From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Limit max joined dotclock on joiner pipes available
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:47:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f42097b08dd26e10108c3a1f549dd615514cab6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98b730a6-d459-4ee5-a38c-81ad1c830b6c@intel.com>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/7/2026 6:04 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Multiplying the max dotclock based on joiner availability on the
>> platform alone does not take into account the actual pipes (possibly
>> with some fused) available for joining.
>>
>> Limit the max joined dotclock based on the actual pipes available for
>> joining. Add helpers for figuring out the valid primary pipes, based on
>> having the required joiners and amount of consecutive pipes available.
>>
>> v2: Check for consecutive pipes available (Ankit)
>>
>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 829d7a411dcc..c958b2a92cc7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -193,6 +193,53 @@ is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> is_trans_port_sync_slave(crtc_state);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Return a bitmask of all the start indices of consecutive bitfields of size
>> + * width in mask.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned long find_consecutive_bits(unsigned long mask, int width)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long bit, out_mask = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!width)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + for_each_set_bit(bit, &mask, BITS_PER_TYPE(mask)) {
>> + /* For each set bit, see if the following bits are set also */
>> + unsigned long bitfield = GENMASK(bit + width - 1, bit);
>> +
>> + if ((mask & bitfield) == bitfield)
>> + out_mask |= BIT(bit);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return out_mask;
>
> This is very clever!
>
> This fits very nicely with the part where we want to check if joiner is
> supported "for a specific crtc" during compute_config phase.
Yay, thanks!
> This works even for width = 1 as well, but it's better to handle the
> case separately as you have already done, it's intuitive and avoids
> iterating through the bits.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Thanks for the review, pushed the lot to din.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Return a bitmask of all valid joiner primary pipes for joining
>> + * num_joined_pipes pipes. For completeness, return all valid pipes for
>> + * num_joined_pipes == 1.
>> + *
>> + * Return 0 if the platform doesn't support joining for the requested number of
>> + * pipes, or there are not enough consecutive pipes available.
>> + */
>> +u8 intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display, int num_joined_pipes)
>> +{
>> + if (num_joined_pipes == 1) {
>> + return DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(display)->pipe_mask;
>> + } else if (num_joined_pipes == 2) {
>> + if (!HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(display) && !HAS_BIGJOINER(display))
>> + return 0;
>> + } else if (num_joined_pipes == 4) {
>> + if (!HAS_ULTRAJOINER(display))
>> + return 0;
>> + } else {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return find_consecutive_bits(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(display)->pipe_mask, num_joined_pipes);
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum pipe joiner_primary_pipe(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> {
>> return ffs(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
>> @@ -8113,9 +8160,9 @@ static int max_dotclock(struct intel_display *display)
>> {
>> int max_dotclock = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>>
>> - if (HAS_ULTRAJOINER(display))
>> + if (intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(display, 4))
>> max_dotclock *= 4;
>> - else if (HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(display) || HAS_BIGJOINER(display))
>> + else if (intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(display, 2))
>> max_dotclock *= 2;
>>
>> return max_dotclock;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> index 57ea4f2edf2a..e7ecae9d2d21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ intel_cpu_transcoder_mode_valid(struct intel_display *display,
>> enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct intel_display *display, enum port port);
>> bool is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
>> bool is_trans_port_sync_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
>> +u8 intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display, int num_joined_pipes);
>> u8 intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 12:34 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/display: Limit invalid joiner combinations harder Jani Nikula
2026-08-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Limit max joined dotclock on joiner pipes available Jani Nikula
2026-08-10 11:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-08-11 12:47 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-08-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/dp: Limit for_each_joiner_candidate() " Jani Nikula
2026-08-10 11:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-08-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Limit compute config joining to pipes that can actually join Jani Nikula
2026-08-10 11:41 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-08-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/debugfs: Reject invalid force_joined_pipes harder Jani Nikula
2026-08-10 11:43 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-08-07 13:00 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/display: Limit invalid joiner combinations harder Patchwork
2026-08-07 13:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-07 13:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-07 22:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f42097b08dd26e10108c3a1f549dd615514cab6@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox