From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Varun Gupta <varun.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
<szymon.markiewicz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Guard page-fault ack with runtime PM check
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:23:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78286916-40ee-4ec1-83b2-4d36678498ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apqBlUxnqRBJ9uBc@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com>
On 04-09-2026 14:00, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 01:35:06PM +0530, Varun Gupta wrote:
>> During VM teardown, the VM's runtime PM reference is dropped
>> asynchronously, allowing the device to autosuspend while stale page
>> faults belonging to the now-dead VM are still queued. When the
>> page-fault worker later tries to ack one of these, it calls into
>> guc_ct_send_locked() on an already-suspended device, tripping:
>>
>> Assertion `!xe_pm_runtime_suspended(xe)` failed!
>> WARNING at xe_device.c:1267 xe_device_assert_mem_access+0x11c/0x140 [xe]
>>
>> A live VM/exec queue always holds a PM reference while it has
>> outstanding work, so if the device is suspended at ack time, the
>> owning context is already gone and the fault is stale.
>>
>> Take a runtime PM reference across the entire page-fault ack batch
>> preventing mid-batch suspends.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Hold PM ref across the entire batch (begin/end) instead of per-ack.
>> This prevents the device from autosuspending mid-batch, which would
>> leave write_only acks written but the end flush skipped, and skip
>> counter++, desyncing the cadence check.(Himal)
>> - Add a comment explaining stale faults.(Himal)
>>
>
> I'd guard the entire page fault fault handler with PM a ref rather than
> the ack part.
>
> e.g. At the very top of xe_pagefault_queue_work:
>
> guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
+1
>
> Matt
>
>> Fixes: f289f7807119 ("drm/xe: Add xe_guc_pagefault layer")
>> Reported-by: Szymon Markiewicz <szymon.markiewicz@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Varun Gupta <varun.gupta@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pagefault.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pagefault.c
>> index 8f8210a732e9..9c9cd6e056fb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pagefault.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pagefault.c
>> @@ -9,12 +9,21 @@
>> #include "xe_guc_pagefault.h"
>> #include "xe_pagefault.h"
>> #include "xe_pagefault_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_pm.h"
>>
>> #define XE_GUC_PAGEFAULT_FLUSH_PERIOD BIT(4) /* Sixteen */
>>
>> static void guc_ack_fault_begin(void *private)
>> {
>> struct xe_guc *guc = private;
>> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Live VMs hold a PM ref, so faults during suspend are stale.
>> + * Hold a PM ref across the entire batch to safely drain them
>> + * and prevent mid-batch autosuspend from desyncing CT flushes.
>> + */
>> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
>>
>> xe_guc_ct_lock(&guc->ct);
>>
>> @@ -62,10 +71,13 @@ static void guc_ack_fault(struct xe_pagefault *pf, int err)
>> static void guc_ack_fault_end(void *private)
>> {
>> struct xe_guc *guc = private;
>> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>>
>> if ((guc->pagefault_ack_counter & (XE_GUC_PAGEFAULT_FLUSH_PERIOD - 1)) != 1)
>> xe_guc_ct_send_flush(&guc->ct);
>> xe_guc_ct_unlock(&guc->ct);
>> +
>> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct xe_pagefault_ops guc_pagefault_ops = {
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 8:05 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Guard page-fault ack with runtime PM check Varun Gupta
2026-09-04 8:25 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/guc: Guard page-fault ack with runtime PM check (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-04 8:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-04 8:30 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Guard page-fault ack with runtime PM check Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 8:53 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2026-09-04 9:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/xe/guc: Guard page-fault ack with runtime PM check (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-04 19:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78286916-40ee-4ec1-83b2-4d36678498ec@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=szymon.markiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=varun.gupta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox