From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate BO
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:28:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b6e3ecb-046a-4cab-a0c8-a0fc4bdf436a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730004735.344627-2-jia.yao@intel.com>
On 30/07/2026 01:47, Jia Yao wrote:
> xe_guc_ads_populate() calls xe_map_memset() on the ADS BO on every GT
> reset. The UM queue ring buffers were embedded in that same BO, so the
> memset discards fault descriptors already written by the GPU, causing
> GuC to forward an all-zero descriptor (Faulted Address = 0, ASID = 0).
>
> Move the UM queue ring buffers into a dedicated BO so they are not
> affected by the ADS memset.
>
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 6 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h | 5 ++
> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 4023700ff2a9..21cf3edef922 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ static int xe_guc_realloc_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (guc->ads.um_queue_bo) {
> + ret = xe_managed_bo_reinit_in_vram(xe, tile, &guc->ads.um_queue_bo);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> index c98454545a85..7f371f9c7268 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> #include "regs/xe_guc_regs.h"
> #include "xe_bo.h"
> +#include "xe_res_cursor.h"
> #include "xe_gt.h"
> #include "xe_gt_ccs_mode.h"
> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
> @@ -155,16 +156,6 @@ static size_t guc_ads_capture_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> return PAGE_ALIGN(ads->capture_size);
> }
>
> -static size_t guc_ads_um_queues_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = ads_to_xe(ads);
> -
> - if (!xe->info.has_usm)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE * GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX;
> -}
> -
> static size_t guc_ads_private_data_size(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> return PAGE_ALIGN(ads_to_guc(ads)->fw.private_data_size);
> @@ -205,22 +196,12 @@ static size_t guc_ads_capture_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> }
>
> -static size_t guc_ads_um_queues_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> -{
> - u32 offset;
> -
> - offset = guc_ads_capture_offset(ads) +
> - guc_ads_capture_size(ads);
> -
> - return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> -}
> -
> static size_t guc_ads_private_data_offset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> size_t offset;
>
> - offset = guc_ads_um_queues_offset(ads) +
> - guc_ads_um_queues_size(ads);
> + offset = guc_ads_capture_offset(ads) +
> + guc_ads_capture_size(ads);
>
> return PAGE_ALIGN(offset);
> }
> @@ -409,6 +390,67 @@ int xe_guc_ads_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> ads->bo = bo;
>
> + if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> + /*
> + * Allocate a separate BO for the HW fault ring (UM queues).
> + *
> + * xe_guc_ads_populate() clears the entire ADS BO via
> + * xe_map_memset() on every GT reset. Keeping the UM queues
> + * in a dedicated BO prevents that memset from discarding fault
> + * descriptors the GPU has already written into the ring,
> + * which would cause GuC to forward an all-zero descriptor to
> + * the driver (Faulted Address = 0, ASID = 0).
> + *
> + * Round the size up to the next power of two so that on iGPU
> + * (system memory, no IOMMU) the TTM pool issues a single
> + * alloc_pages(order=N) call, maximising the chance of getting
> + * a physically contiguous block. GuC requires contiguous DPA.
> + */
From our offline discussion I think is this is correct, however there
is no mention of this fix/change in the commit message? It only mentions
memset issue.
> + size_t um_size = roundup_pow_of_two(GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE *
> + GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX);
> +
> + bo = xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, um_size,
> + XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT_INVALIDATE |
> + XE_BO_FLAG_PINNED_NORESTORE);
> + if (IS_ERR(bo))
> + return PTR_ERR(bo);
> +
> + /*
> + * On pre-Xe3p platforms, GAM (not GuC) accesses the UM queue
> + * ring via base_dpa, which must be a contiguous device physical
> + * address range. Without IOMMU, DMA addresses equal physical
> + * addresses and the allocator may return non-contiguous pages;
> + * verify contiguity. With IOMMU, the DMA mapping is a single
> + * contiguous IOVA so no check is needed.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!device_iommu_mapped(xe->drm.dev)) &&
I think maybe drop the iommu check? Not sure if we can safely assume it
will always give single contig dma blob.
> + !xe_bo_is_vram(bo) &&
> + !xe_guc_using_main_gamctrl_queues(ads_to_guc(ads))) {
> + struct xe_res_cursor cur;
> + int i;
> +
> + xe_res_first_sg(xe_bo_sg(bo), 0,
> + GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE * GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX, &cur);
> + for (i = 1; i < GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
> + dma_addr_t expected = xe_res_dma(&cur) +
> + GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE;
I think we can maybe simplify with:
if (drm_prime_get_contiguous_size(xe_bo_sg(bo)) < queue size)
...
> +
> + xe_res_next(&cur, GUC_UM_QUEUE_SIZE);
> + if (xe_res_dma(&cur) != expected) {
> + drm_err(&xe->drm,
> + "UM fault queue %d is physically non-contiguous (got %pad, expected %pad); GAM requires contiguous DPA. Enable IOMMU (intel_iommu=on) to fix.\n",
> + i, &(dma_addr_t){xe_res_dma(&cur)},
> + &expected);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ads->um_queue_bo = bo;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
> ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(xe_guc_ads_init, ERRNO); /* See xe_pci_probe() */
> @@ -820,7 +862,7 @@ static void guc_mmio_reg_state_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> static void guc_um_init_params(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> {
> - u32 um_queue_offset = guc_ads_um_queues_offset(ads);
> + struct xe_bo *um_bo = ads->um_queue_bo;
> struct xe_guc *guc = ads_to_guc(ads);
> struct xe_device *xe = ads_to_xe(ads);
> u64 base_dpa;
> @@ -830,8 +872,14 @@ static void guc_um_init_params(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>
> with_dpa = !xe_guc_using_main_gamctrl_queues(guc);
>
> - base_ggtt = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(ads->bo) + um_queue_offset;
> - base_dpa = xe_bo_main_addr(ads->bo, PAGE_SIZE) + um_queue_offset;
> + if (um_bo) {
> + /* All USM platforms: UM queues in dedicated um_queue_bo */
> + base_ggtt = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(um_bo);
> + base_dpa = xe_bo_main_addr(um_bo, PAGE_SIZE);
> + } else {
> + /* Platform does not support USM: no UM queues, nothing to do */
> + return;
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < GUC_UM_HW_QUEUE_MAX; ++i) {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> index 48a8e092023f..845c1fbd93a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads_types.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ struct xe_bo;
> struct xe_guc_ads {
> /** @bo: Xe BO for GuC ads blob */
> struct xe_bo *bo;
> + /**
> + * @um_queue_bo: Dedicated BO for the HW fault ring (UM queues).
> + * NULL if the platform does not support USM.
> + */
> + struct xe_bo *um_queue_bo;
> /** @golden_lrc_size: golden LRC size */
> size_t golden_lrc_size;
> /** @regset_size: size of register set passed to GuC for save/restore */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 5:34 [PATCH v3 0/1] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate UC BO Jia Yao
2026-07-22 5:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Jia Yao
2026-07-22 9:18 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-22 23:00 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2026-07-22 5:41 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-07-22 5:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-22 6:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-22 20:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-07-30 0:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] " Jia Yao
2026-07-30 0:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in a separate BO Jia Yao
2026-07-30 10:28 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-07-30 0:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: allocate UM queues in VRAM on dGFX Jia Yao
2026-07-30 10:51 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-30 13:12 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-30 0:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe/guc_ads: use uncached mapping for UM queue BO Jia Yao
2026-07-30 9:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 11:23 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b6e3ecb-046a-4cab-a0c8-a0fc4bdf436a@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jia.yao@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox