From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1772D25B4E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975EE10E125; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="At3dCMaD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3150E10E125 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:42:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769604145; x=1801140145; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=TCkCR6CMzah7og+OIuj7A3fhvqQK0va0N6QTGtS5OTA=; b=At3dCMaDM7p9XIAV18/HiuyVfsmxD2piKYZx1UnC65XwFqqGhf1dQnO+ 1v2FFUBuH6xyQt+XUYXrqID92qIwimNrHVO4vHAbsgJczF3SyM60cBSDL UruM0AavmPHWKmn3WyiT/qr58Y4qXBPbAGrBHNUnRLDGAX226u73Z13i1 LT+FKdVe1HBn2gcqpQ7NGbUtcUxoHZJp8FuHS0Uh9jdOzsRUotT1sKqbd 94F9jhylGO7Rvq1glMGE2HJ1lSlZmmJbx2opwV35AKXAG5bwm6KSTbrlH qKJytoRlqlT9Q//7B9m+F0O9I+0ZrM/ikDj34lwVG1O4hFNpshk97NImo w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2zXpC3UEQ1+aE76WmbG5Fg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gBS+CYuqStGlaaCfF3aK5Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11684"; a="81446767" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,258,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="81446767" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2026 04:42:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: giDsuR+vTo+3XVKo0WwXjQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +t9nQ5ZFTPuRipiuorzxZg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,258,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="212743248" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.14]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2026 04:42:21 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:42:17 +0200 (EET) To: "Michael J. Ruhl" cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, Hans de Goede , matthew.brost@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, david.e.box@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get In-Reply-To: <20260127182418.640701-9-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Message-ID: <3f8ecbc2-e5bd-37d7-faf9-f5e090845243@linux.intel.com> References: <20260127182418.640701-7-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> <20260127182418.640701-9-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Tue, 27 Jan 2026, Michael J. Ruhl wrote: > Crashlog needs to be collected at all times. The current pm > check assumes telemetry only. > > Update read path to enable device for crashlog instances. > > Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c > index 4ebb4dbe1c9b..44607f1eaa88 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_off > { > struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev); > void __iomem *telem_addr = xe->mmio.regs + BMG_TELEMETRY_OFFSET; > + u32 cap_type = FIELD_GET(GUID_CAP_TYPE, guid); > u32 mem_region; > u32 offset; > int ret; > @@ -160,9 +161,18 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_off > if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region) > return -ENODEV; > > - /* indicate that we are not at an appropriate power level */ > - if (!xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe)) > - return -ENODATA; > + /* make sure that we are not at an inappropriate power level */ > + switch (cap_type) { > + case CRASHLOG: > + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe); While this is xe code so I don't know much about it, it feels odd to me to just add a get without put or explanation in the changelog why this change doesn't result in imbalance. -- i. > + break; > + case TELEMETRY: > + if (!xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe)) > + return -ENODATA; > + break; > + case WATCHER: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* set SoC re-mapper index register based on GUID memory region */ > xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, mem_region); >