Re: Merging the xe / ttm shrinker series?

["Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 14:04 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.11.24 um 12:22 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
> > Hi, Christian,
> > 
> > On Sun, 2024-11-03 at 13:38 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > Hi, Christian,
> > > 
> > > The TTM shrinker series is now at v12 with all patches R-B:d.
> > > 
> > > Ack to merge through drm-xe-next?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > Gentle ping on this,
> > The requested change of the ttm_backup interface done and MBrost
> > has
> > extended his R-B.
> 
> Yeah and you guys keep pushing stuff on my TODO list additionally to
> the 
> stuff the AMD guys are pushing for.

Yes, I think perhaps we need to communicate priorities from Intel's
side so that things with high priority doesn't get stalled, although
feedback is valuable also on work that is for "when time allows". Do
you see a way we can make reviews on dma-buf, drm_exec, TTM scale a bit
better?

> 
> Give me a few more days, it looked mostly good. I just couldn't wrap
> my 
> head around splitting the huge pages so far.

That's fine, although moving forward I think we need a way to relax the
merge criterion at least for TTM to have the review process scale a bit
better. Could we perhaps work towards adding reviewers to TTM
MAINTAINERS so that an R-B from a reviewer is sufficient unless there
are unresolved concerns from your or another maintainer?

Thanks,
Thomas


> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> > 
>