From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/hdcp: Add intel_hdcp_gsc_message to Makefile
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c37e423-10a8-4fa6-8ea9-aaff24e66e04@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240209101412.1326176-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Hey,
Where is xe_hdcp_gsc_message.c defined in this series?
I would move this part there.
On 2024-02-09 11:14, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> Add intel_hdcp_gsc_message to Makefile and add corresponding
> changes to xe_hdcp_gsc.c to make it build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index c531210695db..2b654c908ff3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
> i915-display/intel_global_state.o \
> i915-display/intel_gmbus.o \
> i915-display/intel_hdcp.o \
> + i915-display/intel_hdcp_gsc_message.o \
> i915-display/intel_hdmi.o \
> i915-display/intel_hotplug.o \
> i915-display/intel_hotplug_irq.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
> index aa8c13916bb6..f185465d5682 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
> @@ -5,9 +5,11 @@
>
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <drm/i915_hdcp_interface.h>
>
> #include "abi/gsc_command_header_abi.h"
> #include "intel_hdcp_gsc.h"
> +#include "intel_hdcp_gsc_message.h"
> #include "xe_device_types.h"
> #include "xe_gt.h"
> #include "xe_gsc_proxy.h"
> @@ -113,6 +115,22 @@ static int intel_hdcp_gsc_hdcp2_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static const struct i915_hdcp_ops gsc_hdcp_ops = {
> + .initiate_hdcp2_session = intel_hdcp_gsc_initiate_session,
> + .verify_receiver_cert_prepare_km =
> + intel_hdcp_gsc_verify_receiver_cert_prepare_km,
> + .verify_hprime = intel_hdcp_gsc_verify_hprime,
> + .store_pairing_info = intel_hdcp_gsc_store_pairing_info,
> + .initiate_locality_check = intel_hdcp_gsc_initiate_locality_check,
> + .verify_lprime = intel_hdcp_gsc_verify_lprime,
> + .get_session_key = intel_hdcp_gsc_get_session_key,
> + .repeater_check_flow_prepare_ack =
> + intel_hdcp_gsc_repeater_check_flow_prepare_ack,
> + .verify_mprime = intel_hdcp_gsc_verify_mprime,
> + .enable_hdcp_authentication = intel_hdcp_gsc_enable_authentication,
> + .close_hdcp_session = intel_hdcp_gsc_close_session,
> +};
The changes to xe_hdcp_gsc seems like it should be part of the previous
commit?
Presumably also useful to reorder the Makefile change to before 4/5.
Cheers,
Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 10:14 [PATCH 0/5] XE HDCP Enablement Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/hdcp: Move intel_hdcp_gsc_message def away from header file Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-26 8:18 ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-02-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe/hdcp: Use xe_device struct Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-13 23:16 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-02-14 5:30 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-02-26 8:45 ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-02-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Use gsc_proxy_init_done to check proxy status Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-13 23:22 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-02-26 10:21 ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-02-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe/hdcp: Enable HDCP for XE Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-09 17:50 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 23:30 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-02-14 5:33 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-02-14 17:05 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-02-15 6:12 ` Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-26 11:01 ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-02-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/hdcp: Add intel_hdcp_gsc_message to Makefile Suraj Kandpal
2024-02-16 13:52 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-02-19 5:09 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-02-09 10:56 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for XE HDCP Enablement (rev4) Patchwork
2024-02-09 10:57 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-02-09 10:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-02-09 11:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-09 11:09 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-09 11:10 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-02-09 11:54 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:17 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for XE HDCP Enablement (rev5) Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:18 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:29 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-15 6:31 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-02-15 7:02 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c37e423-10a8-4fa6-8ea9-aaff24e66e04@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox