From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Convert xe_pm_runtime_{get, put} to void and protect from recursion
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:48:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <275c17ef-3f72-48a8-8006-d6a564ef8f4c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301180526.643505-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On 01/03/2024 18:05, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> With mem_access going away and pm_runtime getting called instead,
> we need to protect these against recursions.
>
> The put is asynchronous so there's no need to block it. However, for a
> proper balance, we need to ensure that the references are taken and
> restored regardless of the flow. So, let's convert them all to void and
> use some direct linux/pm_runtime functions.
>
> v2: Rebased and update commit message (Matt).
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> #v1
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Sorry missed this, r-b still applies to v2.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 3e13a666fcc7..9fbb6f6c598a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -408,26 +408,29 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> /**
> * xe_pm_runtime_get - Get a runtime_pm reference and resume synchronously
> * @xe: xe device instance
> - *
> - * Returns: Any number greater than or equal to 0 for success, negative error
> - * code otherwise.
> */
> -int xe_pm_runtime_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> +void xe_pm_runtime_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - return pm_runtime_get_sync(xe->drm.dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe->drm.dev);
> +
> + if (xe_pm_read_callback_task(xe) == current)
> + return;
> +
> + pm_runtime_resume(xe->drm.dev);
> }
>
> /**
> * xe_pm_runtime_put - Put the runtime_pm reference back and mark as idle
> * @xe: xe device instance
> - *
> - * Returns: Any number greater than or equal to 0 for success, negative error
> - * code otherwise.
> */
> -int xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe)
> +void xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(xe->drm.dev);
> - return pm_runtime_put(xe->drm.dev);
> + if (xe_pm_read_callback_task(xe) == current) {
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(xe->drm.dev);
> + } else {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(xe->drm.dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(xe->drm.dev);
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> index 29c20099a3f9..0cb38ca244fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ void xe_pm_runtime_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
> bool xe_pm_runtime_suspended(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_pm_runtime_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_pm_runtime_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(struct xe_device *xe);
> bool xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct xe_device *xe);
> bool xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get(struct xe_device *xe);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 18:05 [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Fix display runtime_pm handling Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-01 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Create a xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get variant for display Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-01 18:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Convert xe_pm_runtime_{get, put} to void and protect from recursion Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-04 16:48 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-03-01 18:10 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Fix display runtime_pm handling Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:11 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:23 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:24 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-01 18:44 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=275c17ef-3f72-48a8-8006-d6a564ef8f4c@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox