From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe/lnl: Enable GuC Wa_14019882105
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:56:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2636ee70-1b30-4f05-8448-3453d8f7e155@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29f52749-032e-469e-9cae-cad1f01896fd@intel.com>
On 3/25/2024 08:32, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On 25.03.2024 16:04, Badal Nilawar wrote:
>> Enable GuC Wa_14019882105 to block interrupts during C6 flow
>> when the memory path has been blocked
>>
>> v2: Make helper function generic and name it as
>> guc_waklv_enable_simple (John Harrison)
>> v3: Make warning descriptive (John Harrison)
>>
>> Cc: John Harrison <john.harrison@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h | 7 +++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
>> index 0400bc0fccdc..5dd45e06f0b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h
>> @@ -319,4 +319,11 @@ enum {
>> #define GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_BEGIN_CONTEXT_ID_KEY 0x8a0b
>> #define GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_BEGIN_CONTEXT_ID_LEN 1u
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Workaround keys:
>> + */
>> +enum xe_guc_klv_ids {
>> + GUC_WORKAROUND_KLV_BLOCK_INTERRUPTS_WHEN_MGSR_BLOCKED = 0x9002,
> how should we know the LEN of the particular W/A KLV ?
By reading the spec.
> as this is the ABI header, IMO we should define that here along the KEY
I strongly disagree with copying the entire GuC API spec into the source
code just for the sake of copying the spec. The implementation of this
w/a (and a whole bunch more that will follow) has no use for extra
defines about sizes or fields. And creating defines that will never be
used is a pointless exercise.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> index a98344a0ff4b..633e5fd9c738 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
>>
>> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>>
>> +#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
>> +
>> #include "regs/xe_engine_regs.h"
>> #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
>> #include "regs/xe_guc_regs.h"
>> @@ -19,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include "xe_map.h"
>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> #include "xe_platform_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_wa.h"
>>
>> /* Slack of a few additional entries per engine */
>> #define ADS_REGSET_EXTRA_MAX 8
>> @@ -279,23 +282,43 @@ static size_t calculate_golden_lrc_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> return total_size;
>> }
>>
>> +static void guc_waklv_enable_simple(struct xe_guc_ads *ads,
>> + enum xe_guc_klv_ids klv_id, u32 *offset, u32 *remain)
>> +{
>> + u32 size;
>> + u32 klv_entry[] = {
>> + /* 16:16 key/length */
> drop this comment, code is self explanatory
>
>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_KLV_0_KEY, klv_id) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_KLV_0_LEN, 0),
>> + /* 0 dwords data */
>> + };
> you can define size here:
>
> u32 size = sizeof(klv_entry);
>
>> +
>> + size = sizeof(klv_entry);
>> +
>> + if (*remain < size) {
>> + drm_warn(&ads_to_xe(ads)->drm,
>> + "w/a klv buffer too small to add klv id %d\n", klv_id);
> this looks like our programming error so xe_gt_assert() should be
> sufficient as we don't expect this ever happen in production
>
> but if you want to keep the WARN then use xe_gt_WARN() instead
>
>> + } else {
>> + xe_map_memcpy_to(ads_to_xe(ads), ads_to_map(ads), *offset,
>> + klv_entry, size);
>> + *offset += size;
>> + *remain -= size;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void guc_waklv_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>> {
>> + struct xe_gt *gt = ads_to_gt(ads);
>> u64 addr_ggtt;
>> u32 offset, remain, size;
>>
>> offset = guc_ads_waklv_offset(ads);
>> remain = guc_ads_waklv_size(ads);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Add workarounds here:
>> - *
>> - * if (want_wa_<name>) {
>> - * size = guc_waklv_<name>(guc, offset, remain);
>> - * offset += size;
>> - * remain -= size;
>> - * }
>> - */
>> + if (XE_WA(gt, 14019882105))
>> + guc_waklv_enable_simple(ads,
>> + GUC_WORKAROUND_KLV_BLOCK_INTERRUPTS_WHEN_MGSR_BLOCKED,
>> + &offset, &remain);
> hmm, it looks that your implementation here in patch 2/2 is different
> than suggested one in patch 1/2
It looks the same to me. It has simply optimised the the offset/remain
calculation to be done inside the helper rather than outside it to avoid
replication when all the other 'simple' w/a's are added. The actual
behaviour is identical.
John.
>
>>
>> size = guc_ads_waklv_size(ads) - remain;
>> if (!size)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> index 48cdba1cbf95..a8d15f004b6c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>> @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@
>> GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 1274)
>> MEDIA_VERSION(1300)
>> PLATFORM(DG2)
>> +14019882105 GRAPHICS_VERSION(2004), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 15:04 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for Wa KLVs Badal Nilawar
2024-03-25 14:56 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add support for Wa KLVs (rev3) Patchwork
2024-03-25 14:56 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-25 14:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Add support for w/a KLVs Badal Nilawar
2024-03-25 15:19 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-03-25 18:55 ` John Harrison
2024-03-26 11:06 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-03-27 4:49 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-03-27 20:47 ` John Harrison
2024-03-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe/lnl: Enable GuC Wa_14019882105 Badal Nilawar
2024-03-25 15:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-03-25 18:09 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-03-25 19:02 ` John Harrison
2024-03-25 18:56 ` John Harrison [this message]
2024-03-26 11:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-03-27 4:51 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-03-28 0:18 ` John Harrison
2024-03-25 15:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for Add support for Wa KLVs (rev3) Patchwork
2024-03-25 15:11 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-25 15:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-25 15:39 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2636ee70-1b30-4f05-8448-3453d8f7e155@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox