From: "Pottumuttu, Sai Teja" <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/xe2: Add performance tuning for L3 cache flushing
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:09:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65167663-8d0e-4b6a-94c9-5480fb400761@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240918204830.49880-4-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On 19-09-2024 02:17, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> A recommended performance tuning for LNL related to L3 cache flushing
> was recently introduced in Bspec. Implement it.
>
> Bspec: 70821
The correct BSpec should be 72161 I guess.
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index 6ec2d2c11d77..ccd18cdd5b50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,9 @@
> #define L3SQCREG3 XE_REG_MCR(0xb108)
> #define COMPPWOVERFETCHEN REG_BIT(28)
>
> +#define SCRATCH3LBCF XE_REG_MCR(0xb154)
> +#define RWFLUSHALLEN REG_BIT(17)
> +
> #define XEHP_L3SQCREG5 XE_REG_MCR(0xb158)
> #define L3_PWM_TIMER_INIT_VAL_MASK REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
>
> @@ -406,6 +409,8 @@
>
> #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG3 XE_REG_MCR(0xb608)
>
> +#define XE2LPM_SCRATCH3LBCF XE_REG_MCR(0xb654)
Just a general question, the register might exist on other platforms as
well right, so,
would it be a good idea to call it SCRATCH3LBCF_MEDIA instead?
> +
> #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG5 XE_REG_MCR(0xb658)
>
> #define XE2_TDF_CTRL XE_REG(0xb418)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> index f62622f0be85..4dd77b44ac82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ static const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr gt_tunings[] = {
> XE_RTP_ACTIONS(FIELD_SET(XELPMP_STATELESS_COMPRESSION_CTRL, UNIFIED_COMPRESSION_FORMAT,
> REG_FIELD_PREP(UNIFIED_COMPRESSION_FORMAT, 0)))
> },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("Tuning: L3 RW flush all Cache"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(2004, XE_RTP_END_VERSION_UNDEFINED)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(SCRATCH3, RWFLUSHALLEN))
The register should be SCRATCH3LBCF
Thank You
- Sai Teja
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("Tuning: L3 RW flush all cache - media"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(MEDIA_VERSION_RANGE(2000, XE_RTP_END_VERSION_UNDEFINED)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(XE2LPM_SCRATCH3LBCF, RWFLUSHALLEN))
> + },
> {}
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-18 20:47 [PATCH 0/3] Xe2 performance tuning updates Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/xe2: Extend performance tuning to media GT Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-19 8:00 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-09-19 18:08 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 5:42 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-09-18 20:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/xe2: Assume tuning settings also apply for future " Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-19 8:01 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-09-18 20:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/xe2: Add performance tuning for L3 cache flushing Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-19 7:39 ` Pottumuttu, Sai Teja [this message]
2024-09-19 18:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-19 8:22 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-09-19 19:24 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-19 19:36 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 5:17 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-09-20 11:53 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 23:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Xe2 performance tuning updates Patchwork
2024-09-18 23:51 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 23:51 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65167663-8d0e-4b6a-94c9-5480fb400761@intel.com \
--to=sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox