From: "Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture (rev21)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:52:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71cc5553-9232-4c4e-970a-8e0dd17fc828@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172625393816.997912.4939749842744161403@2413ebb6fbb6>
The reason caused test failed is not related to this series.
It is a pre-existing condition of missing NULL pointer check.
I will post another patch for the fix.
Regards,
Zhanjun Dong
On 2024-09-13 2:58 p.m., Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture
> (rev21)
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/128077/
> <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/128077/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:*
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-128077v21/index.html
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-128077v21/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from
> xe-1948-df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328_BAT ->
> xe-pw-128077v21_BAT
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-128077v21_BAT absolutely need
> to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-128077v21_BAT, please notify your bug team
> (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
> Participating hosts (9 -> 9)
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> xe-pw-128077v21_BAT:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@xe_live_ktest@xe_bo@xe_bo_shrink_kunit:
> o bat-lnl-2: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1948-df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328/bat-lnl-2/igt@xe_live_ktest@xe_bo@xe_bo_shrink_kunit.html> -> ABORT <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-128077v21/bat-lnl-2/igt@xe_live_ktest@xe_bo@xe_bo_shrink_kunit.html> +1 other test abort
>
>
> Known issues
>
> Here are the changes found in xe-pw-128077v21_BAT that come from known
> issues:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible fixes
>
> * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> o bat-lnl-1: FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1948-df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328/bat-lnl-1/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html> (Intel XE#886 <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/886>) -> PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-128077v21/bat-lnl-1/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html> +1 other test pass
>
>
> Build changes
>
> * IGT: IGT_8016 -> IGT_8017
> * Linux: xe-1948-df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328 ->
> xe-pw-128077v21
>
> IGT_8016: 786f0469afc0665a02dd82bf17544868188fbdeb @
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
> IGT_8017: 8017
> xe-1948-df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328:
> df3eecb1fa97d6d35569c2fa39f0da78b9f13328
> xe-pw-128077v21: 128077v21
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 23:09 [PATCH v20 0/6] drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 1/6] drm/xe/guc: Prepare GuC register list and update ADS size " Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 2/6] drm/xe/guc: Add XE_LP steered register lists Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 3/6] drm/xe/guc: Add capture size check in GuC log buffer Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 4/6] drm/xe/guc: Extract GuC error capture lists Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 5/6] drm/xe/guc: Plumb GuC-capture into dev coredump Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:09 ` [PATCH v20 6/6] drm/xe/guc: Save manual engine capture into capture list Zhanjun Dong
2024-09-12 23:14 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture (rev20) Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:28 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:31 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 23:50 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-13 17:04 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Add GuC based register capture for error capture (rev21) Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:33 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:36 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:37 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 18:58 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-17 15:52 ` Dong, Zhanjun [this message]
2024-09-18 23:51 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-09-14 13:57 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:47 ` Dong, Zhanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71cc5553-9232-4c4e-970a-8e0dd17fc828@intel.com \
--to=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox