From: "Randhawa, Jagmeet" <jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip schedule disable for an already reset exec queue
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a7e8701-f03d-4ce6-b2fa-8b77c57d844b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqxJHcGb0Krg2ccC@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com>
On 9/17/2026 1:10 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 03:38:39AM +0800, Jagmeet Randhawa wrote:
>> A memory CAT error causes GuC to reset the offending context and notify
>> the driver. xe_guc_exec_queue_memory_cat_error_handler() treats this the
>> same as an engine reset and calls xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_trigger_cleanup(),
>> which sets EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_RESET.
>>
>> Roughly 200us later the TDR runs for the same queue. It reads
>> exec_queue_reset(), uses the result only to set err = -EIO, and then sends
>> a schedule disable (H2G SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET) anyway. GuC has already
>> destroyed the context, so no SCHED_DONE is ever returned. The TDR then
>> waits out its HZ*5 timeout, reports "Schedule disable failed to respond"
>> and calls xe_gt_reset_async(), escalating a per-context failure into a
>> full GT reset that kills every context on the tile and reloads GuC.
>>
> There is a mode where a CAT error or GuC queue reset disables scheduling
> or tears down the context, but we do not enable that mode.
>
> I see there is a multi-queue related issue mentioned below, and it is
> certainly possible that we have a bug there. However, I'm fairly
> confident that this patch will break non-multi-queue flows.
>
> On my BMG system running drm-tip:
>
> On my BMG + drm-tip:
>
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xe
> for f in xe_exec_queue*/enable; do
> echo 1 > "$f"
> done
> cd -
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xe
> for f in xe_sched_job_*/enable; do
> echo 1 > "$f"
> done
> cd -
>
> root@DUT6235BMGFRD:mbrost# xe_exec_reset --r cat-error
> IGT-Version: 2.5-gaccf33cc6 (x86_64) (Linux: 7.3.0-rc3-xe+ x86_64)
> Using IGT_SRANDOM=1789675008 for randomisation
> Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
> Starting subtest: cat-error
> Subtest cat-error: SUCCESS (0.027s)
>
> The in ftrace:
>
> 38 kworker/u64:2-130 [012] ..... 265.216703: xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error: dev=0000:03:00.0, 0:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x0
> 39 kworker/u64:2-130 [012] ..... 265.217326: xe_exec_queue_scheduling_disable: dev=0000:03:00.0, 0:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x249, flags=0x0
> 40 kworker/u64:6-154 [011] ..... 265.218858: xe_sched_job_free: dev=0000:03:00.0, fence=00000000ba06a299, seqno=4294967169, lrc_seqno=4294967169, gt=0, guc_id=3, batch_addr=0x0 000001a04a0, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x0, error=0
> 41 kworker/u64:4-134 [000] ..... 265.219506: xe_exec_queue_reset: dev=0000:03:00.0, 0:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x249, flags=0x0
> 42 kworker/u64:4-134 [000] ..... 265.219507: xe_exec_queue_scheduling_done: dev=0000:03:00.0, 0:0x1, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x249, flags=0x0
> 43 kworker/u64:2-130 [012] ..... 265.219518: xe_sched_job_timedout: dev=0000:03:00.0, fence=00000000f8118031, seqno=4294967169, lrc_seqno=4294967169, gt=0, guc_id=2, batch_addr =0x0000002a0000, guc_state=0x241, flags=0x0, error=0
> 44 kworker/u64:2-130 [012] ..... 265.242149: xe_sched_job_set_error: dev=0000:03:00.0, fence=00000000f8118031, seqno=4294967169, lrc_seqno=4294967169, gt=0, guc_id=2, batch_add r=0x0000002a0000, guc_state=0x241, flags=0x0, error=-5
> 45 kworker/u64:2-130 [012] ..... 265.242154: xe_sched_job_free: dev=0000:03:00.0, fence=00000000f8118031, seqno=4294967169, lrc_seqno=4294967169, gt=0, guc_id=2, batch_addr=0x0 000002a0000, guc_state=0x241, flags=0x0, error=-5
>
> Lines 39, 43, 44, 45 are the TDR.
> Lines 38, 41, 42 are the G2H handlers.
>
> It isn't safe to signal a job's fences until scheduling has been
> disabled, as that is the point at which we know the queue is no longer
> accessing memory. A job's fence is what prevents the associated memory
> from being moved while the job may still be touching it.
>
> After you change, the above test takes ~4 to complete too.
>
> Please rethink this patch.
>
> Matt
Thanks for the detailed review and for the BMG trace, let me revisit
the logic. Please ignore this patch for now.
Thanks,
Jagmeet
>
>> The failure is intermittent because the enclosing guard is
>> (exec_queue_enabled || exec_queue_pending_disable): it is a race between
>> the CAT error cleanup and the TDR. When cleanup wins the block is skipped
>> and recovery is clean; when the TDR wins the disable is sent and the
>> timeout fires.
>>
>> Skip the handshake entirely when the context has already been reset. The
>> send, the HZ*5 wait and the GT reset escalation all live in the same block,
>> so a single condition removes all three. err = -EIO is preserved so
>> userspace still receives the correct error, and execution falls through to
>> the normal cleanup path, which performs the deregistration.
>>
>> This matches existing behaviour elsewhere in the driver:
>> xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_handler() calls the same
>> xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_trigger_cleanup() and performs no disable
>> handshake at all. The TDR path was simply inconsistent with it.
>>
>> Evidence, captured with existing ftrace events only (no instrumentation):
>>
>> Healthy acknowledgements take ~350us:
>> 4806.244755 xe_exec_queue_scheduling_enable guc_id=2 guc_state=0x7
>> 4806.245126 xe_exec_queue_scheduling_done guc_id=2 guc_state=0x7
>>
>> The failure:
>> 4806.245395 xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error guc_id=2 guc_state=0x3
>> 4806.245592 xe_exec_queue_scheduling_disable guc_id=2 guc_state=0x249
>> <5.18s, no scheduling_done for any guc_id>
>> 4811.425872 xe_sched_job_timedout guc_id=2 guc_state=0x200
>>
>> guc_state=0x249 is REGISTERED|PENDING_DISABLE|RESET|BANNED. The RESET bit
>> confirms the exec_queue_reset() branch was taken and the disable was sent
>> regardless. scheduling_done never fires, so handle_sched_done() never runs
>> and the acknowledgement genuinely never arrives.
>>
>> With the fix, scheduling_disable is traced at guc_state=0x2d9
>> (adds DESTROYED|KILLED), i.e. it now originates from
>> disable_scheduling_deregister() on the normal cleanup path, and GuC
>> acknowledges it every time.
>>
>> Testing:
>> igt@xe_exec_reset@multi-queue-cancel 0/10 failures
>> (baseline 10/10 failures)
>> igt@xe_exec_reset@multi-queue-cancel-on-secondary passing
>> Subtest runtime drops from ~5.2s to ~85ms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagmeet Randhawa <jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> index f3ba8abfc228..03450590042a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> @@ -1609,14 +1609,20 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
>> atomic_or(DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_BAN_REASON_GPU_HANG, &q->ban_reason);
>> set_exec_queue_banned(q);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * GuC already reset this context (the CAT error handler treats a CAT
>> + * error as an engine reset), so there is nothing left to disable and
>> + * SCHED_DONE will never arrive. Skip the handshake rather than waiting
>> + * HZ*5 and escalating to a full GT reset.
>> + */
>> + if (exec_queue_reset(primary))
>> + err = -EIO;
>> +
>> /* Kick job / queue off hardware */
>> - if (!xe_device_is_in_reset(xe) && !wedged &&
>> + if (!xe_device_is_in_reset(xe) && !wedged && !exec_queue_reset(primary) &&
>> (exec_queue_enabled(primary) || exec_queue_pending_disable(primary))) {
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (exec_queue_reset(primary))
>> - err = -EIO;
>> -
>> if (xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw)) {
>> /*
>> * Wait for any pending G2H to flush out before
>> --
>> 2.53.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 19:38 [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip schedule disable for an already reset exec queue Jagmeet Randhawa
2026-09-17 20:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-18 18:31 ` Randhawa, Jagmeet [this message]
2026-09-17 21:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-09-17 21:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-17 22:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-18 2:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a7e8701-f03d-4ce6-b2fa-8b77c57d844b@intel.com \
--to=jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox