From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 13:29:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449707fb-8701-4806-a301-c511d1894957@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251006115013.1305805-2-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
On 10/6/2025 1:50 PM, Nareshkumar Gollakoti wrote:
> Due to SLA agreement between PF and VFs, multi CCS mode can't
> be enabled when VFs are already enabled.
> Similarly, enabling VFs is disabled when multi CCS mode enabled.
s/is disabled/must be blocked
>
> v2:
> - function xe_device_is_vf_enabled has been refactored to
> xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled and moved to xe_sriov_pf_helper.h.
> - The code now distinctly checks for SR-IOV VF mode and
> SR-IOV PF with VFs enabled.
> - Log messages have been updated to explicitly state the current mode.
> - The function xe_multi_ccs_mode_enabled is moved to xe_device.h
>
> v3: Described missed arg documentation for xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled
>
> v4:
> - sysfs interface for CCS mode is not initialized
> when operating in SRIOV VF Mode.
> - xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled() check is sufficient while CCS mode
> enablement.
> - remove unnecessary comments as flow is self explanatory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 10 ++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_sriov.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 32cc6323b7f6..986f9cabb897 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,14 @@ static inline bool xe_device_has_lmtt(struct xe_device *xe)
> return IS_DGFX(xe);
> }
>
> +static inline bool xe_multi_ccs_mode_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + /* Multi CCS mode supported exclusively on GT0 */
> + struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
> +
> + return gt->ccs_mode > 1;
> +}
> +
> u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size);
>
> void xe_device_snapshot_print(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> index 50fffc9ebf62..91908faf3768 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sysfs.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> #include "xe_sriov.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
beware that most of the helpers in this header are for PF-only, so including them in non-PF code must be done with care
>
> static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
> {
> @@ -117,9 +118,8 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> u32 num_engines, num_slices;
> int ret;
>
> - if (IS_SRIOV(xe)) {
> - xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Can't change compute mode when running as %s\n",
> - xe_sriov_mode_to_string(xe_device_sriov_mode(xe)));
> + if (xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled(xe)) {
> + xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Can't change CCS mode in SR-IOV PF Mode with VFs Enabled\n");
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
this is still potentially racy, can you consider similar approach as it was done in eudebug [1] which has the same problem but is trying to close the race by using a flag protected by a mutex ?
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/678636/?series=155452&rev=1
> }
>
> @@ -184,6 +184,8 @@ static void xe_gt_ccs_mode_sysfs_fini(void *arg)
> * The number of available compute slices is exposed to user through a per-gt
> * 'num_cslices' sysfs interface.
> *
> + * The sysfs interface for CCS mode is not set up in SRIOV VF Mode.
> + *
> * Returns: Returns error value for failure and 0 for success.
> */
> int xe_gt_ccs_mode_sysfs_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> @@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ int xe_gt_ccs_mode_sysfs_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> int err;
>
> - if (!xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(gt))
> + if (!xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(gt) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> return 0;
>
> err = sysfs_create_files(gt->sysfs, gt_ccs_mode_attrs);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_sriov.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_sriov.c
> index 9c1c9e669b04..0715f87a5ecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_sriov.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_sriov.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ static int pf_enable_vfs(struct xe_device *xe, int num_vfs)
> xe_assert(xe, num_vfs <= total_vfs);
> xe_sriov_dbg(xe, "enabling %u VF%s\n", num_vfs, str_plural(num_vfs));
>
> + if (xe_multi_ccs_mode_enabled(xe)) {
> + xe_sriov_info(xe, "Disable multi-CCS mode before enabling VF's\n");
> + return -ECANCELED;
> + }
> +
> err = xe_sriov_pf_wait_ready(xe);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> index dd1df950b021..e26837091375 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf_helpers.h
> @@ -43,4 +43,17 @@ static inline struct mutex *xe_sriov_pf_master_mutex(struct xe_device *xe)
> return &xe->sriov.pf.master_lock;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled() - Determines if the PF has any VFs enabled
> + * @xe: ptr to xe_device
> + *
> + * Return: true if one or more VFs are enabled on the PF, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled(const struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> +
> + return pci_num_vf(pdev) > 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-06 11:50 [PATCH V4] drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-10-06 13:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning (rev5) Patchwork
2025-10-06 13:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-06 17:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-07 11:29 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-06 8:45 [PATCH V4] drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning Nareshkumar Gollakoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449707fb-8701-4806-a301-c511d1894957@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox