Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: "Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV policy settings over debugfs
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:05:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a6d8ca5-eb83-4c62-87cc-80bce1d04a4d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zia83fbRFA7XrXFh@intel.com>



On 22.04.2024 21:39, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> We already have functions to configure SR-IOV policies.
>> Allow to tweak those policy settings over debugfs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> index 8909bb950a8b..3a83af7aa039 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>  #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_control.h"
>>  #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.h"
>>  #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
>> +#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h"
>>  #include "xe_pm.h"
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -76,6 +77,54 @@ static const struct drm_info_list pf_info[] = {
>>  	},
>>  };
>>  
>> +/*
>> + *      /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
>> + *      ├── gt0
>> + *      │   ├── pf
>> + *      │   │   ├── reset_engine
>> + *      │   │   ├── sample_period
>> + *      │   │   ├── sched_if_idle
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY, TYPE, FORMAT)		\
>> +										\
>> +static int POLICY##_set(void *data, u64 val)					\
>> +{										\
>> +	struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data);					\
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);					\
>> +	int err;								\
>> +										\
>> +	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);							\
>> +	err = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_##POLICY(gt, val);			\
>> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);							\
> 
> I like that this takes care of the runtime_pm in a 'global' way without duplication...
> 
>> +										\
>> +	return err;								\
>> +}										\
>> +										\
>> +static int POLICY##_get(void *data, u64 *val)					\
>> +{										\
>> +	struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data);					\
>> +										\
>> +	*val = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_get_##POLICY(gt);				\
>> +	return 0;								\
>> +}										\
>> +										\
>> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY##_fops, POLICY##_get, POLICY##_set, FORMAT)
>> +
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(reset_engine, bool, "%llu\n");
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sched_if_idle, bool, "%llu\n");
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sample_period, u32, "%llu\n");
> 
> ... but, is there any other way we could accomplish this without this style
> that hides function... I hate when I have to understand anything in i915-guc
> code because you cannot navigate or grep for the functions that are declared
> with magic macros like this.

but such template macros are quite widely used (at least for sysfs)

$ cgrep ssize_t.*\\#.*show.*\\\\ | wc -l
189

and IMO it's better to have one template than replicate very similar
code N times with just one line difference

besides this are static functions, no need to grep anywhere else

> 
> but this is my only complain and no big suggestions. I would like to hear
> from the xe maintainers here.
> 
> for the debugfs entries and rpm handling and everything I like that.
> 
>> +
>> +static void pf_add_policy_attrs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *parent)
>> +{
>> +	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt == extract_gt(parent));
>> +	xe_gt_assert(gt, PFID == extract_vfid(parent));
>> +
>> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("reset_engine", 0644, parent, parent, &reset_engine_fops);
>> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sched_if_idle", 0644, parent, parent, &sched_if_idle_fops);
>> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sample_period_ms", 0644, parent, parent, &sample_period_fops);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   *      /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
>>   *      ├── gt0
>> @@ -261,6 +310,7 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
>>  	pfdentry->d_inode->i_private = gt;
>>  
>>  	drm_debugfs_create_files(pf_info, ARRAY_SIZE(pf_info), pfdentry, minor);
>> +	pf_add_policy_attrs(gt, pfdentry);
>>  	pf_add_config_attrs(gt, pfdentry, PFID);
>>  
>>  	for (n = 1; n <= totalvfs; n++) {
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-18 20:34 [PATCH 0/3] PF: Expose GT-level SR-IOV details over debugfs Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-18 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV VFs configuration " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-22 16:43   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-04-22 17:12     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-18 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV VF control commands " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-22 16:55   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-04-18 20:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV policy settings " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-22 17:02   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-04-22 17:24     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-04-22 19:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-22 20:05     ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-04-22 20:28       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-18 22:24 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV VFs configuration " Patchwork
2024-04-18 22:24 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-18 22:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-18 22:39 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-18 22:43 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-18 22:44 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-18 23:40 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-20 16:05 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a6d8ca5-eb83-4c62-87cc-80bce1d04a4d@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox