From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 22:48:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177520867238.430832.13504999596712780226@a3b018990fe9>
On 4/3/2026 11:31 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b_FULL -> xe-pw-164119v2_FULL
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-164119v2_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
> Participating hosts (2 -> 2)
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset:
> o shard-bmg: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> -> DMESG-WARN <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> +2 other tests dmesg-warn
<3> [159.952583] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: G2H channel broken on read, type=3, reset required
<3> [160.155952] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: CT dequeue failed: -95
not directly related to this series, just exposes a gap in our CTB implementation
should be fixed by https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164357/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 19:17 [PATCH v2 00/13] drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/xe/guc: Update POLICY_SCHED_IF_IDLE documentation Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/xe/pf: Fix pf_get_sched_priority() function signature Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/xe/pf: Force new VFs prorities only once Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/xe/pf: Print applied policy KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision policy settings after GT reset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/xe/pf: Don't reprovision policies if already default Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/xe/pf: Encode scheduling priority KLV if needed Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/xe/pf: Check EQ/PT/PRIO when testing VF config Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/xe/pf: Allow to change sched_if_idle policy under lock Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision scheduling to default when no VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helper to show which VFs are provisioned Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helpers for bulk EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/xe/pf: Perform fair scheduling auto-provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-03 11:37 ` Michał Winiarski
2026-04-02 19:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-02 20:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-03 9:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-03 20:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-04-11 15:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-11 16:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-11 18:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox