From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
matthew.brost@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/gem: add helper to detect self-imported PRIME dma-bufs
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:46:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <660f7cf6-fd37-4c91-b802-767a11a8dc7a@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atHDszh1A9Eqsukh@nvishwa1-desk>
Hi
Am 16.10.26 um 08:26 schrieb Niranjana Vishwanathapura:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 09:27:08AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 14.10.26 um 21:02 schrieb Niranjana Vishwanathapura:
>>> From: Farah Kassabri <farah.kassabri@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Add drm_gem_prime_self_import() to detect and handle the case where a
>>> PRIME dma-buf being imported was exported by the same DRM device.
>>>
>>> When the dma-buf originates from the importing device and uses the
>>> expected dma-buf ops, the helper returns the associated GEM object and
>>> takes an extra reference on it. This allows drivers to bypass the
>>> generic PRIME import path and avoid taking an additional reference on
>>> the dma-buf file.
>>>
>>> The helper simplifies self-import handling and avoids duplication of
>>> this pattern across DRM drivers.
>>>
>>> v2: Move drm_gem_prime_self_import() to drm_gem.h as a static inline
>>> helper routine
>>
>> Why even bother submitting this? It is the same series that I already
>> declined with a few cosmetic changes.
>>
>> The abstract entry point for importing is
>> drm_driver.gem_prime_import. The implementation is driver specific.
>> No need to over abstract. Keeping drm_gem_object_get() separate from
>> the test is a feature, not a bug BTW.
>>
>> If you want to improve the status quo, change dma-buf such that prime
>> works without relying on the vtable and ->priv. I outlined this in my
>> earlier replies.
>>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> As mentioned in other thread, your earlier suggesion of
> '__drm_gem_is_exported_dma_buf(dev, ops, dma_buf)' is not fully helpful
> as it would require drivers to still take object reference. Besides,
> this also depends on 'ops'.
This is a feature. These are two distinct operations. Taking the object
ref is another of those implementation detail where drivers might want
to do something else.
>
> To me the 'dma_buf_ops as export identifer' seems to be well accepted
> idiom, though we may say it shouldn't be in stricter sense.
>
> But if we were not to relay on vtable and ->priv, then it looks like
> the best alternative will be to have DRM subsystem maintain a list of
> exported dma-buf objects per drm device. Then during import, parse this
> list to determine if the import is self-import or not.
>
> I am not sure if it is worth to add this list just for this simple helper
> routine. If using dma_buf ops is no go, then yah, let us drop this
> series,
> keep current code and may be look into this alternative later through
> an RFC.
As I mention before, the abstraction is drm_driver.gem_prime_import.
Anything behind that is driver-specific. A real improvement should
provide a driver-generic implementation of gem_prime_import. This needs
changes to dma_buf and to the prime helpers. OTOH gem_prime_import is
already fairly abstract. There are no low-hanging fruits here IMHO.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Thanks,
> Niranjana
>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Farah Kassabri <farah.kassabri@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura
>>> <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 10 ++-------
>>> include/drm/drm_gem.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
>>> index 9b44c78cd77f..7a15c29052eb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
>>> @@ -974,15 +974,9 @@ struct drm_gem_object
>>> *drm_gem_prime_import_dev(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
>>> int ret;
>>> - if (drm_gem_is_prime_exported_dma_buf(dev, dma_buf)) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * Importing dmabuf exported from our own gem increases
>>> - * refcount on gem itself instead of f_count of dmabuf.
>>> - */
>>> - obj = dma_buf->priv;
>>> - drm_gem_object_get(obj);
>>> + obj = drm_gem_prime_self_import(dev, dma_buf,
>>> &drm_gem_prime_dmabuf_ops);
>>> + if (obj)
>>> return obj;
>>> - }
>>> if (!dev->driver->gem_prime_import_sg_table)
>>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>>> index 885244e375d3..238ec08f0d81 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>>> @@ -646,6 +646,48 @@ static inline bool drm_gem_is_imported(const
>>> struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>>> return !!obj->import_attach;
>>> }
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_gem_prime_self_import - Attempt to import a dma-buf exported
>>> by this DRM device
>>> + * @dev: DRM device performing the import
>>> + * @dma_buf: dma-buf to import
>>> + * @expected_ops: dma-buf ops used by this driver
>>> + *
>>> + * If @dma_buf was exported by this DRM device using @expected_ops,
>>> return the
>>> + * corresponding GEM object and take an extra reference on it. In
>>> this case,
>>> + * the import avoids taking a reference on the dma-buf file and
>>> instead bumps
>>> + * the GEM object's refcount directly.
>>> + *
>>> + * Comparing @dma_buf->ops against @expected_ops is plumbing:
>>> dma-buf has no
>>> + * first-class exporter identifier, so the ops pointer is used as a
>>> stand-in to
>>> + * recognise a buffer this driver exported. A dedicated exporter
>>> identity would
>>> + * let this be done without reaching into @dma_buf->ops.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * A referenced GEM object on success, or %NULL if the dma-buf was
>>> not exported
>>> + * by this device or does not match @expected_ops.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline struct drm_gem_object *
>>> +drm_gem_prime_self_import(struct drm_device *dev, struct dma_buf
>>> *dma_buf,
>>> + const struct dma_buf_ops *expected_ops)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_gem_object *obj;
>>> +
>>> + if (dma_buf->ops != expected_ops)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + obj = dma_buf->priv;
>>> + if (obj->dev != dev)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Importing dmabuf exported from the driver's own gem increases
>>> + * refcount on gem itself instead of f_count of dmabuf.
>>> + */
>>> + drm_gem_object_get(obj);
>>> +
>>> + return obj;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
>>> #define drm_gem_gpuva_assert_lock_held(gpuvm, obj) \
>>> lockdep_assert(drm_gpuvm_immediate_mode(gpuvm) ? \
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thomas Zimmermann
>> Graphics Driver Developer
>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>> Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
>> GF: Stefan Gaiser, Jochen Jaser, Abhinav Puri, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>>
>>
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
GF: Stefan Gaiser, Jochen Jaser, Abhinav Puri, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 19:02 [PATCH v3 0/6] drm: consolidate self-imported PRIME dma-buf detection Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/gem: add helper to detect self-imported PRIME dma-bufs Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-15 7:27 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-10-16 6:26 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-16 7:46 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2026-10-18 20:25 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/xe/dma-buf: Use drm helper to detect dma-buf self-import Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/gem: add drm_gem_prime_dma_buf_to_gem() self-import helper Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/panthor: use drm_gem_prime_self_import() helper Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/panfrost: " Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-10-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/amdgpu: " Niranjana Vishwanathapura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=660f7cf6-fd37-4c91-b802-767a11a8dc7a@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox