Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:38:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f6f6607-bab2-46f4-b471-cb099eaaed24@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c0bfb21-ead6-472b-b68d-62eece414472@intel.com>



On 10-02-2025 23:26, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08-02-2025 03:49, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> xe_display_fini() undoes things from xe_display_init() (technically from
>> intel_display_driver_probe()). Those `goto err` in xe_device_probe()
>> were wrong and being accumulated over time.
>>
>> Commit 65e366ace5ee ("drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for
>> display") made it easier to fix now that we don't have xe_display_* init
>> calls spread on xe_device_probe(). Change xe_display_init() to use
>> devm_add_action_or_reset() that will finalize display in the right
>> order.
>>
>> While at it, also add a newline and comment about calling
>> xe_driver_flr_fini.
>>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h |  2 --
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 21 +++++++++++----------
>>   3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/ 
>> drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> index 651799c946ace..302f533af037d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>> @@ -161,27 +161,29 @@ int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>       return err;
>>   }
>> -int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +static void xe_display_fini(void *arg)
>>   {
>> +    struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>>       struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
>> -    if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>> -        return 0;
>> -
>> -    return intel_display_driver_probe(display);
>> +    intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
>> +    intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
>> +    intel_audio_deinit(display);
>>   }
>> -void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>>   {
>>       struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
>> +    int err;
>>       if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>> -        return;
>> +        return 0;
>> -    intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
>> +    err = intel_display_driver_probe(display);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        return err;
>> -    intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
>> -    intel_audio_deinit(display);
>> +    return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini, xe);
>>   }
>>   void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/ 
>> drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
>> index e2a99624f7064..685dc74402fb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>> -void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe);
>>   void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe);
>> @@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device 
>> *xe) { return 0; }
>>   static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) 
>> { return 0; }
>>   static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>> -static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>>   static inline void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>>   static inline void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/ 
>> xe_device.c
>> index 36d7ffb3b4d90..ac3e344fe04ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
>>               "Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to 
>> performance impact");
>>       xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -803,22 +804,26 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>       err = xe_devcoredump_init(xe);
>>       if (err)
>>           return err;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * From here on, if a step fails, make sure a Driver-FLR is 
>> triggereed
>> +     */
>>       err = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_driver_flr_fini, 
>> xe);
>>       if (err)
>>           return err;
>>       err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
>>       if (err)
>> -        goto err;
>> +        return err;
>>       err = xe_vram_probe(xe);
>>       if (err)
>> -        goto err;
>> +        return err;
>>       for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>           err = xe_tile_init_noalloc(tile);
>>           if (err)
>> -            goto err;
>> +            return err;
>>       }
>>       /* Allocate and map stolen after potential VRAM resize */
>> @@ -832,17 +837,17 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>        */
>>       err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
>>       if (err)
>> -        goto err;
>> +        return err;
> 
> Currently, xe_oa_fini and xe_heci_gsc_fini won't be called in case of an 
> error. This is incomplete without also moving xe_oa_fini and 
> xe_heci_gsc_fini under devm_add_action_or_reset.

xe_oa_fini is addressed in further patches and xe_heci_gsc_fini is 
already in cleanup path. With that patch LGTM

Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>

> 
> 
>>       for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>           err = xe_tile_init(tile);
>>           if (err)
>> -            goto err;
>> +            return err;
>>       }
>>       err = xe_irq_install(xe);
>>       if (err)
>> -        goto err;
>> +        return err;
>>       for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
>>           last_gt = id;
>> @@ -902,8 +907,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>               break;
>>       }
>> -err:
>> -    xe_display_fini(xe);
>>       return err;
>>   }
>> @@ -924,8 +927,6 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
>>       xe_device_remove_display(xe);
>> -    xe_display_fini(xe);
>> -
>>       xe_oa_fini(xe);
>>       xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 22:19 [PATCH v3 00/13] Cleanup error handling on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 17:56   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-10 19:08     ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/xe: Fix error handling in xe_irq_install() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 17:58   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/xe: Fix xe_tile_init_noalloc() error propagation Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10  5:52   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-10 17:59   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 18:05   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/xe: Remove leftover pxp comment Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/xe: Add callback support for driver remove Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 17:41   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-12  5:45     ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/xe: Cleanup unwind of gt initialization Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 18:54   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/xe: Cleanup extra calls to xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 18:56   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/xe/oa: Move fini to xe_oa Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/xe: Move drm_dev_unplug() out of display function Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10  5:44   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/xe/oa: Handle errors in xe_oa_register() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/xe/pmu: Fail probe if xe_pmu_register() fails Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 11:17   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-10 19:00   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Stop ignoring errors on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 22:31   ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-10  5:31   ` Nilawar, Badal
2025-02-10 15:15     ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 16:54       ` Nilawar, Badal
2025-02-07 23:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup error handling on probe (rev3) Patchwork
2025-02-07 23:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-07 23:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-08  0:00 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-08  0:02 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-08  0:03 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-10  6:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-10  6:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f6f6607-bab2-46f4-b471-cb099eaaed24@intel.com \
    --to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox