From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe: Add up-to-date implementation for Wa_14026539277
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ff9314-35a0-49af-906b-e49298837d1f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878q61c0dm.fsf@intel.com>
On 19/08/2026 21:37, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> writes:
>
>> On 24/07/2026 22:44, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>>> Wa_14026539277 is a temporary workaround that targets only A*
>>> steppings of graphics version 35.10 and requires that we avoid using
>>> 2-way coherency for device-cacheable memory accesses. For
>>> driver-internal usage, we convert those configurations to be
>>> device-uncached and 1-way-coherent; on the UAPI side, we reject
>>> VM_BIND/MADVISE calls that are 2-way-coherent and leave it up to
>>> userspace to select the alternative option that is most appropriate to
>>> their usage.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Add missing bits to convert the PAT value to device-uncacheable in
>>> wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(). (Sashiko)
>>> - Also validate the PAT index in the DRM_XE_VM_MADVISE
>>> ioctl. (Sashiko)
>>> - Match against the graphics IP instead of the platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h | 10 +++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 16 ++++++----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 5 ++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c | 3 ++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 1 +
>>> 6 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> index 7060f66e1d63..10374022f1d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> @@ -82,6 +82,16 @@ bool xe_pat_index_get_comp_en(struct xe_device *xe, u16 pat_index);
>>> */
>>> u16 xe_pat_index_get_l3_policy(struct xe_device *xe, u16 pat_index);
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved - Is this PAT index reserved from
>>> + * use due to Wa_14026539277?
>>> + * @xe: xe device
>>> + * @pat_index: The pat_index to query
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: a boolean indicating whether the PAT index is reserved or not.
>>> + */
>>> +bool xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(struct xe_device *xe, u16 pat_index);
>>> +
>>> #define xe_cache_pat_idx(xe, cache_mode) ({ \
>>> const struct xe_device *__xedev = (xe); \
>>> enum xe_cache_level __mode = (cache_mode); \
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> index 5189419a0593..c4b8023cb8a2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> @@ -836,14 +836,18 @@ static void override_has_cached_pt(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> struct xe_gt *gt;
>>> u8 id;
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * Wa_16029380221: The affected GT will always use non-coherent
>>> - * access to page tables, so we must do uncached writes from the
>>> - * CPU.
>>> - */
>>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
>>> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Wa_16029380221: The affected GT will always use
>>> + * non-coherent access to page tables, so we must do
>>> + * uncached writes from the CPU.
>>> + */
>>> if (XE_GT_WA(gt, 16029380221))
>>> xe->info.has_cached_pt = false;
>>> +
>>> + if (XE_GT_WA(gt, 14026539277))
>>> + xe->info.has_cached_pt = false;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> index a5fe1beec652..a9cde12eba70 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> @@ -313,6 +313,37 @@ u16 xe_pat_index_get_l3_policy(struct xe_device *xe, u16 pat_index)
>>> return REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_L3_POLICY, xe->pat.table[pat_index].value);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +bool xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(struct xe_device *xe, u16 pat_index)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt;
>>> + u8 id;
>>> + bool has_wa = false;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
>>> + if (XE_GT_WA(gt, 14026539277)) {
>>> + has_wa = true;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return has_wa && xe_pat_index_get_l3_policy(xe, pat_index) != XE_L3_POLICY_UC &&
>>
>> Just to make sure I understand. Why do we bother to check the l3 policy
>> here? Do we not just want to ban all 2WAY from uapi pov? The l3/l4
>> policy can often be promoted via the per MOCS setting, so even if UC
>> here it can be made WB via MOCS. Is this OK?
>
> That's a good point.
>
> The workaround instructions were to avoid using GT-cacheable
> 2-way-coherent configurations, that's why I was allowing 2-way coherency
> for XE_L3_POLICY_UC, but I did not think of the scenario of the cache
> policy being overridden by MOCS. Thanks for pointing it out!
>
> Yeah, it seems we should use a bigger hammer and disallow any 2-way
> coherency then. I'll change this on the next version.
Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
>
>>
>>> + xe_pat_index_get_coh_mode(xe, pat_index) == XE_COH_2WAY;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static u32 wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 value)
>>> +{
>>> + if (XE_GT_WA(gt, 14026539277)) {
>>> + if (REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_L3_POLICY, value) != XE_L3_POLICY_UC &&
>>> + REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_COH_MODE, value) == XE_COH_2WAY) {
>>> + value &= ~(XE2_L3_POLICY | XE2_COH_MODE);
>>> + value |= REG_FIELD_PREP(XE2_L3_POLICY, XE_L3_POLICY_UC) |
>>> + REG_FIELD_PREP(XE2_COH_MODE, XE_COH_1WAY);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return value;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static const struct xe_pat_table_entry *gt_pta_entry(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>> {
>>> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>>> @@ -373,18 +404,22 @@ static void program_pat_mcr(struct xe_gt *gt, const struct xe_pat_table_entry ta
>>>
>>> for (int i = 0; i < n_entries; i++) {
>>> struct xe_reg_mcr reg_mcr = XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_INDEX(i));
>>> + u32 pat = wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, table[i].value);
>>>
>>> - xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, reg_mcr, table[i].value);
>>> + xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, reg_mcr, pat);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (xe->pat.pat_ats)
>>> - xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_ATS), xe->pat.pat_ats->value);
>>> + xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_ATS),
>>> + wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, xe->pat.pat_ats->value));
>>>
>>> if (pta_entry)
>>> - xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_PTA), pta_entry->value);
>>> + xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_PTA),
>>> + wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, pta_entry->value));
>>>
>>> if (tr_pta_entry)
>>> - xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_TR_PTA), tr_pta_entry->value);
>>> + xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_TR_PTA),
>>> + wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, tr_pta_entry->value));
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int xelp_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> @@ -534,13 +569,16 @@ static int xe2_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> drm_printf(p, "PAT table: (* = reserved entry)\n");
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < xe->pat.n_entries; i++) {
>>> + bool rsvd = !xe->pat.table[i].valid ||
>>> + xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(xe, i);
>>> +
>>> if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
>>> pat = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, XE_REG(_PAT_INDEX(i)));
>>> else
>>> pat = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE_REG_MCR(_PAT_INDEX(i)));
>>>
>>> xe_pat_index_label(label, sizeof(label), i);
>>> - xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, label, pat, !xe->pat.table[i].valid);
>>> + xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, label, pat, rsvd);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -747,9 +785,14 @@ int xe_pat_dump_sw_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> for (u32 i = 0; i < xe->pat.n_entries; i++) {
>>> u32 pat = xe->pat.table[i].value;
>>>
>>> + pat = wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, pat);
>>> +
>>> if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20) {
>>> + bool rsvd = !xe->pat.table[i].valid ||
>>> + xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(xe, i);
>>> +
>>> xe_pat_index_label(label, sizeof(label), i);
>>> - xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, label, pat, !xe->pat.table[i].valid);
>>> + xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, label, pat, rsvd);
>>> } else if (xe->info.platform == XE_METEORLAKE) {
>>> xelpg_pat_entry_dump(p, i, pat);
>>> } else if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
>>> @@ -764,6 +807,8 @@ int xe_pat_dump_sw_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> if (pta_entry) {
>>> u32 pat = pta_entry->value;
>>>
>>> + pat = wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, pat);
>>> +
>>> drm_printf(p, "Page Table Access:\n");
>>> xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, "PTA_MODE", pat, false);
>>> }
>>> @@ -771,6 +816,8 @@ int xe_pat_dump_sw_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> if (tr_pta_entry) {
>>> u32 pat = tr_pta_entry->value;
>>>
>>> + pat = wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, pat);
>>> +
>>> drm_printf(p, "TRTT Page Table Access:\n");
>>> xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, "TR_PTA_MODE", pat, false);
>>> }
>>> @@ -778,6 +825,8 @@ int xe_pat_dump_sw_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>> if (xe->pat.pat_ats) {
>>> u32 pat = xe->pat.pat_ats->value;
>>>
>>> + pat = wa_14026539277_fixup_pat_value(gt, pat);
>>> +
>>> drm_printf(p, "PCIe ATS/PASID:\n");
>>> xe->pat.ops->entry_dump(p, "PAT_ATS ", pat, false);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>> index 9e0176861cb6..64c03c669630 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>> @@ -3697,6 +3697,11 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_check_args(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vm *vm,
>>> goto free_bind_ops;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(xe, pat_index))) {
>>> + err = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto free_bind_ops;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, op > DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_PREFETCH) ||
>>> XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, flags & ~SUPPORTED_FLAGS) ||
>>> XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, obj && (is_null || is_cpu_addr_mirror)) ||
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>>> index 0474768a38aa..265273294756 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>>> @@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ static bool check_pat_args_are_sane(struct xe_device *xe,
>>> u16 coh_mode = xe_pat_index_get_coh_mode(xe, pat_index);
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, xe_pat_wa_14026539277_reserved(xe, pat_index)))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Using coh_none with CPU cached buffers is not allowed on iGPU.
>>> * On iGPU the GPU shares the LLC with the CPU, so with coh_none
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>>> index f02ac9bf7424..d53e7f75814b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>>> @@ -71,4 +71,5 @@
>>> GRAPHICS_VERSION(3511)
>>> 16029897822 MEDIA_VERSION(3500)
>>> GRAPHICS_VERSION(3510)
>>> +14026539277 GRAPHICS_VERSION(3510), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)
>>> 14027054324 GRAPHICS_VERSION(3511)
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 21:44 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/xe: Update Wa_14026539277 Gustavo Sousa
2026-07-24 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe: Extract override_has_cached_pt() Gustavo Sousa
2026-07-28 12:42 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-24 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "drm/xe/nvlp: Implement Wa_14026539277" Gustavo Sousa
2026-08-19 13:23 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-24 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe: Add up-to-date implementation for Wa_14026539277 Gustavo Sousa
2026-07-28 12:40 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-28 13:25 ` Souza, Jose
2026-08-19 13:53 ` Matthew Auld
2026-08-19 20:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-08-20 9:05 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-07-24 22:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Update Wa_14026539277 Patchwork
2026-07-24 22:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-24 22:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ff9314-35a0-49af-906b-e49298837d1f@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox