Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mallesh, Koujalagi" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	<andrealmeid@igalia.com>, <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	<airlied@gmail.com>, <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	<mripard@kernel.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	<karthik.poosa@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/doc: Document DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_COLD_RESET recovery method
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:59:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dc38cbc-0b9d-4615-94be-2f07667b8248@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec1wAFHMZyb9sFW@black.igk.intel.com>


On 21-04-2026 02:00 pm, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 07:00:17PM +0530, Mallesh Koujalagi wrote:
>> When ``WEDGED=cold-reset`` is sent, it indicates a non-recoverable
> This looks like "cold-reset" should be able to recover it, so is it
> really non-recoverable? ;)
I'll revert it as per last rev.
>> device error, only a full power cycle can restore the device.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Add several instead of number to avoid update. (Jani)
>>
>> v3:
>> - Update document with generic scenario. (Riana)
>> - Consistent with terminology. (Raag)
>> - Remove already covered information.
>>
>> v4:
>> - Update doc. (Raag/Riana)
>> - Change commit message. (Raag)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
>> index 579e87cb9ff7..0b87c8ed760d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
>> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ needed.
>>   Recovery
>>   --------
>>   
>> -Current implementation defines four recovery methods, out of which, drivers
>> +Current implementation defines several recovery methods, out of which, drivers
>>   can use any one, multiple or none. Method(s) of choice will be sent in the
>>   uevent environment as ``WEDGED=<method1>[,..,<methodN>]`` in order of less to
>>   more side-effects. See the section `Vendor Specific Recovery`_
>> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ following expectations.
>>       rebind          unbind + bind driver
>>       bus-reset       unbind + bus reset/re-enumeration + bind
>>       vendor-specific vendor specific recovery method
>> +    cold-reset      unbind + remove device + slot power cycle + rescan
> Do you need to unbind if you're already removing the device?
Yes, you are right, when we remove the device unbind is not required.
>
>>       unknown         consumer policy
>>       =============== ========================================
>>   
>> @@ -447,6 +448,14 @@ debug purpose in order to root cause the hang. This is useful because the first
>>   hang is usually the most critical one which can result in consequential hangs
>>   or complete wedging.
>>   
>> +Cold Reset Recovery
>> +-------------------
>> +
>> +When ``WEDGED=cold-reset`` is sent, it indicates a non-recoverable device error,
>> +only a full power cycle can restore the device.
> This was phrased much better in last rev, not sure why changed?
I'll revert it as per last rev.
>
>> +This method is used by devices that are plugged directly into the PCIe slot.
> ... which supports removing the power.
>
>>   Vendor Specific Recovery
>>   ------------------------
>>   
>> @@ -524,6 +533,55 @@ Recovery script::
>>       echo -n $DEVICE > $DRIVER/unbind
>>       echo -n $DEVICE > $DRIVER/bind
>>   
>> +Example - cold-reset
>> +--------------------
>> +
>> +Udev rule::
>> +
>> +    SUBSYSTEM=="drm", ENV{WEDGED}=="cold-reset", DEVPATH=="*/drm/card[0-9]",
>> +    RUN+="/path/to/cold-reset.sh $env{DEVPATH}"
>> +
>> +Recovery script::
>> +
>> +    #!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +    [ -z "$1" ] && echo "Usage: $0 <device-path>" && exit 1
>> +
>> +    # Get device
>> +    DEVPATH=$(readlink -f /sys/$1/device 2>/dev/null || readlink -f /sys/$1)
>> +    DEVICE=$(basename $DEVPATH)
>> +
>> +    echo "Cold reset: $DEVICE"
>> +
>> +    # Try slot power reset first
>> +    SLOT=$(find /sys/bus/pci/slots/ -type l 2>/dev/null | while read slot; do
>> +	    ADDR=$(cat "$slot" 2>/dev/null)
>> +	    [ -n "$ADDR" ] && echo "$DEVICE" | grep -q "^$ADDR" && basename $(dirname "$slot") && break
>> +    done)
> This looks like too much is happening here, can we try to simplify a bit?
Sure
>
>> +    if [ -n "$SLOT" ]; then
>> +	echo "Using slot $SLOT"
>> +
>> +	# Unbind driver
>> +	[ -e "/sys/bus/pci/devices/$DEVICE/driver" ] && \
>> +	echo "$DEVICE" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/$DEVICE/driver/unbind 2>/dev/null
> Is this really needed?

It's nor required. I'll remove those lines.

Thanks,

-/Mallesh

>
> Raag
>
>> +	# Remove device
>> +	echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/$DEVICE/remove
>> +
>> +	# Power cycle slot
>> +	echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/$SLOT/power
>> +	sleep 2
>> +	echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/$SLOT/power
>> +	sleep 1
>> +
>> +	# Rescan
>> +	echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
>> +	echo "Done!"
>> +    else
>> +	echo "No slot found"
>> +    fi
>> +
>>   Customization
>>   -------------
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-13 13:30 [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce cold reset recovery method Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-04-13 13:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Introduce Xe Uncorrectable Error Handling Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-04-13 13:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm: Add DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_COLD_RESET recovery method Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-04-21  8:19   ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-13 13:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/doc: Document " Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-04-21  8:30   ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-12  8:29     ` Mallesh, Koujalagi [this message]
2026-04-13 13:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe: Handle PUNIT errors by requesting cold-reset recovery Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-04-21  9:11   ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-13 17:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce cold reset recovery method (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-13 17:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-13 18:45 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-13 21:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4dc38cbc-0b9d-4615-94be-2f07667b8248@intel.com \
    --to=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox