From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe/gt: Add engine masks for each class
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 16:35:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e3d1cb6-af91-48ed-9a48-4d3c232f6386@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251206230356.3600292-14-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On 12/7/2025 12:03 AM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> Follow up patches will need the engine masks for VCS and VECS engines.
> Since we already have a macro for the CCS engines, just extend the same
> approach to all classes.
>
> To avoid confusion with the XE_HW_ENGINE_*_MASK masks, the new macros
> use the _INSTANCES suffix instead. For consistency, rename CCS_MASK to
> CCS_INSTANCES as well.
>
> v2: Use _INSTANCES suffix (Michal)
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h | 9 ++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> index 94969ddd9d88..2eeeeeb6b912 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,14 @@
> for_each_if(((hwe__) = (gt__)->hw_engines + (id__)) && \
> xe_hw_engine_is_valid((hwe__)))
>
> -#define CCS_MASK(gt) (((gt)->info.engine_mask & XE_HW_ENGINE_CCS_MASK) >> XE_HW_ENGINE_CCS0)
> +#define __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, name) \
nit: this MASK suffix here still suggests it returns some kind of mask
if you still want to have MASK tag here, then maybe name macro as:
#define XE_ENGINE_MASK_TO_INSTANCES(gt, ENGINE)
or
#define XE_ENGINE_INSTANCES_FROM_MASK(gt, ENGINE)
but final macros look fine, so with improved name of helper macro,
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> + (((gt)->info.engine_mask & XE_HW_ENGINE_##name##_MASK) >> XE_HW_ENGINE_##name##0)
> +
> +#define RCS_INSTANCES(gt) __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, RCS)
> +#define VCS_INSTANCES(gt) __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, VCS)
> +#define VECS_INSTANCES(gt) __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, VECS)
> +#define CCS_INSTANCES(gt) __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, CCS)
> +#define GSCCS_INSTANCES(gt) __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, GSCCS)
>
> #define GT_VER(gt) ({ \
> typeof(gt) gt_ = (gt); \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> index 50fffc9ebf62..91ac22ef5703 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
> {
> u32 mode = CCS_MODE_CSLICE_0_3_MASK; /* disable all by default */
> - int num_slices = hweight32(CCS_MASK(gt));
> + int num_slices = hweight32(CCS_INSTANCES(gt));
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> int width, cslice = 0;
> u32 config = 0;
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
> config |= BIT(hwe->instance) << XE_HW_ENGINE_CCS0;
>
> /* If a slice is fused off, leave disabled */
> - while ((CCS_MASK(gt) & BIT(cslice)) == 0)
> + while ((CCS_INSTANCES(gt) & BIT(cslice)) == 0)
> cslice++;
>
> mode &= ~CCS_MODE_CSLICE(cslice, CCS_MODE_CSLICE_MASK);
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ num_cslices_show(struct device *kdev,
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = kobj_to_gt(&kdev->kobj);
>
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", hweight32(CCS_MASK(gt)));
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", hweight32(CCS_INSTANCES(gt)));
> }
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(num_cslices);
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> * Ensure number of engines specified is valid and there is an
> * exact multiple of engines for slices.
> */
> - num_slices = hweight32(CCS_MASK(gt));
> + num_slices = hweight32(CCS_INSTANCES(gt));
> if (!num_engines || num_engines > num_slices || num_slices % num_engines) {
> xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Invalid compute config, %d engines %d slices\n",
> num_engines, num_slices);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
> index f8779852cf0d..ef3b853f5c8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int xe_gt_ccs_mode_sysfs_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
> static inline bool xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(const struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> /* Check if there are more than one compute engines available */
> - return hweight32(CCS_MASK(gt)) > 1;
> + return hweight32(CCS_INSTANCES(gt)) > 1;
> }
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 88376bc2a483..ccc914563ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static bool needs_wa_dual_queue(struct xe_gt *gt)
> * the DUAL_QUEUE_WA on all newer platforms on GTs that have CCS engines
> * to move management back to the GuC.
> */
> - if (CCS_MASK(gt) && GRAPHICS_VERx100(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 1270)
> + if (CCS_INSTANCES(gt) && GRAPHICS_VERx100(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 1270)
> return true;
>
> return false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 3ca2558c8c96..af43acf7baae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int guc_init_global_schedule_policy(struct xe_guc *guc)
>
> *emit++ = XE_GUC_ACTION_UPDATE_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_KLV;
>
> - if (CCS_MASK(guc_to_gt(guc)))
> + if (CCS_INSTANCES(guc_to_gt(guc)))
> emit = emit_render_compute_yield_klv(emit);
>
> count = emit - data;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-07 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-06 23:03 [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce SRIOV scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe/gt: Add engine masks for each class Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-07 15:35 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-12-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/xe/sriov: Initialize scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-07 21:57 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-08 17:36 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add support for enabling " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-07 21:57 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-08 17:41 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/xe/sriov: Scheduler groups are incompatible with multi-lrc Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-07 21:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-08 17:48 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add handling for MLRC adverse event threshold Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-07 22:03 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-08 17:52 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-08 18:27 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs to enable scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-08 23:38 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-09 0:36 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-09 15:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-09 18:09 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs with scheduler groups information Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-09 0:08 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-09 0:23 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/xe/sriov: Prep for multiple exec quantums and preemption timeouts Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add functions to set exec quantums for each group Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add functions to set preempt timeouts " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/xe/sriov: Add debugfs to set EQ and PT for scheduler groups Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-06 23:10 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce SRIOV scheduler groups (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-06 23:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e3d1cb6-af91-48ed-9a48-4d3c232f6386@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox