From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: disable fbc due to Wa_16023588340
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:17:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70fd9b0e-36a7-4247-914f-ac71c33fca7d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Znw5jj7YROnoWD9j@intel.com>
On 26/06/2024 16:53, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> On BMG-G21 we need to disable fbc due to complications around the WA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h | 8 ++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 4 +++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_wa.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_wa.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>> index 63201d09852c..be644ab6ae00 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>> @@ -6,8 +6,16 @@
>> #ifndef __INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_H__
>> #define __INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_H__
>>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> struct drm_i915_private;
>>
>> void intel_display_wa_apply(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>>
>> +#ifdef I915
>> +static inline bool intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { return false; }
>> +#else
>> +bool intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +#endif
>
> please avoid the ifdef I915 in new patches as we are trying to get away from that
> in favor of a clean separation.
Can you please share an example for the best way to do that here, with
clean separation?
I can add a new .c just for intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340 and move
it there, which then avoids the ifdef I think, but that then adds an
entirely new file just for this tiny stub. Unless I can dump it
somewhere else?
>
>> +
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> index 67116c9f1464..8488f82143a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>> #include "intel_display_device.h"
>> #include "intel_display_trace.h"
>> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>> +#include "intel_display_wa.h"
>> #include "intel_fbc.h"
>> #include "intel_fbc_regs.h"
>> #include "intel_frontbuffer.h"
>> @@ -1237,6 +1238,11 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> + if (intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(i915)) {
>> + plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "Wa_16023588340";
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* WaFbcTurnOffFbcWhenHyperVisorIsUsed:skl,bxt */
>> if (i915_vtd_active(i915) && (IS_SKYLAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))) {
>> plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "VT-d enabled";
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> index 0e16e5029081..f7521fd5db4c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ uses_generated_oob := \
>> $(obj)/xe_ring_ops.o \
>> $(obj)/xe_vm.o \
>> $(obj)/xe_wa.o \
>> - $(obj)/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.o
>> + $(obj)/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.o \
>> + $(obj)/display/xe_display_wa.o \
>>
>> $(uses_generated_oob): $(generated_oob)
>>
>> @@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
>> display/xe_display.o \
>> display/xe_display_misc.o \
>> display/xe_display_rps.o \
>> + display/xe_display_wa.o \
>> display/xe_dsb_buffer.o \
>> display/xe_fb_pin.o \
>> display/xe_hdcp_gsc.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_wa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_wa.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..68e3d1959ad6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_wa.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "intel_display_wa.h"
>> +
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +#include "xe_wa.h"
>> +
>> +#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
>> +
>> +bool intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> + return XE_WA(xe_root_mmio_gt(i915), 16023588340);
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.45.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 14:31 [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/bmg: implement Wa_16023588340 Matthew Auld
2024-06-19 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: disable fbc due to Wa_16023588340 Matthew Auld
2024-06-20 22:20 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-06-25 8:09 ` Matthew Auld
2024-06-26 15:14 ` Matthew Auld
2024-06-26 15:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-26 16:18 ` Matthew Auld
2024-06-26 15:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-26 16:17 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-06-26 17:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-26 17:42 ` Matt Roper
2024-06-28 5:30 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-06-28 18:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-28 20:23 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-02 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2024-07-02 10:18 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-19 14:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/bmg: implement Wa_16023588340 Patchwork
2024-06-19 14:37 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-06-19 14:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-06-19 14:50 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-19 14:52 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-19 14:53 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-06-19 15:18 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-06-19 20:20 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Cavitt, Jonathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70fd9b0e-36a7-4247-914f-ac71c33fca7d@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox