From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tejas.upadhyay@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] drm/xe/guc: Hold device ref until queue teardown completes
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:34:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a946288e9c348473a8c81b8ab56fb1e5ababe6c.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710030107.1813068-1-arvind.yadav@intel.com>
On Fri, 2026-07-10 at 08:31 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> GuC exec queue destruction can run asynchronously. If the final
> device
> put happens from a destroy worker, drmm cleanup can end up draining
> the same workqueue and deadlock.
>
> Hold a drm_device reference for the queue lifetime and drop it after
> queue teardown completes. This keeps drmm cleanup from running while
> async destroy work is still pending.
>
> Move GuC destroy work to a module-lifetime Xe workqueue and flush it
> on PCI remove so hot-unbind/rebind still waits for pending destroy
> work.
>
> With queue-held device refs, guc_submit_sw_fini() cannot run with
> live
> GuC IDs. Replace the fini wait with an assertion and remove the
> unused
> fini_wq.
>
> v2:
> - Rebase
>
> v3:
> - Switch to queue-lifetime drm_dev_get()/drm_dev_put() model.
> (Matt)
> - Queue async teardown on system_dfl_wq instead of xe->destroy_wq.
> (Matt)
> - Drop separate deferred drm_dev_put worker.
> - Remove stale drain_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq) from
> guc_submit_sw_fini().
>
> v4:
> - Replace the guc_submit_sw_fini() wait with an assertion and
> remove
> the now-unused fini_wq. (sashiko)
>
> v5:
> - Move destroy work to a module-lifetime Xe workqueue instead of
> system_dfl_wq. (Matt)
> - Flush the module-lifetime destroy workqueue during PCI remove to
> preserve the old device-remove wait semantics.
>
> v6:
> - Keep SVM pagemap destroy work on the per-device destroy_wq to
> avoid
> letting it outlive the xe_device/drm_device. (Sashiko)
> - Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for xe->destroy_wq because SVM pagemap destroy
> work
> can be queued from the reclaim path.
>
> v7:
> - Drop the per-device xe->destroy_wq and use the module-level
> destroy WQ
> for SVM pagemap destroy as well. (Matt)
> - Rename xe_exec_queue_destroy_wq_*() helpers to xe_destroy_wq_*()
> helpers because the WQ is no longer exec-queue specific. (Matt)
>
> v8:
> - Rebase.
>
> v9:
> - Keep SVM pagemap destroy work on the per-device WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> destroy_wq because it can be queued from reclaim and embeds
> the dev_pagemap used by devres teardown. (Sashiko)
> - Keep the module-level destroy WQ GuC-only and drop WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> from it.
> - Update the module-WQ kdoc to document the GuC/SVM split.
>
> v10:
> - Keep xe->destroy_wq per-cpu while adding WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to fix
> the
> workqueue allocation warning.
If *all* work items that release the drm_device refcount are flushed at
device removal (unplug) time, Why do we need the drm_device reference
in the first place? Since IIRC the devres, that runs after unplug,
keeps a drm_device reference?
Similarly, if we flush all outstanding per-device GuC work at device
removal time, why do we need this additional module-wide workqueue?
Wouldn't it be equivalent to keep the GuC work items on the per-device
destroy wq, and flush it at unplug / pci removal, the latter being the
key?
>
> Fixes: 2d2be279f1ca ("drm/xe: fix UAF around queue destruction")
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++----------
> --
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h | 5 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 6 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 5 +++
> 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index ad7f3e61d457..47630e9f7410 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ int xe_device_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
> xe->ordered_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-ordered-wq",
> 0);
> xe->unordered_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-unordered-wq",
> WQ_PERCPU, 0);
> - xe->destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-destroy-wq", WQ_PERCPU,
> 0);
> + xe->destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-destroy-wq", WQ_PERCPU
> | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> if (!xe->ordered_wq || !xe->unordered_wq ||
> !xe->preempt_fence_wq || !xe->destroy_wq) {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 022e08205897..56c17cca79c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ struct xe_device {
> /** @unordered_wq: used to serialize unordered work */
> struct workqueue_struct *unordered_wq;
>
> - /** @destroy_wq: used to serialize user destroy work, like
> queue */
> + /** @destroy_wq: used to serialize SVM pagemap destroy work
> */
> struct workqueue_struct *destroy_wq;
>
> /** @tiles: device tiles */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 12416bfa3255..9b9434d7452a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
> #include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
>
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>
> #include "abi/guc_actions_abi.h"
> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@
> #include "xe_macros.h"
> #include "xe_map.h"
> #include "xe_mocs.h"
> +#include "xe_module.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
> #include "xe_ring_ops_types.h"
> #include "xe_sched_job.h"
> @@ -232,17 +234,9 @@ static bool
> exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> static void guc_submit_sw_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> {
> struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> - struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->submission_state.fini_wq,
> - xa_empty(&guc-
> >submission_state.exec_queue_lookup),
> - HZ * 5);
>
> - drain_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq);
> -
> - xe_gt_assert(gt, ret);
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, xa_empty(&guc-
> >submission_state.exec_queue_lookup));
>
> xa_destroy(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup);
> }
> @@ -319,8 +313,6 @@ int xe_guc_submit_init(struct xe_guc *guc,
> unsigned int num_ids)
>
> xa_init(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup);
>
> - init_waitqueue_head(&guc->submission_state.fini_wq);
> -
> primelockdep(guc);
>
> guc->submission_state.initialized = true;
> @@ -411,9 +403,6 @@ static void __release_guc_id(struct xe_guc *guc,
> struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> xe_guc_id_mgr_release_locked(&guc->submission_state.idm,
> q->guc->id, q->width);
>
> - if (xa_empty(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup))
> - wake_up(&guc->submission_state.fini_wq);
> -
> mutex_unlock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> }
>
> @@ -1686,6 +1675,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_fini(struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> {
> struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge = q->guc;
> struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> + struct drm_device *drm = &guc_to_xe(guc)->drm;
>
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue_secondary(q)) {
> struct xe_exec_queue_group *group = q-
> >multi_queue.group;
> @@ -1704,36 +1694,52 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_fini(struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> * (timeline name).
> */
> kfree_rcu(ge, rcu);
> +
> + drm_dev_put(drm);
> }
>
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct work_struct *w)
> +static void guc_exec_queue_do_destroy(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> {
> - struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge =
> - container_of(w, struct xe_guc_exec_queue,
> destroy_async);
> - struct xe_exec_queue *q = ge->q;
> + struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge = q->guc;
> struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + struct drm_device *drm = &xe->drm;
>
> - guard(xe_pm_runtime)(guc_to_xe(guc));
> - trace_xe_exec_queue_destroy(q);
> + /*
> + * guc_exec_queue_fini() drops the queue's drm_device ref.
> + * Keep the device alive until the PM-runtime guard unwinds.
> + */
> + drm_dev_get(drm);
>
> - /* Confirm no work left behind accessing device structures
> */
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ge->sched.base.work_tdr);
> + scoped_guard(xe_pm_runtime, xe) {
> + trace_xe_exec_queue_destroy(q);
>
> - xe_exec_queue_fini(q);
> + /* Confirm no work left behind accessing device
> structures */
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ge->sched.base.work_tdr);
> +
> + xe_exec_queue_fini(q);
> + }
> +
> + drm_dev_put(drm);
> }
>
> -static void guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct work_struct *w)
> {
> - struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> - struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge =
> + container_of(w, struct xe_guc_exec_queue,
> destroy_async);
> +
> + guc_exec_queue_do_destroy(ge->q);
> +}
>
> +static void guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +{
> INIT_WORK(&q->guc->destroy_async,
> __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async);
>
> /* We must block on kernel engines so slabs are empty on
> driver unload */
> if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT ||
> exec_queue_wedged(q))
> - __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(&q->guc-
> >destroy_async);
> + guc_exec_queue_do_destroy(q);
> else
> - queue_work(xe->destroy_wq, &q->guc->destroy_async);
> + xe_destroy_wq_queue(&q->guc->destroy_async);
> }
>
> static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_guc *guc, struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> @@ -1928,6 +1934,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> {
> struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched;
> struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> + struct drm_device *drm = &guc_to_xe(guc)->drm;
> struct workqueue_struct *submit_wq = NULL;
> struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge;
> long timeout;
> @@ -1939,6 +1946,8 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> if (!ge)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + drm_dev_get(drm);
> +
> q->guc = ge;
> ge->q = q;
> init_rcu_head(&ge->rcu);
> @@ -2015,6 +2024,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct
> xe_exec_queue *q)
> release_guc_id(guc, q);
> err_free:
> kfree(ge);
> + drm_dev_put(drm);
>
> return err;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> index c7b9642b41ba..31a2acb63ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_types.h
> @@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ struct xe_guc {
> * even initialized - before that not even the lock
> is valid
> */
> bool initialized;
> - /** @submission_state.fini_wq: submit fini wait
> queue */
> - wait_queue_head_t fini_wq;
> } submission_state;
>
> /** @hwconfig: Hardware config state */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> index 39e4fc85f019..848d65265443 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_module.h>
>
> @@ -88,6 +89,50 @@ static int xe_check_nomodeset(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct workqueue_struct *xe_destroy_wq;
> +
> +static int __init xe_destroy_wq_module_init(void)
> +{
> + xe_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-guc-destroy-wq",
> WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
> + if (!xe_destroy_wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_destroy_wq_module_exit(void)
> +{
> + if (xe_destroy_wq)
> + destroy_workqueue(xe_destroy_wq);
> + xe_destroy_wq = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_destroy_wq_queue() - Queue work on the destroy workqueue
> + * @work: work item to queue
> + *
> + * The destroy workqueue has module lifetime and is used for GuC
> exec queue
> + * teardown that can outlive a single xe_device. SVM pagemap destroy
> uses the
> + * per-device xe->destroy_wq instead.
> + *
> + * Return: %true if @work was queued, %false if it was already
> pending.
> + */
> +bool xe_destroy_wq_queue(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + return queue_work(xe_destroy_wq, work);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_destroy_wq_flush() - Flush the destroy workqueue
> + *
> + * Drains all pending destroy work. Called from PCI remove to ensure
> + * teardown ordering before the device is destroyed.
> + */
> +void xe_destroy_wq_flush(void)
> +{
> + if (xe_destroy_wq)
> + flush_workqueue(xe_destroy_wq);
> +}
> +
> struct init_funcs {
> int (*init)(void);
> void (*exit)(void);
> @@ -109,6 +154,10 @@ static const struct init_funcs init_funcs[] = {
> .init = xe_sched_job_module_init,
> .exit = xe_sched_job_module_exit,
> },
> + {
> + .init = xe_destroy_wq_module_init,
> + .exit = xe_destroy_wq_module_exit,
> + },
> {
> .init = xe_register_pci_driver,
> .exit = xe_unregister_pci_driver,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> index c75153471248..a0eb7db07770 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +struct work_struct;
> +
> /* Module modprobe variables */
> struct xe_modparam {
> bool probe_display;
> @@ -26,5 +28,8 @@ struct xe_modparam {
>
> extern struct xe_modparam xe_modparam;
>
> +bool xe_destroy_wq_queue(struct work_struct *work);
> +void xe_destroy_wq_flush(void);
> +
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 08c14a0202d9..b0764eb90834 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -1099,6 +1099,12 @@ static void xe_pci_remove(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> return;
>
> xe_device_remove(xe);
> +
> + /*
> + * Preserve remove-time flush after moving destroy work to
> module
> + * lifetime.
> + */
> + xe_destroy_wq_flush();
> xe_pm_fini(xe);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index e0f0c23d172d..2cb17497d950 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -1732,6 +1732,11 @@ static void xe_pagemap_destroy(struct
> drm_pagemap *dpagemap, bool from_atomic_or
> struct xe_pagemap *xpagemap = container_of(dpagemap,
> typeof(*xpagemap), dpagemap);
> struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dpagemap->drm);
>
> + /*
> + * SVM pagemap destroy can be queued from reclaim and
> xpagemap embeds
> + * the dev_pagemap used by devres teardown. Keep it on the
> per-device
> + * WQ_MEM_RECLAIM destroy_wq, not the module-level GuC
> destroy WQ.
> + */
I think this comment can be dropped. Outside the context of this patch
it will be confusing?
> if (from_atomic_or_reclaim)
> queue_work(xe->destroy_wq, &xpagemap->destroy_work);
> else
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 3:01 [PATCH v10] drm/xe/guc: Hold device ref until queue teardown completes Arvind Yadav
2026-07-10 3:08 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Hold device ref until queue teardown completes (rev8) Patchwork
2026-07-10 4:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-10 6:34 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2026-07-10 10:00 ` [PATCH v10] drm/xe/guc: Hold device ref until queue teardown completes Yadav, Arvind
2026-07-10 12:57 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-07-10 11:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for drm/xe/guc: Hold device ref until queue teardown completes (rev8) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a946288e9c348473a8c81b8ab56fb1e5ababe6c.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox