public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 22:48:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177520867238.430832.13504999596712780226@a3b018990fe9>



On 4/3/2026 11:31 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:*	drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2)
> *URL:*	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164119/>
> *State:*	failure
> *Details:*	https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/index.html>
> 
> 
>   CI Bug Log - changes from xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b_FULL -> xe-pw-164119v2_FULL
> 
> 
>     Summary
> 
> *FAILURE*
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-164119v2_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> 
>     Participating hosts (2 -> 2)
> 
> No changes in participating hosts
> 
> 
>     Possible new issues
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-164119v2_FULL:
> 
> 
>       IGT changes
> 
> 
>         Possible regressions
> 
>   * igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset:
>       o shard-bmg: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-4843-dba2251b00d3faac3be7fc15431ffb9c4d60232b/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> -> DMESG-WARN <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-164119v2/shard-bmg-9/igt@xe_exec_reset@gt-reset.html> +2 other tests dmesg-warn

<3> [159.952583] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: G2H channel broken on read, type=3, reset required
<3> [160.155952] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Tile0: GT1: CT dequeue failed: -95

not directly related to this series, just exposes a gap in our CTB implementation
should be fixed by https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164357/



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 19:17 [PATCH v2 00/13] drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/xe/guc: Update POLICY_SCHED_IF_IDLE documentation Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/xe/pf: Fix pf_get_sched_priority() function signature Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/xe/pf: Force new VFs prorities only once Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/xe/pf: Print applied policy KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision policy settings after GT reset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/xe/pf: Don't reprovision policies if already default Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/xe/pf: Encode scheduling priority KLV if needed Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/xe/pf: Check EQ/PT/PRIO when testing VF config Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/xe/pf: Allow to change sched_if_idle policy under lock Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/xe/pf: Reprovision scheduling to default when no VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helper to show which VFs are provisioned Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/xe/pf: Extract helpers for bulk EQ/PT provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-02 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/xe/pf: Perform fair scheduling auto-provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-03 11:37   ` Michał Winiarski
2026-04-02 19:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-02 20:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-03  9:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-03 20:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-04-11 15:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pf: Improve EQ/PT provisioning (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-11 16:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-11 18:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65f02bfc-6afd-4ce7-843d-15cfcd2edc94@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox