From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] ULLS for kernel submission of migration jobs
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f07724535d0860e696d25ff6c8132170c6d53ba.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812024717.3584636-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi, Matt,
On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 19:47 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Ultra low latency for kernel submission of migration jobs.
>
> The basic idea is that faults (CPU or GPU) typically depend on
> migration
> jobs. Faults should be addressed as quickly as possible, but context
> switches via GuC on hardware are slow. To avoid context switches,
> perform ULLS in the kernel for migration jobs on discrete faulting
> devices with an LR VM open.
>
> This is implemented by switching the migration layer to ULLS mode
> upon
> opening an LR VM. In ULLS mode, migration jobs have a preamble and
> postamble: the preamble clears the current semaphore value, and the
> postamble waits for the next semaphore value. Each job submission
> sets
> the current semaphore in memory, bypassing the GuC. The net effect is
> that the migration execution queue never gets switched off the
> hardware
> while an LR VM is open.
>
> There may be concerns regarding power management, as the ring program
> continuously runs on a copy engine, and a force wake reference to a
> copy
> engine is held with an LR VM open.
>
> The implementation has been lightly tested but seems to be working.
>
> This approach will likely be put on hold until SVM is operational
> with
> benchmarks, but it is being posted early for feedback and as a public
> checkpoint.
>
> Matt
The main concern I have with this is that, at least according to
upstream discussions, pagefaults are so slow anyway, a performant stack
needs to try extremely hard to avoid them using manual prefaults, and
if we hit a gpu pagefault, we've lost anyway and any migration latency
optimization won't matter much.
Also, for power management, LR VM open is a very simple strategy, which
is good, but shouldn't it be possible to hook that up to LR job
running, similar to vm->preempt.rebind_deactivated?
/Thomas
>
> Matthew Brost (8):
> drm/xe: Add xe_hw_engine_write_ring_tail
> drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC
> drm/xe: Add ULLS flags for jobs
> drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer
> drm/xe: Add MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT instruction defs
> drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops
> drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission
> drm/xe: Enable ULLS migration jobs when opening LR VM
>
> .../gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h | 6 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 26 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c | 10 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 49 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc_types.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 130
> +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 32 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 10 ++
> 12 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 2:47 [RFC PATCH 0/8] ULLS for kernel submission of migration jobs Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] drm/xe: Add xe_hw_engine_write_ring_tail Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] drm/xe: Add ULLS flags for jobs Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] drm/xe: Add MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT instruction defs Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] drm/xe: Enable ULLS migration jobs when opening LR VM Matthew Brost
2024-08-12 2:51 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for ULLS for kernel submission of migration jobs Patchwork
2024-08-12 2:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-12 2:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-08-12 3:05 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-12 3:07 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-12 3:08 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-12 3:28 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-12 4:31 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-12 8:53 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2024-08-12 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] " Matthew Brost
2024-09-16 13:55 ` Matthew Brost
2024-09-17 6:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-09-17 14:39 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f07724535d0860e696d25ff6c8132170c6d53ba.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox