From: "Teres Alexis, Alan Previn" <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
To: "Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 4/6] drm/xe/guc: Extract GuC error capture lists
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:57:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ebbd8a703734f51a39e4dcba6dd33997d8b9e6c.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003151626.2901703-5-zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
I've reviewed the delta from my last rb on this patch and only found a minor nit which you can choose to ignore.
Thus:
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
thanks.
On Thu, 2024-10-03 at 08:16 -0700, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
> Upon the G2H Notify-Err-Capture event, parse through the
> GuC Log Buffer (error-capture-subregion) and generate one or
> more capture-nodes. A single node represents a single "engine-
> instance-capture-dump" and contains at least 3 register lists:
> global, engine-class and engine-instance. An internal link
> list is maintained to store one or more nodes.
alan:snip
> +struct __guc_capture_parsed_output {
> + /*
> + * A single set of 3 capture lists: a global-list
> + * an engine-class-list and an engine-instance list.
> + * outlist in __guc_capture_parsed_output will keep
> + * a linked list of these nodes that will eventually
> + * be detached from outlist and attached into to
> + * xe_codedump in response to a context reset
> + */
> + struct list_head link;
> + bool is_partial;
> + u32 eng_class;
> + u32 eng_inst;
> + u32 guc_id;
> + u32 lrca;
> + struct gcap_reg_list_info {
> + u32 vfid;
> + u32 num_regs;
> + struct guc_mmio_reg *regs;
> + } reginfo[GUC_STATE_CAPTURE_TYPE_MAX];
> +#define GCAP_PARSED_REGLIST_INDEX_GLOBAL BIT(GUC_STATE_CAPTURE_TYPE_GLOBAL)
> +#define GCAP_PARSED_REGLIST_INDEX_ENGCLASS BIT(GUC_STATE_CAPTURE_TYPE_ENGINE_CLASS)
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Define all device tables of GuC error capture register lists
> * NOTE:
> @@ -221,6 +267,12 @@ struct xe_guc_state_capture {
> [GUC_STATE_CAPTURE_TYPE_MAX]
> [GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_CLASS_MAX];
> void *ads_null_cache;
> + struct list_head cachelist;
> +#define PREALLOC_NODES_MAX_COUNT (3 * GUC_MAX_ENGINE_CLASSES * GUC_MAX_INSTANCES_PER_CLASS)
> +#define PREALLOC_NODES_DEFAULT_NUMREGS 64
> +
> + int max_mmio_per_node;
> + struct list_head outlist;
> };
>
> static const struct __guc_mmio_reg_descr_group *
> @@ -451,7 +503,10 @@ guc_cap_list_num_regs(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 owner, u32 type,
> num_regs += match->num_regs;
> else
> /* Estimate steering register size for rcs/ccs */
alan: nit: maybe more clarity in the comment is required here else one might be
wondering why we are still providing a number when extlists returned null.
Please correct me if im wrong, but i assume it might read something like:
"if a caller wants the full register dump size but we have not yet got the hw-config,
which is before max_mmio_per_node is uninitialized, then provide a worst-case number
for extlists based on max dss fuse bits, but only ever for render/compute"
> - if (capture_class == GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_CLASS_RENDER_COMPUTE)
> + if (owner == GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_INDEX_PF &&
> + type == GUC_STATE_CAPTURE_TYPE_ENGINE_CLASS &&
> + capture_class == GUC_CAPTURE_LIST_CLASS_RENDER_COMPUTE &&
> + !guc->capture->max_mmio_per_node)
> num_regs += guc_capture_get_steer_reg_num(guc_to_xe(guc)) *
> XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS;
>
alan:snip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 15:16 [PATCH v26 0/6] drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 1/6] drm/xe/guc: Prepare GuC register list and update ADS size " Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 2/6] drm/xe/guc: Add XE_LP steered register lists Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 3/6] drm/xe/guc: Add capture size check in GuC log buffer Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 4/6] drm/xe/guc: Extract GuC error capture lists Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 20:57 ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn [this message]
2024-10-04 2:21 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 5/6] drm/xe/guc: Plumb GuC-capture into dev coredump Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v26 6/6] drm/xe/guc: Save manual engine capture into capture list Zhanjun Dong
2024-10-03 16:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture (rev26) Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:09 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:24 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:26 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:50 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 18:34 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ebbd8a703734f51a39e4dcba6dd33997d8b9e6c.camel@intel.com \
--to=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox