From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: use IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() on config options
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:40:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c32a188-0084-4a77-8347-aa2754884ff8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904145231.3902289-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>
On 04-09-2024 20:22, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Prefer IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() for checking whether a kconfig
> option is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Regards,
Badal
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index 06911e9a3bf5..53948a965404 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int xe_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> mem->bus.offset += vram->io_start;
> mem->bus.is_iomem = true;
>
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_X86)
> +#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> mem->bus.caching = ttm_write_combined;
> #endif
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.c
> index f3ddcbefc6bc..2ed5b6780d30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list vf_info[] = {
> .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show,
> .data = xe_gt_sriov_vf_print_version,
> },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_SRIOV)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_SRIOV)
> {
> "runtime_regs",
> .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 52df28032a6f..db667850c8b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static s32 guc_pc_get_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *guc_pc)
> * extreme thermal throttling. And a system that is that hot during boot is probably
> * dead anyway!
> */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
> #define GUC_LOAD_RETRY_LIMIT 20
> #else
> #define GUC_LOAD_RETRY_LIMIT 3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 14:52 [PATCH] drm/xe: use IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() on config options Jani Nikula
2024-09-04 15:23 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:23 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:36 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:40 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-04 15:54 ` [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-09-06 13:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-04 16:24 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:29 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: use IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() on config options (rev2) Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:29 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:47 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 9:49 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 10:17 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 13:10 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-09-06 12:43 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe: use IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() on config options Patchwork
2024-09-07 8:26 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe: use IS_ENABLED() instead of defined() on config options (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c32a188-0084-4a77-8347-aa2754884ff8@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox