Some revisions of MTL do not properly report the correct value from the
FUSE3_MBC_MEDIA register.  This results in the wrong value being
reported for the l3 mask.

Use the recommended replacement register in this case.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan-Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
---

v2: Update includes ordering (Jani)

 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c       | 8 ++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c  | 9 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules   | 1 +
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
index 0d1a4a9f4e119..e0d735a5a7fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
@@ -522,6 +522,9 @@
 #define   FORCEWAKE_MT(bit)			BIT(bit)
 #define   FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(bit)		BIT((bit) + 16)
 
+#define MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR			XE_REG(0x138010)
+#define   MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK			REG_GENMASK(5, 3)
+
 #define MTL_MEDIA_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS		XE_REG(0x138030)
 #define MTL_MEDIA_MC6				XE_REG(0x138048)
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
index 7d7bd0be6233e..3253eaefb18b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 
 #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
 
+#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
+
 #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
 #include "xe_assert.h"
 #include "xe_gt.h"
@@ -14,6 +16,7 @@
 #include "xe_guc_hwconfig.h"
 #include "xe_mmio.h"
 #include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_wa.h"
 
 /**
  * DOC: GT Multicast/Replicated (MCR) Register Support
@@ -245,6 +248,11 @@ static void init_steering_l3bank(struct xe_gt *gt)
 		u32 bank_mask = REG_FIELD_GET(GT_L3_EXC_MASK,
 					      xe_mmio_read32(gt, XEHP_FUSE4));
 
+		/* Wa_14016747170 */
+		if (XE_WA(gt, 14016747170))
+			bank_mask = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK,
+						  xe_mmio_read32(gt, MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR));
+

Was there any particular reason for just adding an if(wa) and not using an if(wa)/else condition similar to i915 implementation?

CC: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>

 		/*
 		 * Group selects mslice, instance selects bank within mslice.
 		 * Bank 0 is always valid _except_ when the bank mask is 010b.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
index 0662f71c6ede7..f1946ce0d937b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
@@ -8,10 +8,13 @@
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 
+#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
+
 #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
 #include "xe_assert.h"
 #include "xe_gt.h"
 #include "xe_mmio.h"
+#include "xe_wa.h"
 
 static void
 load_dss_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_dss_mask_t mask, int numregs, ...)
@@ -144,6 +147,12 @@ load_l3_bank_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_l3_bank_mask_t l3_bank_mask)
 		u32 fuse4 = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XEHP_FUSE4);
 		u32 bank_val = REG_FIELD_GET(GT_L3_EXC_MASK, fuse4);
 
+		/* Wa_14016747170 */
+		if (XE_WA(gt, 14016747170)) {
+			fuse4 = xe_mmio_read32(gt, MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR);
+			bank_val = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK, fuse4);
+		}
+
 		bitmap_set_value8(per_mask_bit, 0x3, 0);
 		gen_l3_mask_from_pattern(xe, per_node, per_mask_bit, 2, bank_val);
 		gen_l3_mask_from_pattern(xe, l3_bank_mask, per_node, 4,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
index 920ca50601466..5bac4123b5db1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@
 16023588340	GRAPHICS_VERSION(2001)
 14019789679	GRAPHICS_VERSION(1255)
 		GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 2004)
+14016747170	GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 1271), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)