public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>,
	Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable panel power earlier
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:57:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36f6ab153c13cf5bf0e4db6969a95db9c3eb6ddb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116085455.571766-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

On Fri, 16 Jan 2026, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
>
> Move intel_pps_on() to intel_dpll_mgr PLL enabling
> .enable function hook to enable panel power earlier.
> We need to do this to make sure we are following the
> modeset sequences of Bspec. This had changed when we
> moved the PLL PHY enablement for CX0 from .enable_clock
> to dpll.enable hook

So I really hate this.

Yeah, maybe it follows the spec now, but what connection does the DPLL
manager have with the panel power sequencing?

Absolutely nothing.

The DPLL manager has no business calling PPS functions.

Currently only the g4x and DDI encoder code does PPS power calls, and
they're the only ones who should manage PPS.

>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3: 
> - Rather than splitting the PHY enablement sequence, enable PPS
> earlier (Imre)

Please point me at the review comment. I couldn't find anything that
would suggest moving the PPS calls to the DPLL manager.

Please let's not do this.

BR,
Jani.


>   
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c      | 6 ++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index cb91d07cdaa6..1784fa687c03 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2653,8 +2653,10 @@ static void mtl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	/* 3. Select Thunderbolt */
>  	mtl_port_buf_ctl_io_selection(encoder);
>  
> -	/* 4. Enable Panel Power if PPS is required */
> -	intel_pps_on(intel_dp);
> +	/*
> +	 * 4. Enable Panel Power if PPS is required
> +	 *    moved to intel_dpll_mgr .enable hook
> +	 */
>  
>  	/* 5. Enable the port PLL */
>  	intel_ddi_enable_clock(encoder, crtc_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 9aa84a430f09..b5655c734c53 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>  #include "intel_hti.h"
>  #include "intel_mg_phy_regs.h"
>  #include "intel_pch_refclk.h"
> +#include "intel_pps.h"
>  #include "intel_step.h"
>  #include "intel_tc.h"
>  
> @@ -4401,6 +4402,10 @@ static void mtl_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
>  	if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !encoder))
>  		return;
>  
> +	/* Enable Panel Power if PPS is required */
> +	if (intel_encoder_is_dp(encoder))
> +		intel_pps_on(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder));
> +
>  	intel_mtl_pll_enable(encoder, pll, dpll_hw_state);
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-20 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-16  8:54 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix Cx0 Suspend Resume issue Suraj Kandpal
2026-01-16  8:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable panel power earlier Suraj Kandpal
2026-01-20 13:57   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-01-20 13:57     ` Jani Nikula
2026-01-22 18:02       ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  6:13     ` Dibin Moolakadan Subrahmanian
2026-01-16  8:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/cx0: Clear response ready & error bit Suraj Kandpal
2026-01-16  8:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/cx0: Rename intel_clear_response_ready flag Suraj Kandpal
2026-01-19  6:43   ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-01-16  9:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Fix Cx0 Suspend Resume issue (rev3) Patchwork
2026-01-16  9:35 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-01-16 11:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36f6ab153c13cf5bf0e4db6969a95db9c3eb6ddb@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox