From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
"Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] drm/xe/uc: Disable GuC communication on hardware initialization error.
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 19:36:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a784641-2436-4ead-88e2-88ef33fd39ac@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB54443606D202241399E6692EE54FA@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 07.07.2025 15:56, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong, Zhanjun <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2025 2:39 PM
> To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Dong, Zhanjun <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>; Wajdeczko, Michal <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>; Summers, Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>; Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v8] drm/xe/uc: Disable GuC communication on hardware initialization error.
>>
>> Disable GuC communication on Xe micro controller hardware initialization
>> error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/4917
>>
>> ---
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
>>
>> Change list:
>> v8: Fix kernel-doc style
>> Add error handling in vf_guc_min_load_for_hwconfig
>> v7: Add kernel-doc for xe_guc_disable_communication
>> Unset submission_state.enabled as well
>> v6: Skip disable ct on xe_guc_enable_communication error
>> v5: Set wedge is excessive action, revert back to disable ct
>> v4: Fix typo and add new line
>> v3: v2 CI re-run
>> v2: Remove unnecessary jump to err-out
>> Drop disable ct, switch to set wedge
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>> index 8573957facae..6643a2cb898b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>> @@ -1219,13 +1219,17 @@ static int vf_guc_min_load_for_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>
>> ret = xe_gt_sriov_vf_connect(gt);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> ret = xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_runtime(gt);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + xe_guc_disable_communication(guc);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -1337,6 +1341,18 @@ int xe_guc_enable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * xe_guc_disable_communication() - Disable GuC communication
>> + * @guc: The GuC object
>> + *
>> + * This function will disable the GuC communication.
>> + */
>> +void xe_guc_disable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> +{
>> + guc->submission_state.enabled = false;
>> + xe_guc_ct_disable(&guc->ct);
>
> Didn't this used to just be a wrapper for xe_guc_ct_disable?
>
> ... Well, I suppose needing to set the submission state enabled to false
> would also be a rather important step, so it's probably good that was added.
hmm, while it might be a required step for shutdown, putting it here
looks like a random choice, it's unbalanced what "enable_communication"
did and also looks like a violation of the layering, as guc_submit code
has its own files and we shouldn't touch internals from the outside
+ @Matt
>
> Everything else is LGTM, so
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> -Jonathan Cavitt
>
>> +}
>> +
>> int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
>> {
>> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>> index 22cf019a11bf..20823b821f7d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int xe_guc_reset(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_upload(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_min_load_for_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_enable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> +void xe_guc_disable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_opt_in_features_enable(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> void xe_guc_notify(struct xe_guc *guc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
>> index 6431ba3a2c53..1012fe84b379 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>> #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
>> #include "xe_guc.h"
>> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
>> #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>> #include "xe_guc_engine_activity.h"
>> #include "xe_huc.h"
>> @@ -158,7 +159,7 @@ static int vf_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
>>
>> err = xe_gt_sriov_vf_connect(uc_to_gt(uc));
>> if (err)
>> - return err;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> uc->guc.submission_state.enabled = true;
>>
>> @@ -168,9 +169,13 @@ static int vf_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
>>
>> err = xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(uc_to_gt(uc));
>> if (err)
>> - return err;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + xe_guc_disable_communication(&uc->guc);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -202,15 +207,15 @@ int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
>>
>> ret = xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(uc_to_gt(uc));
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> ret = xe_guc_post_load_init(&uc->guc);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> ret = xe_guc_pc_start(&uc->guc.pc);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_out;
>>
>> xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(&uc->guc);
>>
>> @@ -222,6 +227,10 @@ int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
>> xe_gsc_load_start(&uc->gsc);
>>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + xe_guc_disable_communication(&uc->guc);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> int xe_uc_reset_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-07 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 21:38 [PATCH v8] drm/xe/uc: Disable GuC communication on hardware initialization error Zhanjun Dong
2025-07-03 22:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/uc: Disable GuC communication on hardware initialization error. (rev6) Patchwork
2025-07-03 22:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-05 16:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-07-07 15:51 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH v8] drm/xe/uc: Disable GuC communication on hardware initialization error Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-07-07 17:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-07-07 18:30 ` Matthew Brost
2025-07-07 18:34 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-07-07 21:05 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-07-07 18:28 ` Dong, Zhanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a784641-2436-4ead-88e2-88ef33fd39ac@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox