From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe/lnl: Offload system clear page activity to GPU
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:36:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77b3e3994036e4fb6874aff6a1ce39543e7eefea.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b393e5ab-d69c-4bde-9ba2-3801ad8d5b48@linux.intel.com>
Hi, Nirmoy,
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 18:01 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>
> On 8/19/2024 1:05 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > On 16/08/2024 14:51, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > > On LNL because of flat CCS, driver creates migrates job to clear
> > > CCS meta data. Extend that to also clear system pages using GPU.
> > > Inform TTM to allocate pages without __GFP_ZERO to avoid double
> > > page
> > > clearing by clearing out TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC flag and set
> > > TTM_TT_FLAG_CLEARED_ON_FREE while freeing to skip ttm pool's
> > > clear
> > > on free as XE now takes care of clearing pages. If a bo is in
> > > system
> > > placement such as BO created with
> > > DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_DEFER_BACKING
> > > and there is a cpu map then for such BO gpu clear will be avoided
> > > as
> > > there is no dma mapping for such BO at that moment to create
> > > migration
> > > jobs.
> > >
> > > Tested this patch api_overhead_benchmark_l0 from
> > > https://github.com/intel/compute-benchmarks
> > >
> > > Without the patch:
> > > api_overhead_benchmark_l0 --testFilter=UsmMemoryAllocation:
> > > UsmMemoryAllocation(api=l0 type=Host size=4KB) 84.206 us
> > > UsmMemoryAllocation(api=l0 type=Host size=1GB) 105775.56 us
> > > erf tool top 5 entries:
> > > 71.44% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k] clear_page_erms
> > > 6.34% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > __pageblock_pfn_to_page
> > > 2.24% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpa_flush
> > > 2.15% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > pages_are_mergeable
> > > 1.94% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > find_next_iomem_res
> > >
> > > With the patch:
> > > api_overhead_benchmark_l0 --testFilter=UsmMemoryAllocation:
> > > UsmMemoryAllocation(api=l0 type=Host size=4KB) 79.439 us
> > > UsmMemoryAllocation(api=l0 type=Host size=1GB) 98677.75 us
> > > Perf tool top 5 entries:
> > > 11.16% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > __pageblock_pfn_to_page
> > > 7.85% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpa_flush
> > > 7.59% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > find_next_iomem_res
> > > 7.24% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > pages_are_mergeable
> > > 5.53% api_overhead_be [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> > > lookup_address_in_pgd_attr
> > >
> > > Without this patch clear_page_erms() dominates execution time
> > > which is
> > > also not pipelined with migration jobs. With this patch page
> > > clearing
> > > will get pipelined with migration job and will free CPU for more
> > > work.
> > >
> > > v2: Handle regression on dgfx(Himal)
> > > Update commit message as no ttm API changes needed.
> > > v3: Fix Kunit test.
> > > v4: handle data leak on cpu mmap(Thomas)
> > > v5: s/gpu_page_clear/gpu_page_clear_sys and move setting
> > > it to xe_ttm_sys_mgr_init() and other nits (Matt Auld)
> > > v6: Disable it when init_on_alloc and/or init_on_free is
> > > active(Matt)
> > > Use compute-benchmarks as reporter used it to report this
> > > allocation latency issue also a proper test application than
> > > mime.
> > > In v5, the test showed significant reduction in alloc
> > > latency but
> > > that is not the case any more, I think this was mostly
> > > because
> > > previous test was done on IFWI which had low mem BW from
> > > CPU.
> > >
> > > Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
>
> Thanks Matt.
>
> Pushed this to drm-xe-next. The series contains a ttm pool change
> which
> as agreed with Christian
>
> is small enough to not cause any issue so can be pulled though drm-
> xe-next.
I have a question that was sent as a reply-to on that patch.
Thanks,
Thomas
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 13:51 [PATCH v6 1/2] drm/ttm: Add a flag to allow drivers to skip clear-on-free Nirmoy Das
2024-08-16 13:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe/lnl: Offload system clear page activity to GPU Nirmoy Das
2024-08-19 11:05 ` Matthew Auld
2024-08-19 16:01 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-20 13:36 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2024-08-16 14:25 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v6,1/2] drm/ttm: Add a flag to allow drivers to skip clear-on-free Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:25 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:38 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:40 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:42 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-16 14:57 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-17 0:39 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-08-20 13:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Thomas Hellström
2024-08-20 14:06 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-20 15:30 ` Christian König
2024-08-20 15:45 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-08-20 15:47 ` Christian König
2024-08-20 16:46 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-21 7:47 ` Christian König
2024-08-21 8:08 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-08-21 10:22 ` Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77b3e3994036e4fb6874aff6a1ce39543e7eefea.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox