {
> SC_MB_DATA0, SC_MB_DATA1, SC_MB_DATA2, SC_MB_DATA3
> };
> struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
> struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
> u32 dw = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, sizeof(u32));
> u32 val[SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE/4] = {0}, i;
>
> memcpy(val, frame, len);
> for (i = 0; i < dw; i++)
> xe_mmio_write32(mmio, regs[i], val[i]);
>
> return 0;
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_read_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, void
>> *frame,
>> + size_t len)
>> +{
>> + static const struct xe_reg data_regs[] = {
>> + SC_MB_DATA0, SC_MB_DATA1, SC_MB_DATA2, SC_MB_DATA3
>> + };
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + u8 *bytes = frame;
>> + u32 reg_data;
>> + size_t i;
>> +
>> + if (len == 0 || len > SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Invalid frame len: %zu\n", len);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i + sizeof(u32) <= len; i += sizeof(u32)) {
>> + reg_data = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe),
>> data_regs[i / sizeof(u32)]);
>> + *(u32 *)(bytes + i) = reg_data;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i < len) {
>> + size_t remaining = len - i;
>> + size_t j;
>> +
>> + reg_data = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe),
>> data_regs[i / sizeof(u32)]);
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < remaining; j++)
>> + bytes[i + j] = (reg_data >> (j * 8)) & 0xFF;
>> + }
>
> A logic similar to the write frame can likely be used to simplify this
> function.
>
> static const struct xe_reg regs[] = {
> SC_MB_DATA0, SC_MB_DATA1, SC_MB_DATA2, SC_MB_DATA3
> };
> struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
> struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
> u32 dw = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, sizeof(u32));
> u32 val[SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE/4] = {0}, i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dw; i++)
> val[i] = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, regs[i]);
>
> memcpy(frame, val, len);
>
> return 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_sysctrl_mailbox_clear_response(struct xe_sysctrl *sc)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + u32 ctrl_reg;
>> +
>> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL);
>> + ctrl_reg &= ~SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT;
>> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL, ctrl_reg);
>
> You could use xe_mmio_rmw32() instead.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_prepare_command(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> + u8 group_id, u8 command,
>> + const void *data_in, size_t data_in_len,
>> + u8 **cmd_buffer, size_t *cmd_size)
>> +{
>
> In the caller cmd_buffer has a different type and here it is u8**. For
> readability, I would recommend using a different name here, maybe mkhi_msg.
>
>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *mkhi_hdr;
>> + size_t size;
>> + u8 *buffer;
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>
> I would move the xe initialization to the top.
>
>> +
>> + size = sizeof(*mkhi_hdr) + data_in_len;
>> + if (size > SC_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Message too large: %zu bytes\n", size);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + buffer = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!buffer)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mkhi_hdr = (struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *)buffer;
>> + mkhi_hdr->data = cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP(MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK,
>> group_id) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_HDR_COMMAND_MASK, command &
>> 0x7F) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE, 0) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_HDR_RESERVED_MASK, 0) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_HDR_RESULT_MASK, 0));
>> +
>
> FIELD_PREPs un-aligned by one space.
>
>> + if (data_in && data_in_len)
>> + memcpy(buffer + sizeof(*mkhi_hdr), data_in, data_in_len);
>> +
>> + *cmd_buffer = buffer;
>> + *cmd_size = size;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_send_frames(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> const u8 *cmd_buffer,
>> + size_t cmd_size, unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + u32 ctrl_reg, total_frames, frame;
>> + size_t bytes_sent, frame_size;
>> +
>> + total_frames = DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd_size, SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
>> +
>> + if (!xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_clear(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY,
>> timeout_ms)) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Mailbox busy\n");
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sc->phase_bit ^= 1;
>> +
> Empty line not needed here.
>> + bytes_sent = 0;
>> +
>> + for (frame = 0; frame < total_frames; frame++) {
>> + frame_size = min(cmd_size - bytes_sent,
>> (size_t)SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
>> +
>> + if (xe_sysctrl_mailbox_write_frame(sc, cmd_buffer +
>> bytes_sent, frame_size)) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Failed to write frame %u\n", frame);
>> + return -EIO;
>
> If you failed to write the frame here, what happens to phase bit. Should
> you toggle it back?
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + ctrl_reg = SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_CURRENT_MASK, frame) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL_MASK, total_frames - 1) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_COMMAND_MASK, SC_MKHI_COMMAND) |
>> + (sc->phase_bit ? MKHI_FRAME_PHASE : 0);
>> +
>> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL, ctrl_reg);
>> +
>> + if (!xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_clear(sc,
>> SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY, timeout_ms)) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Frame %u acknowledgment timeout\n",
>> frame);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bytes_sent += frame_size;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_process_first_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> + const struct
>> xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *req_hdr,
>> + void *out,
>> + size_t frame_size,
>> + size_t *payload_bytes)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + u32 frame_data[4];
>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *resp_hdr;
>> + size_t hdr_size = sizeof(*resp_hdr);
>> + size_t payload_size;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_read_frame(sc, frame_data, frame_size);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + resp_hdr = (struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *)frame_data;
>> +
>> + if (!XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE(resp_hdr) ||
>> + XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(resp_hdr) !=
>> XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(req_hdr) ||
>> + XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_COMMAND(resp_hdr) !=
>> XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_COMMAND(req_hdr)) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "SC: Response header mismatch\n");
>> + return -EPROTO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_RESULT(resp_hdr) != 0) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "SC: Firmware error: 0x%02lx\n",
>> + XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_RESULT(resp_hdr));
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + payload_size = frame_size - hdr_size;
>> + if (payload_size > 0)
>> + memcpy(out, (u8 *)frame_data + hdr_size, payload_size);
>> +
>> + *payload_bytes = payload_size;
>> +
>> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox_clear_response(sc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_process_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> + void *out, size_t frame_size,
>> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_set(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT,
>> timeout_ms))
>
> response frame timedout message must be here.
>
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_read_frame(sc, out, frame_size);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox_clear_response(sc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_receive_frames(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> + const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr
>> *req_hdr,
>> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
>> + size_t *rdata_len, unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *mkhi_hdr;
>> + u32 ctrl_reg, total_frames, frame;
>> + size_t hdr_size = sizeof(*mkhi_hdr);
>> + u8 *out = data_out;
>> + size_t received = 0;
>> + size_t frame_size;
>> + int ret;
>
> int ret = 0;
>
>> +
>> + if (!xe_sysctrl_mailbox_wait_bit_set(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT,
>> timeout_ms)) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Response frame 0 timeout\n");
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL);
>> + total_frames = FIELD_GET(MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL_MASK, ctrl_reg) + 1;
>> +
>> + if (total_frames == 1)
>> + frame_size = min(hdr_size + data_out_len,
>> (size_t)SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
>> + else
>> + frame_size = SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_process_first_frame(sc, req_hdr, out,
>> frame_size, &received);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + out += received;
>> +
>> + for (frame = 1; frame < total_frames; frame++) {
>> + size_t remaining = data_out_len - received;
>> +
>> + frame_size = min_t(size_t, remaining, SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_process_frame(sc, out, frame_size,
>> timeout_ms);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Response frame %u timeout\n", frame);
>
> this message should be in xe_sysctrl_mailbox_process_frame.
>
> At this point you have already copied some data into the out pointer, so
> you might as well update *rdata_len with the partial copied data. So you
> can break here and return ret at the end of the function.
>
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + received += frame_size;
>> + out += frame_size;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *rdata_len = received;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>
> return ret;
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_sysctrl_mailbox_send_command(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
>> + const u8 *cmd_buffer, size_t cmd_size,
>> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
>> + size_t *rdata_len, unsigned int timeout_ms)
>> +{
>> + const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *mkhi_hdr;
>> + size_t received;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_send_frames(sc, cmd_buffer, cmd_size,
>> timeout_ms);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!data_out) {
>> + if (rdata_len)
>> + *rdata_len = 0;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> The above check should just be
>
> if (!data_out || !rdata_len)
> return 0;
>
> I would recommend writing to *rdata_len only on successful receive.
>
>> +
>> + mkhi_hdr = (const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr
>> *)cmd_buffer;
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_receive_frames(sc, mkhi_hdr, data_out,
>> data_out_len,
>> + &received, timeout_ms);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (rdata_len)
>> + *rdata_len = received;
>
> If you added the above comment, then at this point you already know
> rdata_len
> is valid, so the check can be dropped.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_sysctrl_send_command - Send command to System Controller via
>> mailbox
>> + * @handle: XE device handle
>> + * @cmd_buffer: Pointer to xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command structure
>> + * @rdata_len: Pointer to store actual response data size (can be NULL)
>> + *
>> + * Send a command to the System Controller using MKHI protocol. Handles
>> + * command preparation, fragmentation, transmission, and response
>> reception.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
>> + */
>> +int xe_sysctrl_send_command(void *handle, void *cmd_buffer, size_t
>> *rdata_len)
>> +{
>
> Why void *cmd_buffer? Do you expect anything other than
> xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command? If you do, your function signature will
> change anyways, so why not just define it as struct
> xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command *cmd?
>
We used void *cmd_buffer for flexibility and future payload support. If
a strongly typed API is preferred, we can align with consumer modules
and update it accordingly.
>> + struct xe_device *xe = handle;
>> + struct xe_sysctrl *sc = &xe->sc;
>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command *cmd = cmd_buffer;
>> + u8 *buffer = NULL;
>> + size_t command_size = 0;
>> + u8 group_id, command_code;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!xe || !cmd) {
>
> I suggest splitting the 2 checks here into separate if blocks and use
> pr_err or pr_debug if xe is NULL.
>
>> + if (xe)
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Invalid parameters\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!xe->info.has_sysctrl)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + group_id = XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_GROUP_ID(&cmd->header);
>> + command_code = XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_COMMAND(&cmd->header);
>
> Would be good to check if the group_id and command_id are valid here.
This function is intended to support multiple groups and commands, so we
avoid enforcing strict group_id and command_code checks here.
>> +
>> + if (!cmd->data_in && cmd->data_in_len) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Invalid input parameters\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!cmd->data_out && cmd->data_out_len) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Invalid output parameters\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + might_sleep();
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_prepare_command(sc, group_id, command_code,
>> + cmd->data_in, cmd->data_in_len,
>> + &buffer, &command_size);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Failed to prepare command: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
>> +
>> + guard(mutex)(&sc->cmd_lock);
>> +
>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_mailbox_send_command(sc, buffer, command_size,
>> + cmd->data_out, cmd->data_out_len, rdata_len,
>> + SC_MB_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> + if (ret)
>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Mailbox command failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> hmm, not sure this ordering is correct. Ideally you want mutex_unlock
> before runtime pm put, but the guard will only make sure unlock happens
> at function return. If using guard, you may want to define a similar
> guard for runtime pm. Maybe that's what Michal was suggesting earlier.
>
>> +
>> + kfree(buffer);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init - Initialize the system controller mailbox
>> state
>> + * @sysctrl: System controller structure
>> + */
>> +void xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init(struct xe_sysctrl *sc)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(sc, typeof(*xe), sc);
>> + u32 ctrl_reg;
>> +
>> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL);
>> + sc->phase_bit = (ctrl_reg & MKHI_FRAME_PHASE) ? 1 : 0;
>> +
>> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), SC_MB_CTRL, 0);
>
> You could use xe_mmio_rmw32() instead.
>
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h b/drivers/gpu/
>> drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6380d1d68f8f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __XE_SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_H__
>> +#define __XE_SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_H__
>> +
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +struct xe_sysctrl;
>> +
>> +#define MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +#define MKHI_HDR_COMMAND_MASK GENMASK(14, 8)
>> +#define MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE BIT(15)
>> +#define MKHI_HDR_RESERVED_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
>> +#define MKHI_HDR_RESULT_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>
> My interpretation was different from reading the spec. More like
> group_id is at bit[31:24] and result at bit[7:0]. Have you confirmed the
> above bitmask?
Yes, this bitmask works as expected in loopback testing.
Thanks,
Anoop
>
>> +
>> +struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr {
>> + __le32 data;
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> +#define APP_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +#define APP_HDR_COMMAND_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
>> +#define APP_HDR_VERSION_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
>> +#define APP_HDR_RESERVED_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>> +
>> +struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_app_msg_hdr {
>> + __le32 data;
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_GROUP_ID(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(APP_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_COMMAND(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(APP_HDR_COMMAND_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_VERSION(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(APP_HDR_VERSION_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_COMMAND(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(MKHI_HDR_COMMAND_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_MKHI_HDR_RESULT(hdr)
>> FIELD_GET(MKHI_HDR_RESULT_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command - System Controller mailbox
>> command structure
>> + */
>> +struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command {
>> + /** @header: Application message header containing command
>> information */
>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_app_msg_hdr header;
>
>> + /** @data_in: Pointer to input payload data (can be NULL if no
>> input data) */
>> + void *data_in;
>
>> + /** @data_in_len: Size of input payload in bytes (0 if no input
>> data) */
>> + size_t data_in_len;
>
>> + /** @data_out: Pointer to output buffer for response data (can be
>> NULL if no response) */
>> + void *data_out;
>
>> + /** @data_out_len: Size of output buffer in bytes (0 if no
>> response expected) */
>> + size_t data_out_len;
>
> Empty lines between members above will help readability.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +void xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init(struct xe_sysctrl *sc);
>> +int xe_sysctrl_send_command(void *handle, void *cmd_buffer, size_t
>> *rdata_len);
>> +
>> +#endif /* __XE_SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/
>> xe/xe_sysctrl_types.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..80e674cfa385
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_types.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _XE_SYSCTRL_TYPES_H_
>> +#define _XE_SYSCTRL_TYPES_H_
>> +
>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> Use only what's needed in this header. If you C file requires some of
> these headers, you want to move those to the C file.
>
> Regards,
> Umesh
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct xe_sysctrl - System Controller driver context
>> + */
>> +struct xe_sysctrl {
>> + /** @cmd_lock: Mutex protecting mailbox command operations */
>> + struct mutex cmd_lock;
>> +
>> + /** @phase_bit: MKHI message boundary phase toggle bit */
>> + u32 phase_bit;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* _XE_SYSCTRL_TYPES_H_ */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 15:17 [PATCH v1 0/1] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms Anoop, Vijay
2025-12-30 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] " Anoop, Vijay
2025-12-30 23:36 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-01-02 16:49 ` Anoop Vijay [this message]
2025-12-30 15:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-12-30 15:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-30 15:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-30 16:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23ded605-a085-42b3-bc71-af3178d07bc7@intel.com \
--to=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kam.nasim@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com \
--cc=paul.e.luse@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox