public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yadav, Arvind" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/7] drm/xe/vm: Add madvise autoreset interval notifier worker infrastructure
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:37:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70f3a306-15e4-4eb1-82da-74818f35b437@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ+HHMnSK49omV2Y@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 22856 bytes --]


On 26-02-2026 05:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 02:43:09PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> MADVISE_AUTORESET needs to reset VMA attributes when userspace unmaps
>> CPU-only ranges, but the MMU invalidate callback cannot take vm->lock
>> due to lock ordering (mmap_lock is already held).
>>
>> Add mmu_interval_notifier that queues work items for MMU_NOTIFY_UNMAP
>> events. The worker runs under vm->lock and resets attributes for VMAs
>> still marked XE_VMA_CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE (i.e., not yet GPU-touched).
>>
>> Work items are allocated from a mempool to handle atomic context in the
>> callback. The notifier is deactivated when GPU touches the VMA.
>>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost<matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray<himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav<arvind.yadav@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c | 394 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.h |   8 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h   |  41 +++
>>   3 files changed, 443 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>> index 52147f5eaaa0..4c0ffb100bcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.c
>> @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@
>>   #include "xe_vm_madvise.h"
>>   
>>   #include <linux/nospec.h>
>> +#include <linux/mempool.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>   #include <drm/xe_drm.h>
>>   
>>   #include "xe_bo.h"
>> +#include "xe_macros.h"
>>   #include "xe_pat.h"
>>   #include "xe_pt.h"
>>   #include "xe_svm.h"
>> @@ -500,3 +503,394 @@ int xe_vm_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *fil
>>   	xe_vm_put(vm);
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct xe_madvise_work_item - Work item for unmap processing
>> + * @work: work_struct
>> + * @vm: VM reference
>> + * @pool: Mempool for recycling
>> + * @start: Start address
>> + * @end: End address
>> + */
>> +struct xe_madvise_work_item {
>> +	struct work_struct work;
>> +	struct xe_vm *vm;
>> +	mempool_t *pool;
> Why mempool? Seems like we could just do kmalloc with correct gfp flags.


I tried kmalloc first, but ran into two issues:
GFP_KERNEL — fails because MMU notifier callbacks must not block, and 
GFP_KERNEL can sleep waiting for memory reclaim.
GFP_ATOMIC — triggers a circular lockdep warning: the MMU notifier holds 
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start, and GFP_ATOMIC internally tries to 
acquire fs_reclaim, which already depends on the MMU notifier lock.

Agreed. mempool looks unnecessary here. I re-tested this with 
kmalloc(..., GFP_NOWAIT) and that avoids both blocking and the 
reclaim-related lockdep issue I saw with the earlier approach. I will 
switch to that and drop the pool in the next version.


>
>> +	u64 start;
>> +	u64 end;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void xe_vma_set_default_attributes(struct xe_vma *vma)
>> +{
>> +	vma->attr.preferred_loc.devmem_fd = DRM_XE_PREFERRED_LOC_DEFAULT_DEVICE;
>> +	vma->attr.preferred_loc.migration_policy = DRM_XE_MIGRATE_ALL_PAGES;
>> +	vma->attr.pat_index = vma->attr.default_pat_index;
>> +	vma->attr.atomic_access = DRM_XE_ATOMIC_UNDEFINED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_vm_madvise_process_unmap - Process munmap for all VMAs in range
>> + * @vm: VM
>> + * @start: Start of unmap range
>> + * @end: End of unmap range
>> + *
>> + * Processes all VMAs overlapping the unmap range. An unmap can span multiple
>> + * VMAs, so we need to loop and process each segment.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error otherwise
>> + */
>> +static int xe_vm_madvise_process_unmap(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
>> +{
>> +	u64 addr = start;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
>> +
>> +	if (xe_vm_is_closed_or_banned(vm))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	while (addr < end) {
>> +		struct xe_vma *vma;
>> +		u64 seg_start, seg_end;
>> +		bool has_default_attr;
>> +
>> +		vma = xe_vm_find_overlapping_vma(vm, addr, end);
>> +		if (!vma)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		/* Skip GPU-touched VMAs - SVM handles them */
>> +		if (!xe_vma_has_cpu_autoreset_active(vma)) {
>> +			addr = xe_vma_end(vma);
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		has_default_attr = xe_vma_has_default_mem_attrs(vma);
>> +		seg_start = max(addr, xe_vma_start(vma));
>> +		seg_end = min(end, xe_vma_end(vma));
>> +
>> +		/* Expand for merging if VMA already has default attrs */
>> +		if (has_default_attr &&
>> +		    xe_vma_start(vma) >= start &&
>> +		    xe_vma_end(vma) <= end) {
>> +			seg_start = xe_vma_start(vma);
>> +			seg_end = xe_vma_end(vma);
>> +			xe_vm_find_cpu_addr_mirror_vma_range(vm, &seg_start, &seg_end);
>> +		} else if (xe_vma_start(vma) == seg_start && xe_vma_end(vma) == seg_end) {
>> +			xe_vma_set_default_attributes(vma);
>> +			addr = seg_end;
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (xe_vma_start(vma) == seg_start &&
>> +		    xe_vma_end(vma) == seg_end &&
>> +		    has_default_attr) {
>> +			addr = seg_end;
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		err = xe_vm_alloc_cpu_addr_mirror_vma(vm, seg_start, seg_end - seg_start);
>> +		if (err) {
>> +			if (err == -ENOENT) {
>> +				addr = seg_end;
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +			return err;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		addr = seg_end;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_madvise_work_func - Worker to process unmap
>> + * @w: work_struct
>> + *
>> + * Processes a single unmap by taking vm->lock and calling the helper.
>> + * Each unmap has its own work item, so no interval loss.
>> + */
>> +static void xe_madvise_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_madvise_work_item *item = container_of(w, struct xe_madvise_work_item, work);
>> +	struct xe_vm *vm = item->vm;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	down_write(&vm->lock);
>> +	err = xe_vm_madvise_process_unmap(vm, item->start, item->end);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm,
>> +			 "madvise autoreset failed [%#llx-%#llx]: %d\n",
>> +			 item->start, item->end, err);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Best-effort: Log failure and continue.
>> +	 * Core correctness from CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE flag.
>> +	 */
>> +	up_write(&vm->lock);
>> +	xe_vm_put(vm);
>> +	mempool_free(item, item->pool);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_madvise_notifier_callback - MMU notifier callback for CPU munmap
>> + * @mni: mmu_interval_notifier
>> + * @range: mmu_notifier_range
>> + * @cur_seq: current sequence number
>> + *
>> + * Queues work to reset VMA attributes. Cannot take vm->lock (circular locking),
>> + * so uses workqueue. GFP_ATOMIC allocation may fail; drops event if so.
>> + *
>> + * Return: true (never blocks)
>> + */
>> +static bool xe_madvise_notifier_callback(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
>> +					 const struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
>> +					 unsigned long cur_seq)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_madvise_notifier *notifier =
>> +		container_of(mni, struct xe_madvise_notifier, mmu_notifier);
>> +	struct xe_vm *vm = notifier->vm;
>> +	struct xe_madvise_work_item *item;
>> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>> +	mempool_t *pool;
>> +	u64 start, end;
>> +
>> +	if (range->event != MMU_NOTIFY_UNMAP)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Best-effort: skip in non-blockable contexts to avoid building up work.
>> +	 * Correctness does not rely on this notifier - CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE flag
>> +	 * prevents GPU PTE zaps on CPU-only VMAs in the zap path.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	/* Consume seq (interval-notifier convention) */
>> +	mmu_interval_set_seq(mni, cur_seq);
>> +
>> +	/* Best-effort: core correctness from CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE check in zap path */
>> +
>> +	start = max_t(u64, range->start, notifier->vma_start);
>> +	end = min_t(u64, range->end, notifier->vma_end);
>> +
>> +	if (start >= end)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	pool = READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.pool);
>> +	wq = READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq);
>> +	if (!pool || !wq || atomic_read(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing))
> Can you explain the use of READ_ONCE, xchg, and atomics? At first glance
> it seems unnecessary or overly complicated. Let’s start with the problem
> this is trying to solve and see if we can find a simpler approach.
>
> My initial thought is a VM-wide rwsem, marked as reclaim-safe. The
> notifiers would take it in read mode to check whether the VM is tearing
> down, and the fini path would take it in write mode to initiate
> teardown...


Agreed. This got more complicated than it needs to be. I reworked it to 
use a VM-wide rw_semaphore for teardown serialization, so the atomic_t, 
READ_ONCE(), and xchg() go away..

>
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	/* GFP_ATOMIC to avoid fs_reclaim lockdep in notifier context */
>> +	item = mempool_alloc(pool, GFP_ATOMIC);
> Again, probably just use kmalloc. Also s/GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT. We
> really shouldn’t be using GFP_ATOMIC in Xe per the DRM docs unless a
> failed memory allocation would take down the device. We likely abuse
> GFP_ATOMIC in several places that we should clean up, but in this case
> it’s pretty clear GFP_NOWAIT is what we want, as failure isn’t
> fatal—just sub-optimal.


Agreed. This should be |GFP_NOWAIT|, not |GFP_ATOMIC|. Allocation 
failure here is non-fatal, so |GFP_NOWAIT| is the right fit. I willl 
switch to |kmalloc(..., GFP_NOWAIT)| and drop the mempool.

>
>> +	if (!item)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	memset(item, 0, sizeof(*item));
>> +	INIT_WORK(&item->work, xe_madvise_work_func);
>> +	item->vm = xe_vm_get(vm);
>> +	item->pool = pool;
>> +	item->start = start;
>> +	item->end = end;
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing))) {
> Same as above the atomic usage...


Noted, Will remove.

>
>> +		xe_vm_put(item->vm);
>> +		mempool_free(item, pool);
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	queue_work(wq, &item->work);
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops xe_madvise_notifier_ops = {
>> +	.invalidate = xe_madvise_notifier_callback,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_vm_madvise_init - Initialize madvise notifier infrastructure
>> + * @vm: VM
>> + *
>> + * Sets up workqueue and mempool for async munmap processing.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, -ENOMEM on failure
>> + */
>> +int xe_vm_madvise_init(struct xe_vm *vm)
>> +{
>> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>> +	mempool_t *pool;
>> +
>> +	/* Always initialize list and mutex - fini may be called on partial init */
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list);
>> +	mutex_init(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +
>> +	wq = READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq);
>> +	pool = READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.pool);
>> +
>> +	/* Guard against double initialization and detect partial init */
>> +	if (wq || pool) {
>> +		XE_WARN_ON(!wq || !pool);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	WRITE_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq, NULL);
>> +	WRITE_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.pool, NULL);
>> +	atomic_set(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing, 1);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * WQ_UNBOUND: best-effort optimization, not critical path.
>> +	 * No WQ_MEM_RECLAIM: worker allocates memory (VMA ops with GFP_KERNEL).
>> +	 * Not on reclaim path - merely resets attributes after munmap.
>> +	 */
>> +	vm->svm.madvise_work.wq = alloc_workqueue("xe_madvise", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
>> +	if (!vm->svm.madvise_work.wq)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Mempool for GFP_ATOMIC allocs in notifier callback */
>> +	vm->svm.madvise_work.pool =
>> +		mempool_create_kmalloc_pool(64,
>> +					     sizeof(struct xe_madvise_work_item));
>> +	if (!vm->svm.madvise_work.pool) {
>> +		destroy_workqueue(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq);
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq, NULL);
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	atomic_set(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing, 0);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_vm_madvise_fini - Cleanup all madvise notifiers
>> + * @vm: VM
>> + *
>> + * Tears down notifiers and drains workqueue. Safe if init partially failed.
>> + * Order: closing flag → remove notifiers (SRCU sync) → drain wq → destroy.
>> + */
>> +void xe_vm_madvise_fini(struct xe_vm *vm)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_madvise_notifier *notifier, *next;
>> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>> +	mempool_t *pool;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
>> +
>> +	atomic_set(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing, 1);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Detach notifiers under lock, then remove outside lock (SRCU sync can be slow).
>> +	 * Splice avoids holding mutex across mmu_interval_notifier_remove() SRCU sync.
>> +	 * Removing notifiers first (before drain) prevents new invalidate callbacks.
>> +	 */
>> +	mutex_lock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +	list_splice_init(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list, &tmp);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +
>> +	/* Now remove notifiers without holding lock - mmu_interval_notifier_remove() SRCU-syncs */
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(notifier, next, &tmp, list) {
>> +		list_del(&notifier->list);
>> +		mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->mmu_notifier);
>> +		xe_vm_put(notifier->vm);
>> +		kfree(notifier);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Drain and destroy workqueue */
>> +	wq = xchg(&vm->svm.madvise_work.wq, NULL);
>> +	if (wq) {
>> +		drain_workqueue(wq);
> Work items in wq call xe_madvise_work_func, which takes vm->lock in
> write mode. If we try to drain here after the work item executing
> xe_madvise_work_func has started or is queued, I think we could
> deadlock. Lockdep should complain about this if you run a test that
> triggers xe_madvise_work_func at least once — or at least it should. If
> it doesn’t, then workqueues likely have an issue in their lockdep
> implementation as 'drain_workqueue' should touch its lockdep map which
> has tainted vm->lock (i.e., is outside of it).
>
> So perhaps call this function without vm->lock and take as need in the
> this function, then drop it drain the work queue, etc...


Good catch. Draining the workqueue while holding |vm->lock| can deadlock 
against a worker that takes |vm->lock|. I fixed that by dropping 
|vm->lock| before |xe_vm_madvise_fini()|. In the reworked teardown path, 
|drain_workqueue()| runs with neither |vm->lock| nor the teardown 
semaphore held.


>
>> +		destroy_workqueue(wq);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	pool = xchg(&vm->svm.madvise_work.pool, NULL);
>> +	if (pool)
>> +		mempool_destroy(pool);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_vm_madvise_register_notifier_range - Register MMU notifier for address range
>> + * @vm: VM
>> + * @start: Start address (page-aligned)
>> + * @end: End address (page-aligned)
>> + *
>> + * Registers interval notifier for munmap tracking. Uses addresses (not VMA pointers)
>> + * to avoid UAF after dropping vm->lock. Deduplicates by range.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
>> + */
>> +int xe_vm_madvise_register_notifier_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_madvise_notifier *notifier, *existing;
>> +	int err;
>> +
> I see this isn’t called under the vm->lock write lock. Is there a reason
> not to? I think taking it under the write lock would help with the
> teardown sequence, since you wouldn’t be able to get here if
> xe_vm_is_closed_or_banned were stable—and we wouldn’t enter this
> function if that helper returned true.


I can make the closed/banned check stable at the call site under 
|vm->lock|, but I don’t think I can hold it across 
|mmu_interval_notifier_insert()| itself since that may take |mmap_lock| 
internally. I’ll restructure this so the state check happens under 
|vm->lock|, while the actual insert remains outside that lock.

>
>> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE) || !IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(end <= start))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (atomic_read(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing))
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +	if (!READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.wq) ||
>> +	    !READ_ONCE(vm->svm.madvise_work.pool))
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Check mm early to avoid allocation if it's missing */
>> +	if (!vm->svm.gpusvm.mm)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* Dedupe: check if notifier exists for this range */
>> +	mutex_lock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
> If we had the vm->lock in write mode we could likely just drop
> svm.madvise_notifiers.lock for now, but once we move to fine grained
> locking in page faults [1] we'd in fact need a dedicated lock. So let's
> keep this.
>
> [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/707238/?series=162167&rev=2


Agreed. We should keep a dedicated lock here.

I donot think |vm->lock| can cover |mmu_interval_notifier_insert()| 
itself, since that path may take |mmap_lock| internally and would risk 
inverting the existing |mmap_lock -> vm->lock| ordering.

So I will keep |svm.madvise_notifiers.lock| in place. That also lines up 
better with the planned fine-grained page-fault locking work.

>
>> +	list_for_each_entry(existing, &vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list, list) {
>> +		if (existing->vma_start == start && existing->vma_end == end) {
> This is O(N) which typically isn't ideal. Better structure here? mtree?
> Does an mtree have its own locking so svm.madvise_notifiers.lock could
> just be dropped? I'd look into this.


Agreed. I switched this over to a maple tree, so the exact-range lookup 
is no longer O(N). That also lets me drop the list walk in the duplicate 
check.

>
>> +			mutex_unlock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +			return 0;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +
>> +	notifier = kzalloc(sizeof(*notifier), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!notifier)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	notifier->vm = xe_vm_get(vm);
>> +	notifier->vma_start = start;
>> +	notifier->vma_end = end;
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&notifier->list);
>> +
>> +	err = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier->mmu_notifier,
>> +					   vm->svm.gpusvm.mm,
>> +					   start,
>> +					   end - start,
>> +					   &xe_madvise_notifier_ops);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		xe_vm_put(notifier->vm);
>> +		kfree(notifier);
>> +		return err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Re-check closing to avoid teardown race */
>> +	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vm->svm.madvise_work.closing))) {
>> +		mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->mmu_notifier);
>> +		xe_vm_put(notifier->vm);
>> +		kfree(notifier);
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Add to list - check again for concurrent registration race */
>> +	mutex_lock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
> If we had the vm->lock in write mode, we couldn't get concurrent
> registrations.
>
> I likely have more comments, but I have enough concerns with the locking
> and structure in this patch that I’m going to pause reviewing the series
> until most of my comments are addressed. It’s hard to focus on anything
> else until we get these issues worked out.


I think the main issue is exactly the locking story around notifier 
insert/remove. We cannot hold |vm->lock| across 
|mmu_interval_notifier_insert()| because that may take |mmap_lock| 
internally and invert the existing ordering.

I have reworked this to simplify the teardown/registration side: drop 
the atomic/READ_ONCE/xchg handling, use a single teardown |rwsem|, and 
replace the list-based dedupe with a maple tree.
I will send a cleaned-up version with the locking documented more 
clearly. Sorry for the churn here.


Thanks,
Arvind

>
> Matt
>
>> +	list_for_each_entry(existing, &vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list, list) {
>> +		if (existing->vma_start == start && existing->vma_end == end) {
>> +			mutex_unlock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +			mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->mmu_notifier);
>> +			xe_vm_put(notifier->vm);
>> +			kfree(notifier);
>> +			return 0;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	list_add(&notifier->list, &vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.lock);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.h
>> index b0e1fc445f23..ba9cd7912113 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_madvise.h
>> @@ -6,10 +6,18 @@
>>   #ifndef _XE_VM_MADVISE_H_
>>   #define _XE_VM_MADVISE_H_
>>   
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>>   struct drm_device;
>>   struct drm_file;
>> +struct xe_vm;
>> +struct xe_vma;
>>   
>>   int xe_vm_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>   			struct drm_file *file);
>>   
>> +int xe_vm_madvise_init(struct xe_vm *vm);
>> +void xe_vm_madvise_fini(struct xe_vm *vm);
>> +int xe_vm_madvise_register_notifier_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end);
>> +
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
>> index 29ff63503d4c..eb978995000c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>   
>>   #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>>   #include <linux/kref.h>
>> +#include <linux/mempool.h>
>>   #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
>>   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>>   
>> @@ -29,6 +30,26 @@ struct xe_user_fence;
>>   struct xe_vm;
>>   struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op;
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * struct xe_madvise_notifier - CPU madvise notifier for memory attribute reset
>> + *
>> + * Tracks CPU munmap operations on SVM CPU address mirror VMAs.
>> + * When userspace unmaps CPU memory, this notifier processes attribute reset
>> + * via work queue to avoid circular locking (can't take vm->lock in callback).
>> + */
>> +struct xe_madvise_notifier {
>> +	/** @mmu_notifier: MMU interval notifier */
>> +	struct mmu_interval_notifier mmu_notifier;
>> +	/** @vm: VM this notifier belongs to (holds reference via xe_vm_get) */
>> +	struct xe_vm *vm;
>> +	/** @vma_start: Start address of VMA being tracked */
>> +	u64 vma_start;
>> +	/** @vma_end: End address of VMA being tracked */
>> +	u64 vma_end;
>> +	/** @list: Link in vm->svm.madvise_notifiers.list */
>> +	struct list_head list;
>> +};
>> +
>>   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG)
>>   #define TEST_VM_OPS_ERROR
>>   #define FORCE_OP_ERROR	BIT(31)
>> @@ -212,6 +233,26 @@ struct xe_vm {
>>   		struct xe_pagemap *pagemaps[XE_MAX_TILES_PER_DEVICE];
>>   		/** @svm.peer: Used for pagemap connectivity computations. */
>>   		struct drm_pagemap_peer peer;
>> +
>> +		/**
>> +		 * @svm.madvise_notifiers: Active CPU madvise notifiers
>> +		 */
>> +		struct {
>> +			/** @svm.madvise_notifiers.list: List of active notifiers */
>> +			struct list_head list;
>> +			/** @svm.madvise_notifiers.lock: Protects notifiers list */
>> +			struct mutex lock;
>> +		} madvise_notifiers;
>> +
>> +		/** @svm.madvise_work: Workqueue for async munmap processing */
>> +		struct {
>> +			/** @svm.madvise_work.wq: Workqueue */
>> +			struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>> +			/** @svm.madvise_work.pool: Mempool for work items */
>> +			mempool_t *pool;
>> +			/** @svm.madvise_work.closing: Teardown flag */
>> +			atomic_t closing;
>> +		} madvise_work;
>>   	} svm;
>>   
>>   	struct xe_device *xe;
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 27452 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-19  9:13 [RFC 0/7] drm/xe/svm: Add MMU notifier-based madvise autoreset on munmap Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 1/7] drm/xe/vm: Add CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE VMA flag Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 2/7] drm/xe/vm: Preserve CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE across GPUVA operations Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 3/7] drm/xe/svm: Clear CPU_AUTORESET_ACTIVE on first GPU fault Arvind Yadav
2026-02-20 20:12   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-20 22:33     ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-05  3:38       ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 4/7] drm/xe/vm: Add madvise autoreset interval notifier worker infrastructure Arvind Yadav
2026-02-25 23:34   ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-09  7:07     ` Yadav, Arvind [this message]
2026-03-09  9:32       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-11  6:34         ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 5/7] drm/xe/vm: Deactivate madvise notifier on GPU touch Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 6/7] drm/xe/vm: Wire MADVISE_AUTORESET notifiers into VM lifecycle Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:13 ` [RFC 7/7] drm/xe/svm: Correct memory attribute reset for partial unmap Arvind Yadav
2026-02-19  9:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/svm: Add MMU notifier-based madvise autoreset on munmap Patchwork
2026-02-19  9:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-19 10:40 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-19 13:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70f3a306-15e4-4eb1-82da-74818f35b437@intel.com \
    --to=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox