From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Limit max link bpp properly to a fractional value on SST
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 18:04:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <707ea5e3-2376-4a85-97d4-cd16e436889d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428133135.3396080-8-imre.deak@intel.com>
On 4/28/2025 7:01 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> The maximum link bpp - determined by the link BW for instance - can be
> fractional, handle this properly during computing the link bpp on SST.
>
> This keeps the pipe joiner specific maximum link bpp as a rounded-down
> integer value still, changing that to a fractional value is left for
> later.
>
> v2: Align the min/max bpp value to the bpp step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 42b45598a0134..7abc5286f4ccc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <linux/math.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/seq_buf.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -938,6 +940,7 @@ static u32 ultrajoiner_ram_max_bpp(u32 mode_hdisplay)
> return ultrajoiner_ram_bits() / mode_hdisplay;
> }
>
> +/* TODO: return a bpp_x16 value */
Makes sense, I can take this up later.
Patch LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> static
> u32 get_max_compressed_bpp_with_joiner(struct intel_display *display,
> u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
> @@ -2152,24 +2155,16 @@ static int dsc_compute_compressed_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct intel_connector *connector = to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> int output_bpp;
> - int dsc_min_bpp;
> - int dsc_max_bpp;
> int min_bpp_x16, max_bpp_x16, bpp_step_x16;
> int dsc_joiner_max_bpp;
> int num_joined_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(pipe_config);
> int bpp_x16;
> int ret;
>
> - dsc_min_bpp = fxp_q4_to_int_roundup(limits->link.min_bpp_x16);
> -
> dsc_joiner_max_bpp = get_max_compressed_bpp_with_joiner(display, adjusted_mode->clock,
> adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
> num_joined_pipes);
> - dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_joiner_max_bpp, fxp_q4_to_int(limits->link.max_bpp_x16));
> -
> - /* FIXME: remove the round trip via integers */
> - min_bpp_x16 = fxp_q4_from_int(dsc_min_bpp);
> - max_bpp_x16 = fxp_q4_from_int(dsc_max_bpp);
> + max_bpp_x16 = min(fxp_q4_from_int(dsc_joiner_max_bpp), limits->link.max_bpp_x16);
>
> bpp_step_x16 = intel_dp_dsc_bpp_step_x16(connector);
>
> @@ -2177,6 +2172,10 @@ static int dsc_compute_compressed_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> output_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
> max_bpp_x16 = min(max_bpp_x16, fxp_q4_from_int(output_bpp) - bpp_step_x16);
>
> + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !is_power_of_2(bpp_step_x16));
> + min_bpp_x16 = round_up(limits->link.min_bpp_x16, bpp_step_x16);
> + max_bpp_x16 = round_down(max_bpp_x16, bpp_step_x16);
> +
> for (bpp_x16 = max_bpp_x16; bpp_x16 >= min_bpp_x16; bpp_x16 -= bpp_step_x16) {
> if (!intel_dp_dsc_valid_compressed_bpp(intel_dp, bpp_x16))
> continue;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 13:31 [PATCH v2 00/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional link bpps Imre Deak
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use the correct connector while computing the link BPP limit on MST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 8:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 9:39 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Simplify handling the single-bpp case during state computation Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-06 12:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 9:53 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Validate compressed bpp vs. platform restrictions Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:54 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:03 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Update the total link slot count early Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:55 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:07 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Check BW limit on the local MST link early Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:06 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Simplify computing the min/max compressed bpp limits Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:11 ` Luca Coelho
2025-05-06 10:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Limit max link bpp properly to a fractional value on SST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:27 ` Luca Coelho
2025-05-06 12:34 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional compressed link bpps on MST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:02 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/display: Factor out intel_display_{min, max}_pipe_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 15:16 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 3:59 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-07 10:58 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 12:44 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dp: Export intel_dp_dsc_min_src_compressed_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915: Add support for forcing the link bpp on a connector Imre Deak
2025-05-07 5:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-07 12:03 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 12:41 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Enable fractional link bpps on MST if the bpp is forced Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:59 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional link bpps (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-28 13:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:11 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:12 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-28 17:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-06 8:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=707ea5e3-2376-4a85-97d4-cd16e436889d@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox