From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/xe/pf: Access VF's register using dedicated MMIO view
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:20:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <362dca9f-7505-4a4d-b9d9-46d145003c19@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <176138561254.54467.5466084095567880064@97596180aaec>
On 10/25/2025 11:46 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/xe/pf: Access VF's register using dedicated MMIO view
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/156516/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/156516/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-156516v1/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-156516v1/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-3984-29a7e04b0cce50ab0bcd603c040d35682a643c78_FULL -> xe-pw-156516v1_FULL
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-156516v1_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-156516v1_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-156516v1_FULL:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@xe_pmu@engine-activity-most-load@engine-drm_xe_engine_class_video_decode0:
> o shard-adlp: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3984-29a7e04b0cce50ab0bcd603c040d35682a643c78/shard-adlp-8/igt@xe_pmu@engine-activity-most-load@engine-drm_xe_engine_class_video_decode0.html> -> FAIL <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-156516v1/shard-adlp-4/igt@xe_pmu@engine-activity-most-load@engine-drm_xe_engine_class_video_decode0.html> +5 other tests fail
(xe_pmu:5125) DEBUG: [0] Engine active ticks: after 0, before 0 delta 0
(xe_pmu:5125) DEBUG: [0] Engine total ticks: after 19250333, before 47827 delta 19202506
(xe_pmu:5125) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_all_engines, file ../tests/intel/xe_pmu.c:258:
(xe_pmu:5125) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(engine_active_ticks) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(engine_total_ticks) && (double)(engine_active_ticks) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(engine_total_ticks)
(xe_pmu:5125) CRITICAL: 'engine_active_ticks' != 'engine_total_ticks' (0.000000 not within +10.0%/-10.0% tolerance of 19202506.000000)
doesn't look like related as change updates only existing small part of the VF FLR code (not related to the later execution of the VF/PF.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 20:58 [PATCH] drm/xe/pf: Access VF's register using dedicated MMIO view Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-24 21:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-24 22:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-24 22:27 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
2025-10-24 23:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-26 9:43 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-25 9:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
2025-10-27 16:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-10-27 16:42 ` [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-27 16:57 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=362dca9f-7505-4a4d-b9d9-46d145003c19@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox