From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:43:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35143d0e-a79b-44ed-9ee7-228d48684a98@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213213901.2191463-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On 2/13/2025 13:39, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> When the Xe was first introduced, we intentionally avoided escalating
> GuC load failures, to not abort mid-probe. Xe is now mature enough and
> we gracefully handle probe failures, so we can start escalating
> immediately.
>
> Note that even without this patch the probe is still aborted because
> the attempt to enable CTs after GuC load will fail and that failure is
> already escalated.
>
> v2: only return success if the load_done variable is 1 (Tejas)
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 1619c0a52db9..407399cc4764 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ static s32 guc_pc_get_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *guc_pc)
> #endif
> #define GUC_LOAD_TIME_WARN_MS 200
>
> -static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +static int guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
Should we add an 'ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION' on this? Make sure CI checks
that GuC load failures are handled gracefully?
Either way, this change as is looks good now.
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
John.
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> struct xe_mmio *mmio = >->mmio;
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,8 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
> delta_ms, xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq(guc_pc), guc_pc_get_cur_freq(guc_pc),
> before_freq, status, count);
> }
> +
> + return load_done == 1 ? 0 : -EIO;
> }
>
> static int __xe_guc_upload(struct xe_guc *guc)
> @@ -1077,14 +1079,16 @@ static int __xe_guc_upload(struct xe_guc *guc)
> goto out;
>
> /* Wait for authentication */
> - guc_wait_ucode(guc);
> + ret = guc_wait_ucode(guc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
>
> xe_uc_fw_change_status(&guc->fw, XE_UC_FIRMWARE_RUNNING);
> return 0;
>
> out:
> xe_uc_fw_change_status(&guc->fw, XE_UC_FIRMWARE_LOAD_FAIL);
> - return 0 /* FIXME: ret, don't want to stop load currently */;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int vf_guc_min_load_for_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 21:39 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-02-13 22:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:06 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:24 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:26 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:27 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 22:43 ` John Harrison [this message]
2025-02-13 22:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-14 9:58 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-02-14 18:39 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:27 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Escalate GuC load failure immediately (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:27 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:47 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:49 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 20:10 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 22:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35143d0e-a79b-44ed-9ee7-228d48684a98@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox