From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: fix vecs config for powergating info
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:29:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32cd50ec-22fb-49b8-8206-6c370d86caf0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818050041.448014-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On 18-08-2026 10:30, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> vecs configuration for newer platforms (media version >= 35) is
> different. Fix powergating info for these platforms.
>
> Bspec: 67103, 77977
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Restrict to two media slices (Badal Nilawar)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
> index 04b24e1c8b78e..98bd4d87ba184 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
> @@ -208,26 +208,34 @@ int xe_gt_idle_pg_print(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> /*
> * Media Slices
> *
> - * Slice 0: VCS0, VCS1, VECS0
> - * Slice 1: VCS2, VCS3, VECS1
> - * Slice 2: VCS4, VCS5, VECS2
> - * Slice 3: VCS6, VCS7, VECS3
> + * Prior to MEDIA_VER 35 Post MEDIA_VER 35
> + *
> + * Slice 0: VCS0, VCS1, VECS0, VECS2 Slice 0: VCS0, VCS1, VECS0, VECS1
> + * Slice 1: VCS2, VCS3, VECS1, VECS3 Slice 1: VCS2, VCS3, VECS2, VECS3
> */
> - static const struct {
> + struct media_slice {
> u64 engines;
> u32 status_bit;
> - } media_slices[] = {
> + };
> +
> + static const struct media_slice media_slices_pre_35[] = {
> {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS1) |
> - BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0)), MEDIA_SLICE0_AWAKE_STATUS},
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS2)),
> + MEDIA_SLICE0_AWAKE_STATUS},
>
> {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS2) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS3) |
> - BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS1)), MEDIA_SLICE1_AWAKE_STATUS},
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS1) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3)),
> + MEDIA_SLICE1_AWAKE_STATUS},
> + };
>
> - {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS4) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS5) |
> - BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS2)), MEDIA_SLICE2_AWAKE_STATUS},
> + static const struct media_slice media_slices_post_35[] = {
> + {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS1) |
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS1)),
> + MEDIA_SLICE0_AWAKE_STATUS},
>
> - {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS6) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS7) |
> - BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3)), MEDIA_SLICE3_AWAKE_STATUS},
> + {(BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS2) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS3) |
> + BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS2) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3)),
> + MEDIA_SLICE1_AWAKE_STATUS},
> };
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Thanks,
Badal
>
> if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> @@ -261,10 +269,21 @@ int xe_gt_idle_pg_print(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>
> /* Print media CPG status only if media is present */
> if (vcs_mask || vecs_mask) {
> + const struct media_slice *media_slices;
> + int num_media_slices;
> +
> + if (MEDIA_VERx100(gt_to_xe(gt)) < 3500) {
> + media_slices = media_slices_pre_35;
> + num_media_slices = ARRAY_SIZE(media_slices_pre_35);
> + } else {
> + media_slices = media_slices_post_35;
> + num_media_slices = ARRAY_SIZE(media_slices_post_35);
> + }
> +
> drm_printf(p, "Media Power Gating Enabled: %s\n",
> str_yes_no(pg_enabled & MEDIA_POWERGATE_ENABLE));
>
> - for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(media_slices); n++)
> + for (n = 0; n < num_media_slices; n++)
> if (gt->info.engine_mask & media_slices[n].engines)
> drm_printf(p, "Media Slice%d Power Gate Status: %s\n", n,
> str_up_down(pg_status & media_slices[n].status_bit));
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 5:00 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: fix vecs config for powergating info Ashutosh Dixit
2026-08-18 5:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: fix vecs config for powergating info (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-18 6:01 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-18 7:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-21 3:59 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32cd50ec-22fb-49b8-8206-6c370d86caf0@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox