From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/xe: Access port only after lock acquired
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:43:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40e1ff44-2a54-4d99-bbc9-83738821c1f0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604104516.766058-1-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Hi Tejas,
On 6/4/2024 12:45 PM, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> Currently, port is accessed before lock of port is acquired.
> As followed at other places, lets acquire lock before accessing
> for even better sync up.
The lock is for protecting port->active list so think the code here is
fine.
Regards,
Nirmoy
> V2:
> - Add port->active check under lock
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> index db906117db6d..fcbc3bac1ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> @@ -210,15 +210,16 @@ static void xe_execlist_port_wake_locked(struct xe_execlist_port *port,
>
> static void xe_execlist_make_active(struct xe_execlist_exec_queue *exl)
> {
> - struct xe_execlist_port *port = exl->port;
> + struct xe_execlist_port *port;
> enum xe_exec_queue_priority priority = exl->q->sched_props.priority;
>
> XE_WARN_ON(priority == XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_UNSET);
> XE_WARN_ON(priority < 0);
> - XE_WARN_ON(priority >= ARRAY_SIZE(exl->port->active));
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&port->lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&exl->port->lock);
>
> + XE_WARN_ON(priority >= ARRAY_SIZE(exl->port->active));
> + port = exl->port;
> if (exl->active_priority != priority &&
> exl->active_priority != XE_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY_UNSET) {
> /* Priority changed, move it to the right list */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 10:45 [PATCH V2] drm/xe: Access port only after lock acquired Tejas Upadhyay
2024-06-05 0:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Access port only after lock acquired (rev2) Patchwork
2024-06-05 0:20 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-05 0:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-05 0:32 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-05 0:33 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-05 0:34 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-05 1:01 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-05 8:43 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-06-05 9:44 ` [PATCH V2] drm/xe: Access port only after lock acquired Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-06-05 9:19 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe: Access port only after lock acquired (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40e1ff44-2a54-4d99-bbc9-83738821c1f0@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox