From: Julia Filipchuk <julia.filipchuk@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Vinay Belgaumkar" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
"Stuart Summers" <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Extend Wa_13011645652 to PTL-H, WCL
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:29:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52d8cd5a-a3bc-4ffe-84c6-4facda290cdf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cc4dece-7bdb-4fdf-a126-d9e311ca74e6@intel.com>
On 9/3/2025 1:28 PM, John Harrison wrote:
> Does this count as a fix? If we are just extending a workaround to apply to more
> platforms, that is not a bug fix of the workaround. It is more of a new platform
> enabling patch. Indeed, if you send this patch as a backported fix to older
> kernels, those older trees might not support the new platform. Which is
> therefore unnecessary backport work and extra confusion because the tree is now
> claiming to support a platform which it actually does not.
Possibly not. Just intending to send this to the current mainline 6.17 with
backport not necessary. The workaround would still apply if ever loaded with
older kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 18:15 [PATCH] drm/xe: Expand workaround 13011645652 to PTL, WCL Julia Filipchuk
2025-09-03 18:23 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-09-03 18:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-03 18:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-03 19:00 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Extend Wa_13011645652 to PTL-H, WCL Julia Filipchuk
2025-09-03 20:28 ` John Harrison
2025-09-03 21:29 ` Julia Filipchuk [this message]
2025-09-03 21:51 ` Matt Atwood
2025-09-03 21:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-09-03 19:08 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Expand workaround 13011645652 to PTL, WCL (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-03 19:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-03 23:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for drm/xe: Expand workaround 13011645652 to PTL, WCL Patchwork
2025-09-04 1:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/xe: Expand workaround 13011645652 to PTL, WCL (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52d8cd5a-a3bc-4ffe-84c6-4facda290cdf@intel.com \
--to=julia.filipchuk@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox