From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract platform-specific parameters
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 19:49:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3427613dfaf60b4fd322d58221dd78043e30caff@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cxywptnb.fsf@intel.com>
On Fri, 15 May 2026, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> wrote:
> Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> writes:
>
>> We got confirmation from the hardware team that the bandwidth parameters
>> deprogbwlimit and derating are platform-specific and not tied to the
>> display IP. As such, let's make sure that we use platform checks for
>> those.
>>
>> The rest of the members of struct intel_sa_info are tied to the display
>> IP and we will deal with them as a follow-up.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Use good old if-ladder instead of weird-looking pattern "assign ret,
>> check platform, then return ret". (Jani, Matt)
>> - Have a single call site for get_platform_bw_params() and pass the
>> result as parameter to the *_get_bw_info() functions. (Jani)
>> - Avoid using "plat" as abbreviation for "platform". (Jani)
>> - s/_plat_bw_params/_bw_params/, since all of the instances are
>> prefixed with platform names. (Jani)
>> - s/struct intel_platform_bw_params/struct intel_soc_bw_params/.
>> (Matt)
>> - Do not return a default value; prefer to return NULL and
>> intentionally cause a NULL pointer dereference if a platform is
>> missing. (Gustavo)
>>
>> v3:
>> - Call get_soc_bw_params() only after the check on
>> HAS_DISPLAY(display). (Jani)
>> - Combine if-ladder branches for adl_s_bw_params into a single one.
>> (Matt)
>> - Flatten if-ladder by checking for WCL before PTL (as opposed to
>> checking for WCL inside the brace for PTL). (Matt)
>> - Bail out of intel_bw_init_hw() if display version is below 11.
>> (Gustavo)
>>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>> index 7eef693b51ad..351ecf741b54 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>> @@ -372,81 +372,144 @@ static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(const struct intel_qgv_info *qi)
>> return dclk;
>> }
>>
>> +struct intel_soc_bw_params {
>> + u8 deprogbwlimit;
>> + u8 derating;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params icl_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 25,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params tgl_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 34,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params rkl_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 20,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params adl_s_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 38,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params adl_p_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 38,
>> + .derating = 20,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params bmg_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 53,
>> + .derating = 30,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params bmg_ecc_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 53,
>> + .derating = 45,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params ptl_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 65,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params wcl_bw_params = {
>> + .deprogbwlimit = 22,
>> + .derating = 10,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_soc_bw_params *get_soc_bw_params(struct intel_display *display)
>> +{
>> + if (display->platform.dgfx) {
>> + if (display->platform.dg1) {
>> + return &tgl_bw_params;
>> + } else if (display->platform.battlemage) {
>> + const struct dram_info *dram_info = intel_dram_info(display);
>> +
>> + if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC)
>> + return &bmg_ecc_bw_params;
>> + else
>> + return &bmg_bw_params;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (display->platform.icelake ||
>> + display->platform.jasperlake ||
>> + display->platform.elkhartlake)
>> + return &icl_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.tigerlake)
>> + return &tgl_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.rocketlake)
>> + return &rkl_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.alderlake_s ||
>> + display->platform.meteorlake ||
>> + display->platform.lunarlake)
>> + return &adl_s_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.alderlake_p)
>> + return &adl_p_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.pantherlake_wildcatlake)
>> + return &wcl_bw_params;
>> + else if (display->platform.pantherlake ||
>> + display->platform.novalake)
>> + return &ptl_bw_params;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_WARN(display->drm, 1, "Platform-specific bandwidth parameters not found!\n");
>
> CI shows the warning because DG2 does not use bandwidth
> parameters and get_soc_bw_params() rightfully does not cover DG2.
>
> We could just get rid of the warnings in get_soc_bw_params() and
> get_display_bw_params() all together. The idea of the warning was to
> serve as an aid to the developer, but I guess tracing the null pointer
> dereference back to those functions shouldn't be too hard?
>
> Another idea is to make sure that only the functions that use those
> parameters make the call to get_{soc,display}_bw_params().
>
> Jani, I know you preferred the other way around, but maybe this is a
> compelling reason for moving the call to the direct users?
I still prefer figuring the pointer out early, and passing it around to
the places that need it. Actually, ditto for dram_info above. I
refactored this stuff once to call intel_dram_info() once, and pass the
pointer around.
I think the alternatives are:
- Remove the drm_WARN() altogether.
- Return NULL directly for platforms where the parameters don't make
sense, e.g. DG2.
BR,
Jani.
>
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
>
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> struct intel_sa_info {
>> u16 displayrtids;
>> - u8 deburst, deprogbwlimit, derating;
>> + u8 deburst;
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info icl_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 8,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 25, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 128,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info tgl_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 16,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 34, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info rkl_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 8,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 20, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 128,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info adls_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 16,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 38, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info adlp_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 16,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 38, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 20,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info mtl_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 32,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 38, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> -};
>> -
>> -static const struct intel_sa_info xe2_hpd_sa_info = {
>> - .derating = 30,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 53,
>> - /* Other values not used by simplified algorithm */
>> -};
>> -
>> -static const struct intel_sa_info xe2_hpd_ecc_sa_info = {
>> - .derating = 45,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 53,
>> - /* Other values not used by simplified algorithm */
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info xe3lpd_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 32,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 65, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct intel_sa_info xe3lpd_3002_sa_info = {
>> .deburst = 32,
>> - .deprogbwlimit = 22, /* GB/s */
>> .displayrtids = 256,
>> - .derating = 10,
>> };
>>
>> static int icl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> const struct dram_info *dram_info,
>> + const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params,
>> const struct intel_sa_info *sa)
>> {
>> struct intel_qgv_info qi = {};
>> @@ -466,7 +529,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> }
>>
>> dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi);
>> - maxdebw = min(sa->deprogbwlimit * 1000, dclk_max * 16 * 6 / 10);
>> + maxdebw = min(soc_bw_params->deprogbwlimit * 1000, dclk_max * 16 * 6 / 10);
>> ipqdepth = min(ipqdepthpch, sa->displayrtids / num_channels);
>> qi.deinterleave = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_channels, is_y_tile ? 4 : 2);
>>
>> @@ -496,7 +559,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels, ct);
>>
>> bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
>> - bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
>> + bw * (100 - soc_bw_params->derating) / 100);
>>
>> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
>> "BW%d / QGV %d: num_planes=%d deratedbw=%u\n",
>> @@ -518,6 +581,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>>
>> static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> const struct dram_info *dram_info,
>> + const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params,
>> const struct intel_sa_info *sa)
>> {
>> struct intel_qgv_info qi = {};
>> @@ -554,7 +618,7 @@ static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi);
>>
>> peakbw = num_channels * DIV_ROUND_UP(qi.channel_width, 8) * dclk_max;
>> - maxdebw = min(sa->deprogbwlimit * 1000, peakbw * DEPROGBWPCLIMIT / 100);
>> + maxdebw = min(soc_bw_params->deprogbwlimit * 1000, peakbw * DEPROGBWPCLIMIT / 100);
>>
>> ipqdepth = min(ipqdepthpch, sa->displayrtids / num_channels);
>> /*
>> @@ -599,7 +663,7 @@ static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels, ct);
>>
>> bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
>> - bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
>> + bw * (100 - soc_bw_params->derating) / 100);
>> bi->peakbw[j] = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(sp->dclk *
>> num_channels *
>> qi.channel_width, 8);
>> @@ -661,7 +725,7 @@ static void dg2_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display)
>>
>> static int xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> const struct dram_info *dram_info,
>> - const struct intel_sa_info *sa)
>> + const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params)
>> {
>> struct intel_qgv_info qi = {};
>> int num_channels = dram_info->num_channels;
>> @@ -676,14 +740,14 @@ static int xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(struct intel_display *display,
>> }
>>
>> peakbw = num_channels * qi.channel_width / 8 * icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi);
>> - maxdebw = min(sa->deprogbwlimit * 1000, peakbw * DEPROGBWPCLIMIT / 10);
>> + maxdebw = min(soc_bw_params->deprogbwlimit * 1000, peakbw * DEPROGBWPCLIMIT / 10);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < qi.num_points; i++) {
>> const struct intel_qgv_point *point = &qi.points[i];
>> int bw = num_channels * (qi.channel_width / 8) * point->dclk;
>>
>> display->bw.max[0].deratedbw[i] =
>> - min(maxdebw, (100 - sa->derating) * bw / 100);
>> + min(maxdebw, (100 - soc_bw_params->derating) * bw / 100);
>> display->bw.max[0].peakbw[i] = bw;
>>
>> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "QGV %d: deratedbw=%u peakbw: %u\n",
>> @@ -792,11 +856,16 @@ static unsigned int icl_qgv_bw(struct intel_display *display,
>> void intel_bw_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
>> {
>> const struct dram_info *dram_info;
>> + const struct intel_soc_bw_params *soc_bw_params;
>>
>> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>> return;
>>
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 11)
>> + return;
>> +
>> dram_info = intel_dram_info(display);
>> + soc_bw_params = get_soc_bw_params(display);
>>
>> /*
>> * Starting with Xe3p_LPD, the hardware tells us whether memory has ECC
>> @@ -809,28 +878,25 @@ void intel_bw_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
>>
>> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30) {
>> if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 3002)
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &xe3lpd_3002_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &xe3lpd_3002_sa_info);
>> else
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &xe3lpd_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &xe3lpd_sa_info);
>> } else if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) >= 1401 && display->platform.dgfx) {
>> - if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC)
>> - xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &xe2_hpd_ecc_sa_info);
>> - else
>> - xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &xe2_hpd_sa_info);
>> + xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params);
>> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &mtl_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &mtl_sa_info);
>> } else if (display->platform.dg2) {
>> dg2_get_bw_info(display);
>> } else if (display->platform.alderlake_p) {
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &adlp_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &adlp_sa_info);
>> } else if (display->platform.alderlake_s) {
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &adls_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &adls_sa_info);
>> } else if (display->platform.rocketlake) {
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &rkl_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &rkl_sa_info);
>> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 12) {
>> - tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &tgl_sa_info);
>> + tgl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &tgl_sa_info);
>> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 11) {
>> - icl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, &icl_sa_info);
>> + icl_get_bw_info(display, dram_info, soc_bw_params, &icl_sa_info);
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> 2.53.0
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 19:19 [PATCH v3 0/5] drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915/bw: Don't call intel_dram_info() too early Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-15 8:26 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract platform-specific parameters Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-15 15:41 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-15 16:49 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-05-15 17:54 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/i915/bw: Deduplicate intel_sa_info instances Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/i915/bw: Rename struct intel_sa_info to intel_display_bw_params Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract get_display_bw_params() Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-14 20:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-14 21:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-15 14:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3427613dfaf60b4fd322d58221dd78043e30caff@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox